So here is my question. If I hit with a sneak attack and inflict for example 5 damages + 30 of sneak attack to an enemy with damage reduction 10/-, how much damage do I inflict? The two scenarios I can think of are:
And another hypothesis would be that since 5 is not enough to overcome the DR, I do not inflict any damage at all. Thanks for your help
Red Ramage wrote: To which I ask: Why not just play a fighter? Oh well, without going into the details I am running an experimental project with a bunch of my dearest friends and long-time RPG buddies. We have a small party of three: fighter, wizard, and cleric. Since my friends wanted to play the other roles the most, I volunteered to cover the divine spellcaster spot, but I am determined not to give up damage dealing capabilities.
A highly regarded expert wrote:
Yeah, I am already discussing with my GM about it, but I am not sure it will be allow as we will not play in PF campaign setting. Good call!
Red Ramage wrote:
Silence and Hold Person are just not effective. They have ST and SR and when enemies become truly powerful you strike them down just with melee or heavy spellcasting damage (I do not know PF, but I was used to cast Polar Ray and Sonic Orb with metamagic feats applied, as they do not require SR...). If I cannot create a character that somehow does one of this two things, I just don't have fun. As I was saying I probably played too much, and now my view is quite narrow minded.
Red Ramage wrote:
These are all good considerations and I appreciate them. Let's say that I probably played d20 Fantasy RPG too much and I cannot enjoy anymore some aspects of the game like the ones you mentioned. What I am thinking is: what will I do against an enemy who has AC 40, all savings at +30, after I got hit by a successful dispel magic or even worst a disjunction? But I guess I am going off-topic here...Anyway, if anybody figures out other ways to increase my attack roll bonus, I will be happy to hear those.
Adamantine Dragon wrote: due to their abilities to buff themselves. Well, let me say that with the PF Divine Power, my "poor" cleric is short of a +6 strength bonus (not that easy to get through magic items at level 7) and the bonus from Divine Favor (which does not stack). If you add that casting spells requires time, I do not really know how a cleric can ever be superior to a Fighter (which again, gets one feat per level and other nice skills related to armor/weapon usage). Basically the cleric lost power without any replacement, and all the melee characters where enhanced. But as you said, you like it and it is fine, while I simply don't :D After this discussion at least I am sure I did not miss any major Pathfinder option to enhance my melee cleric. Thanks
Adamantine Dragon wrote: If you want full BAB equivalence, then paly a full BAB class. But then you'll have other trade-offs, like not being able to cast "miracle" later in the game... I guess you are right, but please be sympathetic: coming to Pathfinder from 3.5E it is shocking. I am still trying to understand what are the melee capabilities and limits for cleric/druid/etc. in Pathfinder, since fighter and barbarian seem really strong in comparison (especially the fighter which gets a feat every level...).
Thanks Sean, that was helpful, and yes, I am familiar with the "stacking" concept, which is why I was very disappointed in seeing Divine Favor and Divine Power both providing luck bonus, because the second seems to me just a stronger version of the first, and not an option for some fancy "combo". Sean Mahoney wrote: Also keep in mind that until you are at really high levels your BAB difference with someone who is full BAB is not real significant. I am not a master of statistics, but I am not sure I agree on this point. In my previous experience with the d20 system, no caster could match a melee character without a significant boost via spells, and here in Pathfinder there are not really a lot of appealing options (at least in my opinion). Anyway, in the last couple of hours I put together what I think is a decent battle cleric build, which I am quite confident will keep me somehow effective in melee combat as we advance in level. Hopefully I am right about it... Thanks again
First of all, I tried to look for this information by myself both in the rulebooks, SRD, and forum threads, but I was not very successful or at least non quite satisfied by the results.
I appreciate your help.
wraithstrike wrote:
I did not think it was such a big deal. I would undo my actions if I could. I interacted directly with the staff for other RPGs in the past and I was just trying to do the same here. Again, apologies. Are we cool now?
Mabven the OP healer wrote: You are entirely unlikely to get a developer response here, and mort is exactly correct. The rule of thumb is - if a feat/spell/ability alters any previous feat/spell/ability, it only alters it in the ways which are explicit in the text of the feat/spell/ability, and any additional changes you may infer because of similarities to other feats/spells/abilities are incorrect. Thank you. The rule of thumb makes sense, and now I feel like this feat is less useful than I thought.
blackbloodtroll wrote: First of all, calling out developers or staff is a sure way to get ignored by the way. The ability to spontaneously cast cure or inflict is tied, but a separate class ability. You do not gain the ability to spontaneously cast inflict spell. Well I am new of this forum, but since in the FAQ they are explicit about non sending direct messages to the staff I did not know how else getting an official feedback from Paizo. Thanks for the feedback guys.
Well I appreciate your feedback, but if possible I would still like the game developers to confirm.
@Paizo Staff I have seen that the penalty you take for using Power Attack increases with the Base Attack Bonus. My question is, does having a -3 penalty (i.e. BAB=8) mean that I can take up to a -3 malus on attack rolls, or I am forced to take the entire -3 penalty each time I am using Power Attack? Thanks
@Paizo Staff, but anybody is welcome to give her opinion. Here is my question. Suppose I am playing a cleric, channeling positive energy, and I select Versatile Channeler as a feat. Now I can channel negative energy as well, as a cleric of level = actual level -2. Does it mean that now I can also spontaneously cast "inflict wound" spells as a cleric of level = actual level -2? Since spontaneous casting is based on channeling energy, I thought that my idea makes at least some sense. Thanks |