
Aaron Bitman |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Oz is well worth discussing, in my opinion. In my mind the 14 "core" Oz books were the first modern fantasy series, pre-dating Howard's and Tolkien's earliest works. Before Oz, there were fairy tales, but this was something different. The Oz series gave us grand epics (by children's standards, anyway). "The Land of Oz" showed us that Oz was a PLACE, where life went on even in Dorothy's absence. When I, as a child, picked up an Oz book, I could escape into what felt like a real yet magical world, in which I could actually believe, at least until I put the book down. (Most other fantasies of the time didn't do that for me. For instance, Lewis Carroll's "Alice" books clearly described some kind of dream, or drug trip.)
Oz was definitely my favorite series during my elementary school years. It began my interest in fantasy (which ultimately led me to this website, among many other things). I read those 14 books at least 4 times each. I read over a dozen of Baum's other books as well, and over a dozen Oz books by later authors.
Yeah, I can discuss it.

Hitdice |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Aw man, I thought we were talking about about novelizations of the HBO series!
But seriously, I'm not sure it's possible to overstate the importance of the Oz books. It's similar to the way everyone calls Superman the first superhero, and completely discounts Popeye, who's been doing super powered stuff in a newspaper strip (without eating spinach, most of the time) for around a decade before Superman was published.

Doodlebug Anklebiter |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Stream-of-consciousness-wise, for some reason that made me think of this sketch that I just saw recently.
Sorry for the derail (not!). I also loved all the Oz books as a kid. Don't know if I read all 40, but I read a lot of them.

Aaron Bitman |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

It's similar to the way everyone calls Superman the first superhero, and completely discounts Popeye, who's been doing super powered stuff in a newspaper strip (without eating spinach, most of the time) for around a decade before Superman was published.
Yeah, I wouldn't call the original Popeye stuff superhero material. I started reading E. C. Segar's earliest Popeye stories in the "Thimble Theatre" strips, and he didn't usually save people. More often, he would just walk up to someone and punch him for no reason. "I yam what I yam" was originally his answer to any criticism he got for that defect. That guy had serious aggression issues.
But then, I got disgusted with that strip and dropped it pretty quickly. Maybe Segar wrote Popeye better later. I wouldn't know.

Hitdice |

When you say earliest Popeye strips, are you talking about when the strip was called Popeye ('cause the character was so popular that Segar renamed it), or have you read it from the beginning, back when it was just about the lives and loves of the Oyl family under the title Thimble Theatre? Thimble Theatre struggled along for years and years, but once Segar introduced Popeye, the world demanded that he rename the comic and license it for cartoons, like, immediately.
Anyhow, my point was that everyone (critics) ignores Popeye in the genealogy of superheroes just the way they (critics again) ignore the Oz books in the development of the fantasy genre.

Doodlebug Anklebiter |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Re-reading the Gore essay, he talks about how after the success of the first Oz book, Baum (who had a background in theater) successfully adapted it to the stage and that, in Gore's opinion, many of the bad jokes and Dorothy's lapse into baby-talk was the influence of vaudeville and other stage-y stuff as Baum wrote them with the intention of adapting them to the stage (the female soldiers as a chorus line, etc.).
That may be the single worst sentence I've ever written, but I'm tired.

Aaron Bitman |

@Hitdice: I was talking about Popeye's earliest appearances in Thimble Theatre, starting in 1929. In fact, I started the Thimble Theatre stuff with 1928, thanks to Fantagraphics' series of Popeye reprints. (I tried to clarify that by editing my post to say "E. C. Segar's earliest Popeye stories in the 'Thimble Theatre' strips", but you may have typed up your message before I made that revision.)
And my point was that I'm one of those "everyone" critics who would ignore Popeye in the genealogy of superheroes, although I wouldn't ignore Oz in the development of fantasy. I guess Popeye just doesn't fit my definition of superhero. But other people could have equally valid definitions, according to which Popeye was a superhero, and Oz wasn't a fantasy series.

Hitdice |

Okay, sure, so long as you've read Thimble Theatre, I think we're probably on the same page. I just think it's really tough to think of a definition of superhero that doesn't include Popeye, and he predates Superman. Then again, if you want to call Popeye the first superanti-hero, I'm fine with that. :)

thejeff |
Okay, sure, so long as you've read Thimble Theatre, I think we're probably on the same page. I just think it's really tough to think of a definition of superhero that doesn't include Popeye, and he predates Superman. Then again, if you want to call Popeye the first superanti-hero, I'm fine with that. :)
Doesn't wear tights. No secret identity. Doesn't really fight crime. Not really all that heroic and doesn't hit many of the Superhero tropes.
Kind of a precursor, but there were plenty of those.
The only real thing that distinguishes him from many of the other comic characters of the day is that he had spinach based superpowers.
Or that's how I remember it anyway. I haven't read any early Popeye in years.

Hitdice |

The thing that made Superman a superhero was all the times he got shot by criminals, right in the chest, and the bullets bounced off!! Popeye was doing that junk years beforehand, and coming back with the pithy line, "Whattya these're button holes?"
I guess I'm saying that super-powers work at a certain level of absurdity that can only really exist in the funny papers.

Dragonchess Player |

Staying in a light-hearted vein, I'll probably dig out Harry Turtledove's Gerin the Fox series (Werenight, Prince of the North, King of the North, and Fox and Empire) to help fill in the time until Cauldron of Ghosts (Weber & Eric Flint) is released.
I guess I timed that about perfectly. Finished the Gerin the Fox series earlier this week and picked up Cauldron of Ghosts today.

Dragonchess Player |

Re: Oz books.
L. Frank Baum was one of the authors that got me started reading. I read all 14 of the "core" books and some of the others (I think I stopped somewhere in the 20s); however, by that point I was moving on to other authors (Madeline L'Engle, C. S. Lewis, Anne McCaffrey, Allen Dean Foster, J. R. R. Tolkien, etc.) and my tastes were changing. Also, as I found out later, the "additional" Oz books weren't written by Baum.

Judy Bauer Associate Editor |

Loved the Oz books when I was a kid; read dozens. Tried to go back to them a few years ago, but had a hard time getting into them again for some of the reasons mentioned above (racial caricatures, dated portrayals of gender rolls) as well as being creeped out by how blasé the characters are about death and maiming. (Makes sense in context, but when you think about it as an adult—eeeeee! See also this.) But I still wish I could grow a lunchpail tree!
Also! Breaking up my slow-motion Decameron reading with Nnedi Okorafor's Akata Witch (Nigerian urban fantasy) and Molly Gloss's The Jump-Off Creek.

Limeylongears |

I put my time on the book thread's Naughty Step to good use - finished God Emperor of Didcot by Toby Frost, which was very silly and enjoyable, and Two Women in One by Nawal el-Saadawi. Now on Chapayev by Dmitri Furmanov and have Demon in the Mirror by Andrew J Offut to look forward to. Two words: *Vampire Nuns*. Enough said.

Doodlebug Anklebiter |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Also started reading Under the Black Flag which, alas, is not about anarcho-syndicalists nor Henry Rollins.

Doodlebug Anklebiter |

Moved on to the last third of the second Corum trilogy. Also pulled out the Mike Mignola Fafhrd and Gray Mouser comic series again which, conveniently ends right before the book where I left off--the wererat one--so I'm thinking I'll finish up Leiber after Moorcock and then, I think, it's back to Gaskell to finish up the Cija books.
Some great stories in the pirates book, of course. Maybe I'll post some of them later.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Got up to the point in Moorcock's The Oak and the Ram where I was so rudely interrupted by thieves last year at Socialist Summer Camp.
Down with the Fhoi Myore!
For workers revolution to smash that punk in upstate in NY who stole my stuff!
Down with private ownership!
I've been on an uneventful 12-hour night shift in a place where I can't have electronics. I've been working my way through the Planet Stories line and so far I've finished Gygax's Infernal Sorceress, Henry Kuttner's Elak of Atlantis and The Dark World, and Moorcock's Masters of the Pit. Working on City of Spiders right now.
Of these, Gygax was an unexpected delight. He went full 1E with a myriad of polearm names and castle terminology, although the in-universe terms for various forms of magic were a bit distracting.
Elak wasn't very good. It read like Cliff Notes of a REH novel. The plot just progressed too fast with too little exposition. The Dark World was much better; lots of interesting villains and a big, clever twist on the ordinary guy transported to a magical world trope.
Even when he is consciously pastiching ERB, Moorcock is, of course, Moorcock, and his Mars books deliver.

Kirth Gersen |

Reposted here from wherever I inadvertently put it the first time:
Steven Brust's and Skyler White's The Incrementalists. I normally hate co-written novels, but in this case it reads like Steve does the male lead's narrative and Skyler the female's, and it works seamlessly.
About 65% through; so far it's one of Brust's very best, back to the kinds of stuff he was playing with in Cowboy Feng's and Agyar (both of which it strongly reminds me of).

Limeylongears |

Chapayev ended with everyone being massacred by Cossacks, which was kind of depressing; seeing as misery loves company, I've now started reading a compilation of existentialist stories (sorry, fictions, just in case you were expecting to be entertained). We've had De Sade, Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky so far. Well worth 50p.

Doodlebug Anklebiter |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Leigh Brackett is the shiznit.
Held off on the last chapter of The Sword and the Stallion because I got the distinctive feeling that, like in the last chapter of many Moorcock seriesesses, everyone is going to die.
EDIT: Correction, last two chapters. [Sobs]
Got out my tissues, and am going to sit down and finish it now. After that, I'm moving on to the Illustrated Junior Library edition of The Wizard of Oz that my grammie gave me when I was a wee goblin and I found in one of my boxes.

Aaron Bitman |

Back in the day, I used to read Alan Dean Foster's "Humanx" books for old-fashioned space opera. (That title referred to the Humanx Commonwealth, an alliance between humans and the insectoid Thranx.) It was nothing brilliant, but if I just wanted a simple story with intelligent aliens and faster-than-light space travel, Foster could provide one as well as the next author.
Many of those books featured a character named Flinx. I read the first nine Flinx books, and the first ten Humanx books that didn't feature Flinx. When I got that far, I felt that the author was running out of ideas, and the series was running too thin.
But when I'm in the mood for that sort of thing, I can still dig out my old Humanx collection. I finished re-reading the first three Flinx books ("The Tar-Aiym Krang", "Bloodhype", and "Orphan Star"), and I'm now up to the last chapter of the fourth ("The End of the Matter".)

Tinkergoth |

If we're talking Alan Dean Foster... It's Spellsinger, all the way. Still love those books, and I scour any second hand bookstores that I find looking for the ones that have eluded me all these years. Now and then I get lucky. So hammy, and so much fun (particularly for those who love music as much as I do).
The first one has some of my favourite moments in it, particularly when Jon-Tom tries to conjure up a car for transport by singing a few Beach Boys songs and playing his new duar (the instrument he channels magic through), but the magic twists what he's after since a car has no place in a world of talking animals and sorcery... so he gets a giant riding snake, instead.
Rule of Funny tends to be in place for many of the spells effects, they'll generally do what he wants to accomplish, but in an unexpected way.
And then you have the demonic spellsinging band that show up later, playing music that "arises from the deepest well of confusion, from the black pits where unpleasant songs of sorrow and despair mix together to form the most depressing soul-suffocating sludge", which turns out to be Country.
Actually, sod it. I'm going to spend my long weekend re-reading those books.