Ambrosia Slaad |
just saying, too much hate on 'em classes, people should learn to relax some and not worry too much on who can out do who an' whatnot
"I like barbarians, monks, and rogues
From Tim Hitchcock to Nick LoguePoint bought & optimized, 'til it's sick
There's more to the game than just DPR Olympics
You have fun..." (probably NSFW)
wraithstrike |
just saying, too much hate on 'em classes, people should learn to relax some and not worry too much on who can out do who an' whatnot
It is not hate against them. Many people want to play these classes, and they like them thematically. They are just disappointed by how they work mechanically.
Well some people might want too much out of them, but some just want them to be a little bit better.
Freehold DM |
ulgulanoth wrote:just saying, too much hate on 'em classes, people should learn to relax some and not worry too much on who can out do who an' whatnotIt is not hate against them. Many people want to play these classes, and they like them thematically. They are just disappointed by how they work mechanically.
Well some people might want too much out of them, but some just want them to be a little bit better.
The only one I haven't played lately was a rogue, and I have had fun each and every time regardless. DPR is a fool's game for the most part.
CourtFool |
It is not hate against them. Many people want to play these classes, and they like them thematically. They are just disappointed by how they work mechanically.
Well some people might want too much out of them, but some just want them to be a little bit better.
…or do what I think they should do better.
Freehold DM |
wraithstrike wrote:…or do what I think they should do better.It is not hate against them. Many people want to play these classes, and they like them thematically. They are just disappointed by how they work mechanically.
Well some people might want too much out of them, but some just want them to be a little bit better.
and what is that? Or did you already make a thread on that? If so, where is it?
Lobolusk |
I think it really depends on your style of play, and what you want out of a character. and your personality type. i play a luchador grappling fiend monk game wise he sucks but. but he is not there to do max damage he is there for me to have a good time on sunday night and speak in my best Antonio banderas accent
Lobolusk |
I think it really depends on your style of play, and what you want out of a character. and your personality type. i play a luchador grappling fiend monk game wise he sucks but. but he is not there to do max damage he is there for me to have a good time on sunday night and speak in my best Antonio banderas accent
in fact imagine all my posts are read by him. it makes it ten times better
Ironicdisaster |
Lobolusk wrote:I think it really depends on your style of play, and what you want out of a character. and your personality type. i play a luchador grappling fiend monk game wise he sucks but. but he is not there to do max damage he is there for me to have a good time on sunday night and speak in my best Antonio banderas accentin fact imagine all my posts are read by him. it makes it ten times better
+1 to you, as well!
wraithstrike |
Why fun is the primary reason we do what we do, some people get mighty unhappy if they don't feel effective. Everyone wants something different from the game. Some can play a character that can fight his way out of a paper bag and still have a good time, others not so much.
@ the OP:It is not about outdoing anyone for the most part. It is about meeting the bar. Where that bar is happens to be something each person has to decide for themselves. The common issue is that for many of us the monk/rogue/barbarian does not reach the bar no matter what our standards are.
Personally I like the rogue, and I need to take a second look at the barbarian after the APG.