
Basilforth |

Not sorry again for noob question. :)
So, I am reading about the use of skills, trained and untrained.
First, untrained means you have a rank of zero (0) ? Correct?
I fully understand why some skills required training. Though I am confuzzuled why the Beta book shows spellcasting as a skill that can be used untrained. A little less confuzzled as to why the crafting skills can be used untrained.
It appears that you can use skills in which you are untrained without penalty. You simply have a rank of zero (0), correct? That seems pretty generous? Why no penalty?
Also, if I can use a skill untrained, do my ability modifiers affect the use of that skill. Seems like they should not help, but could hinder if I have low ability scores. I am sure that these questions have been asked before, I am jest wondering.
What is a cross-class skill? I done search my Beta pdf and there are no hits on cross class skills, but it shows up on the spreadsheet I am using.

Jon Arason |

Not sorry again for noob question. :)
So, I am reading about the use of skills, trained and untrained.
First, untrained means you have a rank of zero (0) ? Correct?
Correct.
I fully understand why some skills required training. Though I am confuzzuled why the Beta book shows spellcasting as a skill that can be used untrained. A little less confuzzled as to why the crafting skills can be used untrained.
You raise an interesting point there. The 3.5 rules say Spellcraft cannot be used untrained. I'm as confused as you are about the change. And as for using craft skills untrained.. well that beats me too.
It appears that you can use skills in which you are untrained without penalty. You simply have a rank of zero (0), correct? That seems pretty generous? Why no penalty?
Also, if I can use a skill untrained, do my ability modifiers affect the use of that skill. Seems like they should not help, but could hinder if I have low ability scores. I am sure that these questions have been asked before, I am jest wondering.
Yes, ability modifiers do come into play for untrained skill use.
What is a cross-class skill? I done search my Beta pdf and there are no hits on cross class skills, but it shows up on the spreadsheet I am using.
A cross-class skill is a skill that does not appear in a class skill list. For example, looking at table 5-4 in the Beta, Disable Device is a cross-class skill for every class except the Rogue

Basilforth |

A cross-class skill is a skill that does not appear in a class skill list. For example, looking at table 5-4 in the Beta, Disable Device is a cross-class skill for every class except the Rogue
Ah! A cross-class skill is any skill that is not a class skill, correct?
So, any class can conceivably train in any skill (subject to DM approval, natch)?

KaeYoss |

Though I am confuzzuled why the Beta book shows spellcasting as a skill that can be used untrained.
That's spellcraft, not spellcasting. Spellcraft lets you identify spells, not cast them.
It appears that you can use skills in which you are untrained without penalty. You simply have a rank of zero (0), correct? That seems pretty generous? Why no penalty?
Why a penalty? Basically, such checks are simple ability checks. Climb check without ranks? It's a simple strength check.
The fact that you don't get ranks are often penalty enough, and many skills (and specific uses of skills) are not possible at all without training.
Also, if I can use a skill untrained, do my ability modifiers affect the use of that skill. Seems like they should not help, but could hinder if I have low ability scores.
Yes, they do affect. I think they should. To use my previous example, a strong guy is better at getting over that wall than a weak one, even if he never trained climbing.

Basilforth |

Basilforth wrote:
Though I am confuzzuled why the Beta book shows spellcasting as a skill that can be used untrained.That's spellcraft, not spellcasting. Spellcraft lets you identify spells, not cast them.
Basilforth wrote:
It appears that you can use skills in which you are untrained without penalty. You simply have a rank of zero (0), correct? That seems pretty generous? Why no penalty?Why a penalty? Basically, such checks are simple ability checks. Climb check without ranks? It's a simple strength check.
The fact that you don't get ranks are often penalty enough, and many skills (and specific uses of skills) are not possible at all without training.
Basilforth wrote:Yes, they do affect. I think they should. To use my previous example, a strong guy is better at getting over that wall than a weak one, even if he never trained climbing.
Also, if I can use a skill untrained, do my ability modifiers affect the use of that skill. Seems like they should not help, but could hinder if I have low ability scores.
Awesome, Kae, thanks for the responses, that all makes sense.

Justin Ricobaldi |

Basilforth wrote:I fully understand why some skills required training. Though I am confuzzuled why the Beta book shows spellcasting as a skill that can be used untrained. A little less confuzzled as to why the crafting skills can be used untrained.You raise an interesting point there. The 3.5 rules say Spellcraft cannot be used untrained. I'm as confused as you are about the change. And as for using craft skills untrained.. well that beats me too.
Well, you see spellcraft is something you learn at like wizards school or something. spellcraft in a way is like a field use of knowledge arcana. Also, the crat skill is not a trained skill because it can be attempted by anyone. If I gave you some wooden boards, nails, and tools and said "make me a table" without training you'd at least be able to give it a shot and come up with something table like even if not a very good table.