I think I'm just going to ban inherent bonuses from my games. They're boring and hardly ever come up anyway.It's also useful in lowering maximum Spell DC which is a significant issue in the end game when inherents become more commonplace.
Actually Save DC's don't keep up with save throw bonuses -- I've gone over this before in other threads.
|
I think I'm just going to ban inherent bonuses from my games. They're boring and hardly ever come up anyway.Don't forget abyssal sorcerers.
Eh, never seen a sorcerer played anyway. And there are way too many bonus types anyway.
Actually Save DC's don't keep up with save throw bonuses -- I've gone over this before in other threads.
Link? I'd actually like to see saving throws outpace DCs, so that PCs make them more often than not.
I'd like to see the link as well so I can follow the math.
Note: I'm not talking about the will save on a cleric potentially outpacing Save DCs but rather that lowering maximum Save DC increases the save percentage of poor to mid-level saves.
The original rules question (about stacking inherent bonuses) has long been answered, and this is becoming a discussion of GMing style, WBL philosophy, and other unrelated rules questions, which really should be in different threads and/or different forums. Thread locked.