|
Event: DC Pathfinder Society Game Day
Event #: 3203
Date: 09/11/10
Scenario: Pathfinder Society Scenario #49: Among the Dead (PFRPG) PDF
GM #:2405
GM Name: Scott C. Nolan
Character #: 3622-4
Character Name: Iago Isildur
Event: DC Pathfinder Society Game Day
Event #: 3203
Date: 09/11/10
Scenario: Pathfinder Society Scenario #37: The Beggar's Pearl (PFRPG) PDF
GM #:5635
GM Name: Erich Leeser
Character #: 3622-4
Character Name: Iago Isildur
Please explain your problem below:
(notice on replaying a scenario)
Hello,
I know that this is almost a year later, but I remember that Scott Nolan told me, that this was a Legal Replay. I remember he told me that since I had a different character of a different faction, and since I was the 4th person there to make the table legal, that I could legally replay the scenario. I remember he said the same applied for the second session with #37 the Beggars Pearl as well. I was given a chronicle sheet for both scenarios.
On the plus side your system spotted an error i had made. I hade acidently given my character Iago Isildur #3622-4 my GM credit on May 7 2011 for when I ran Black waters in New Hampshire, when i had arleady awarded the GM credit to my other character Aravice #3622-7, when I Gmed black waters in New york on Dec 29 2010. I have gone in and edited my character out of that session and crossed off the chronicle sheet.
Thank you,
Myles Crocker
|
Hmm...well, depending on when the rule change went through, you may have been the victim of some rules confusion here. I'm not sure exactly when we implemented it, but the current rule for scenario credit is that you can receive credit for a scenario exactly twice. Once as a player, once as a GM, and that's it. Anything recorded prior to the change, of course, is still perfectly viable and was grandfathered in, but anything after that...well, if your scenario took place after the change occurred, I'm afraid it's not a legal chronicle, as sorry as I am to say it.
Of course, if anyone remembers when we made the change, that would make this a whole lot easier to figure out :)
-Dane Pitchford, Seattle Venture Captain
|
|
Dane,
Quite true, I suppose the question of whether this was a legal replay would depend on the date of the new ruling. I remember in conversation Mr. Nolan mentioned that he was a lawyer, so I assumed he would be up on the rules.
Here is the closest thing to a date I can find
Hyrum's post
The post is dated November 22 2010. This falls after September 11 2010.
I hope this helps,
Myles Crocker