
![]() |

Austin Morgan wrote:They're based off the expected Wealth By Level of that sub-tier.So in relation to the individual encounters it is a bit arbitrary!?
In so far as table 12-5 is used, what advancement track is used for PFS? Slow, medium or fast?
Quick and dirty math I came out with fast for a tier 1-2 that I looked at.

Joshua J. Frost |

The same as in PRPG for wealthy by level.
These assumptions can be offset by character death, incomplete scenarios, missing encounters, skipping encounters, tiering down, and so on but are generally spot on. When you figure in the day job roll and the expenditure of PA, it's more than balanced to the wealth-by-level table.

The Grandfather |

The same as in PRPG for wealthy by level.
These assumptions can be offset by character death, incomplete scenarios, missing encounters, skipping encounters, tiering down, and so on but are generally spot on. When you figure in the day job roll and the expenditure of PA, it's more than balanced to the wealth-by-level table.
Are we talking about table 12-5 of the PRPG now? As I understand it it has a fast, medium and slow track, just as the level advancement table has. If it is 12-5 that is used for PFS scenarios then whicj progression speed is used?
Or do you, Joshua, set rewards for submitted scenarios?
yoda8myhead |

There is a spreadsheet used to calculate wealth earned per encounter and then total all of that up for the entire adventure. It also provides a range of the target wealth a scenario should provide for each given tier. My best suggestion would be to look at existing Season 1 scenarios and try to hit close to the wealth earned in those. You'll notice they usually provide a very similar amount per adventure.