![]() ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() I'm actually curious to see how they handle troop pawns; making it one 3x3/4x4 token works, but limits the troops ability to spread out with Form Up. It says "plentiful," but also "large," so I'm not sure.
![]()
Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() ZOOWEEMAMA wrote: Others are free to have their own opinions, but the lack of respect shown here today is exactly why I'll be sticking to the subreddit for any discussion I'm seeking. The vote system is a necessity in filtering out all the haters. I'm usually a subreddit-only Andy, but even their thread announcing this errata is a little caustic and overly-sarcastic for my tastes. Not trying to tone police anybody, and critical feedback is obviously... Well, critical. But the amount of snark and assumption and doom-posting is just... tiring. Happens every time there's an announcement, too, the most recent being the Impossible Playtest. Maybe just wait until you see the thing to be disappointed, guys -- there's no prize for being first in that race. These boards can be even worse, which is why I only dive in maybe once or twice a month.I can also only imagine that it's harder to take tone-deaf or caustic feedback as seriously as more level-headed critique, regardless of its actual merit. But honestly, I have no idea because I can't even imagine being the guy who has to help aggregate playtest feedback. Sterner stuff, for sure. Sorry for the whinging; just needed to get that off my chest. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() H2Osw wrote:
I preordered Godsrain when it was first announced, which is why it was in the sidecart. It was added to the order with my subscriptions for this month. It just doesn't usually take this long between me getting the initial order submission email and the shipping notification email... which isn't helped by now impatient I am to get my hands on the Exemplar, haha. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() I know it's a little messy, but I kind of hope live wire heightens by 1d4 with every rank, alternating between slashing and electricity. Having to wait 4 levels for your cantrip to catch up in damage feels kind of bleh. Also, highly unlikely and arguably off-topic, but I hope that Metal Elemental Sorcerers get live wire as one of their sorcerous gifts. I know that electric arc is considered the best cantrip, but live wire feels more fitting.
... Oh yeah, errata. Mauler Dedication (pg 207) uses "Strength 14" for its prerequisite instead of "Strength +2" to align with the new attributes. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() Minor typo noted in the Player Guide: on page 12 under "Suggested Character Options," the last column header says "Skills," but the previous column has the same title and the text in the last column looks more like Feats or Archetypes. Still, I'm really interested to see how this AP turns out! Might run my Abomination Vaults group through after they finish that adventure sometime this decade, haha. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() Nice! I feel like the Champion has some room to grow with its early-level feats, and oaths were always a bit niche by definition. So I think expanding base level feats and saving oaths/litanies for later is a good call. And the causes sound neat; I'm especially curious about Grandeur. It's also great to see more abilities roped into its aura -- just makes sense. Shield of Spirit is also a really flavorful defensive option! I'm curious if you can pick it up later, or if it's a choice you make at chargen with your deity? Excited regardless! The Champion was in a good spot already, and it's only looking better. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() Frankly, I think full spellcasters just need to emulate martial weapon scaling for their spell attacks/DCs, then Legendary at level 17 or so. It'll still fall behind martials slightly without potency runes, but it'll at least lessen the gap at levels 5-7 and 13-15. A gate attenuator-like item bonus to DCs would also be neat -- maybe tie them to a tradition and limit them to one per user (like apex items) if you want to reign them in a little and specialize. Both together might be a bit rough, and Kineticist might be a little miffed with the change. But even without these, I think magic is in an okay spot. The problems largely iron out as you level up and get more items and spell slots. Alchemists have a similar problem, though I think it takes them longer to get to a better spot. ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() Andrew White wrote:
Sorry to pester, but it's been a month. Are there any updates on these soundtracks releasing? ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() I had a similar situation to a lot of folks here -- swapped to a hardcover from my subscription, ended up getting delayed shipping and no PDF. Thankfully customer service was very quick to confirm my order HAD actually shipped and then add the PDF to my account manually. So just each out to CS if you're having any issues, any issues! ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() HK_ wrote: I could imagine a particularly old fortune dragon being almost entirely immobile due to all the precious metals melted onto itself over the years. Making a once fiersome dragon become easy pickings for other more opportunistic dragons, creatures or even adventurers. Ooooh, I'm getting Pacific Rim vibes. A colony of rust monsters could chip away layers of drained and dulled treasure from a great fortune wyrm, cleaning it like remoras for a great shark. Symbiotic parasites! ![]()
Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() The Harrow is an aspect of the game/setting I've been really interested in lately, so I'm glad to see this AP leaning so hard into it! (Might even pick up the physical deck)
![]()
Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() The Painted Oryx wrote:
Agreed. I understand that not everyone is great at giving coherent or useful feedback, but it feels so... Low-effort to just drop a review score without any actual opinions to explain it. It's entirely possible the reason they didn't enjoy it is one that would make me even more excited to play/run the module, but you'd just never know.![]()
Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Lost Omens Subscriber
![]() Really promising update. More timely errata is a huge boon. While I get waiting for a reprint, there are too many minor changes that need to be done that just weren't getting out (Arcane Cascade, looking at you).
Glad to see Paizo keeps improving. |