
![]() |

Stuart Lean wrote:Does it still equate to 16 assloads?Patrick Walsh wrote:It has made it across the pond to the UK. I use Metric F-ton's all the time.See also ton, metric ton, and long ton (or tonne). (Metric F-ton is a regional unit centered in the Philly/New Jersey area.)
Properly, 20 assloads = 1 Metric F-ton.
This parallels the Imperial and US Customary measurements:
Imperial: 20 hundredweight(UK) = 1 tonne (or long ton) = 2240 lb
US Customary" 20 hundredweight (US) = 1 tin (or short ton) = 2000 lb
The difference between the long and short tons is that the US set a hundredweight = 100 lb, while the Imperial retained 112 lb.
A metric ton (used in the metric and SI systems) = 1000 kg = 2200 lb
So when an engineer says something weights 3500 tons, you may need to ask which "ton" they're using.

![]() |

Stuart Lean wrote:Does it still equate to 16 assloads?Patrick Walsh wrote:It has made it across the pond to the UK. I use Metric F-ton's all the time.See also ton, metric ton, and long ton (or tonne). (Metric F-ton is a regional unit centered in the Philly/New Jersey area.)
That'd be the Metric F-tonne vs the Imperial Arseload over here, yes :P.