Pale Stranger

Tyriphian the Thread Psychopomp's page

31 posts. Alias of breithauptclan.


RSS


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Deriven Firelion wrote:
I brought this thread up because John R said a dev ruled on this.

siegfriedliner posted the developer's thoughts on the matter in this thread ... seven months ago.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
steelhead wrote:
YuriP wrote:
Oh a resurrection of a topic from CRB 1st print era! kkkk
Not everyone has been on these boards since CRB 1st print era.

No, but everyone can learn to read the dates of postings.

Not everyone who has contributed to a thread from the distant past is still here to be communicated with.


No one knows.


Fascinating.


5 people marked this as a favorite.
Claxon wrote:
Some year on, coming back to this idea and I actually think the alternative scores are worse balanced than the original.

It was five years ago. And your analysis may explain why it was not reprinted.


4 people marked this as a favorite.
Bluemagetim wrote:
Is there any reason to not just count the number of focus spells you have and make that your total focus points(limited 3 total)?

Only when speaking to the echoes of the past.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

For everyone and everything there is a time to die.

Many mortals are surprised that there is a psychopomp psychopomp. The rock psychopomp occasionally complains of boredom. Recently the deity psychopomp nearly became emotional from having a task to perform.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Be aware that this thread was revived. Much of the information given previously is out of date.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Bot spam is the bane of my existence.


*sigh*

More bot thread revival.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

If the technology involves spam bots, then it should stay buried and lost in Numeria.


4 people marked this as a favorite.

*Glares menacingly and walks away*


Tempest_Knight wrote:
so what is this thread about?

Originally it was about the length of time of Breath Weapon abilities. Specifically when the ability can be used again.

You are the best person to announce the purpose of your revival of the thread after nearly a year.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

At least this thread had only been dead slightly less than a year before it was revived by the spam bot "Whats1953".


Ravingdork wrote:
Lightning Raven wrote:
If your group thinks is too cumbersome to use the current feats, just fully heal their HP for free after a fight ends. Problem solved and no homebrew involved.
lolwut? That's still homebrew!

And this is why this should have been a new thread.


To note: This thread is over four years gone. Please leave the echoes of the past in the past.


*sigh*

Everyone move along. Nothing to see here.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Yes, this is homebrew and should have been created in, or moved, to that subforum.

This thread appears to have exceeded its life span and is just causing contention. I will remind everyone that the 'hide this thread' option will help to send it to its rest.


Dr. Frank Funkelstein wrote:
Ranged Paladin resurrected, hussah!

Mmm... It appears that I need to have a discussion with my administration department. This is not my jurisdiction.


It was changed in the 3rd printing of the Core Rulebook.


This thread should never have existed to begin with. I do not even want it in the boneyard.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Congratulations on the character building decisions.

Was it really necessary to revive this thread for that?


3 people marked this as a favorite.
SuperParkourio wrote:
Baarogue wrote:
2019
What about 2019?

You are attempting to converse with echoes of the distant past.


Ravingdork wrote:
Resurrecting this thread as now I'd like to know how the Gliding armor rune works in conjunction with things like an awakened flying animal's Take Flight feat.

Since it is your own thread, that is acceptable. The mention of its resurrection is appreciated as well.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

I must also mention that most of this thread is almost four years dead.


None of that seems relevant to the original purpose of this thread. Start a new thread in the advice or general discussion forums if you wish. But let this thread return to its rest.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

It is a reasonable reason to revive a thread. But it is good to note that the previous messages are just echoes from the past that often cannot and should not be interacted with.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Again?

Can everyone at least be respectful to the echoes of the past posted years ago.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
QuidEst wrote:
I'm gonna ask that people take any discussion of necroing to this thread on the topic that nobody has posted in for two years.

*Glares silently in disapproval*


5 people marked this as a favorite.

This thread has been dead for almost four years. Perhaps it is best to leave it to its rest.