Slight Modification to Sneak Attack (and other precision damage attacks)


Homebrew and House Rules

51 to 56 of 56 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

Smurf status quo has been obtained.


Freddy Honeycutt wrote:
Has there ever been a thread dedicated to the hardy and noble smurf?

Have you looked in the OT forum?

Twins, Basil!

RPG Superstar 2008 Top 32

While I'm not opposed to the occasional tiny blue thread, it seems like this one actually had a meaningful conversation going on before the little ones started showing up. With that in mind, maybe the topic can return to the original thread topic, eh?

Grand Lodge

Hey, I just went with the flow. Anyone want to dispute my stance that concealment should not negate sneak attack on a hit?


Dispute your stance? Nope... "partail concealment (i.e. 20% miss-change) should not stop sneak attacks. Total concealment... yeah, they should.

EDIT: Oh yeah.. how smurf-tastic.


Ross Byers wrote:
While I'm not opposed to the occasional tiny blue thread, it seems like this one actually had a meaningful conversation going on before the little ones started showing up. With that in mind, maybe the topic can return to the original thread topic, eh?

I don't care if it went off topic. I gave up on the thread when the first 5 people to respond got upset about me 'adding limitations to a rogue' when the whole post was about modifying the ability so it could be used in all situations, but with a failure rate for concealment.

I'm not sure how modifying it so the rogue can use it for sneak attacking into concealment is nerfing the rogue, but hey, I know when to take my chips and go home.

51 to 56 of 56 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Homebrew and House Rules / Slight Modification to Sneak Attack (and other precision damage attacks) All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Homebrew and House Rules