![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
Basiliv |
![Hala](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/Hala.jpg)
Great issue guys, bravo. I nearly teared up reading the farewells from Jason, Mike, Wes, and Erik. And how cool was Holian's "Treasures of Greyhawk"? Yeah, Gary!
But I have to admit that I've been looking forward to this Apocrypha article the most. And so far it's wonderful...but it seems to be missing something (unless I am, which is entirely possible).
All demon lords are one of the three known demonic races, and thus the creature gains the loumara, obyrith, or tanar'ri sub-type as well, along with all the abilities and traits for that sub-type.
The article then goes on to discuss the Forms of Madness for obyriths...and that's it. There's no mention of the abilities or traits for the other two sub-types, it just moves on to discuss Hit Dice.
Are these in Fiendish Codex I? If so, that makes perfect sense. If not, any chance of posting those on your site? :-)
I just figured the only way to end my confusion was to ask -- no big deal. I can't wait for Pathfinder guys, please keep up the great work!!
![](/WebObjects/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/wait30.gif)
Rick Miller Contributor |
![Agath](http://cdn.paizo.com/image/avatar/Agat_finish.jpg)
Great issue guys, bravo. And how cool was Holian's "Treasures of Greyhawk"? Yeah, Gary!
As co-author (Rick "Duicarthan" Miller) of that article I loved writing up those magic items. That was some fun stuff. The robe of the mad archmage goes really far back into my home campaigns before 3e even came out.
By far though, I like Nolzur's orb the best b/c it was one of those things that was just a fun item!