Stynkk |
Actually... a sorcerer could write spells into a spellbook using the processes described in the Magic Chapter: Arcane Magical Writings.
However, they could not use the formulae there to create scrolls. You have to actually cast the spell to make a new scroll.
So, what you'd have is a book with spell information (full of spells you likely would not "know") which you could not use in any way.
You could create scrolls of the spells your sorcerer knows, however.
LazarX |
...create a spell book? Exclusively for the purpose of creating scrolls, I mean.
No... but there would be no reason or gain in doing so. A sorcerer can only create scrolls of the spells they know. And it's not a requirement that can be bypassed. It's not a popular feat for them to take.
Bascaria |
Actually... a sorcerer could write spells into a spellbook using the processes described in the Magic Chapter: Arcane Magical Writings.
However, they could not use the formulae there to create scrolls. You have to actually cast the spell to make a new scroll.
So, what you'd have is a book with spell information (full of spells you likely would not "know") which you could not use in any way.
You could create scrolls of the spells your sorcerer knows, however.
Only classes with access to spellbooks (wizards, magi) can write spells in a spellbook. Even a sorcerer with scribe scroll cannot. The process is significantly different (thus different costs, material requirements, and results). In one, you are essentially casting the spell onto a piece of paper, to be finished later. In another you are writing down the entire process of casting the spell as a sort of "how-to" guide for yourself. Sorcerers cannot do this, even if they have the scribe scroll feat.
pluvia33 |
Mynameisjake wrote:...create a spell book? Exclusively for the purpose of creating scrolls, I mean.He could make a bunch of scrolls and bind them together into a book. He could not make a spellbook, however.
This is actually an awesome idea and I think I might steal it. Not just for Sorcerers, but anyone who takes the Scribe Scroll feat. Even an Oracle can have a "Spellbook" this way. They just add spells to the sheets of paper as scrolls. When they use the page, the magic writing disappears and can be replaced later with a new spell. I think it's pretty cool.
Kelso |
This is actually an awesome idea and I think I might steal it. Not just for Sorcerers, but anyone who takes the Scribe Scroll feat. Even an Oracle can have a "Spellbook" this way. They just add spells to the sheets of paper as scrolls. When they use the page, the magic writing disappears and can be replaced later with a new spell. I think it's pretty cool.
Agreed. It is a cool roleplaying idea. I would not let one of my players have any kind of discount on the craft cost for doing it, but I don't think it breaks anything to let a player bind their scrolls together into a book.
Furthermore, I think it would be a pretty awesome way to hand out treasure scrolls. A book full of all the 0 and 1st level scrolls for a given class wouldn't be a bank breaker, but still useful in many situations.
pluvia33 |
pluvia33 wrote:When they use the page, the magic writing disappears and can be replaced later with a new spell. I think it's pretty cool.The page of the spellbook itself would disappear, not just the writing.
Nope:
The writing vanishes from the scroll when the spell is activated.
It says nothing about the scroll. If the paper itself disappeared, a scroll with multiple spells wouldn't work very well.
Kelso |
pluvia33 wrote:When they use the page, the magic writing disappears and can be replaced later with a new spell. I think it's pretty cool.The page of the spellbook itself would disappear, not just the writing.
Core Rulebook, top of p. 491
"The writing for an activated spell disappears from the scroll as the spell is cast."