Slight Modification to Sneak Attack (and other precision damage attacks)

[Uchawi]

Smurf status quo has been obtained.

[the Smurfoz]

Freddy Honeycutt wrote:

Has there ever been a thread dedicated to the hardy and noble smurf?

Have you looked in the OT forum?

Twins, Basil!

[Ross Byers]

While I'm not opposed to the occasional tiny blue thread, it seems like this one actually had a meaningful conversation going on before the little ones started showing up. With that in mind, maybe the topic can return to the original thread topic, eh?

[TriOmegaZero]

Hey, I just went with the flow. Anyone want to dispute my stance that concealment should not negate sneak attack on a hit?

[Pathos]

Dispute your stance? Nope... "partail concealment (i.e. 20% miss-change) should not stop sneak attacks. Total concealment... yeah, they should.

EDIT: Oh yeah.. how smurf-tastic.

[mdt]

Ross Byers wrote:

While I'm not opposed to the occasional tiny blue thread, it seems like this one actually had a meaningful conversation going on before the little ones started showing up. With that in mind, maybe the topic can return to the original thread topic, eh?

I don't care if it went off topic. I gave up on the thread when the first 5 people to respond got upset about me 'adding limitations to a rogue' when the whole post was about modifying the ability so it could be used in all situations, but with a failure rate for concealment.

I'm not sure how modifying it so the rogue can use it for sneak attacking into concealment is nerfing the rogue, but hey, I know when to take my chips and go home.