![]() ![]()
Pathfinder Rulebook, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
![]() Elfteiroh wrote: They are basically Isekai protagonists... :P I guess some Jotunborns will be "transported" against their will and will be a little less... motivated than our iconic here, and will want to live an easy-going live with their cheat abi... oh wait. They don't get cheat abilities. Oops. xD Mythic powers are right there if you want the full Isekai experience. heh. ![]()
Pathfinder Rulebook, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
![]() I think one thing DPR as a focus can generate is a feeling that if you're not at X DPR level then you're messing up/ playing it wrong etc, and I believe that's not the overall experience PF2e is trying to generate for players. Look, there are games where DPR/DPS/etc matters a *LOT* but I think the damage to the social aspect (especially in places like society play) far outweighs the benefit of a focus on DPR/DPS as a community. the funny thing is? You *can* do both in this space. Easily. but you have to be aware that folks are going to tell you DPR doesn't matter because if it does? things like "Optimal build paths" begin to matter, and that's not the vibe PF2e is going for. I can understand the frustration, and the vibe of the community means a lot, and if the vibe is rejecting DPR/DPS as a metric for tracking class balance, etc? There might be a reason for that. ![]()
Pathfinder Rulebook, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
![]() Finoan wrote:
I have to say that I agree with this take. I don't see a way to balance Mythic VS Non-Mythic characters currently, so I largely Don't care that it's balanced, at least in the specific context of mythic play. It's sign posted, if I say "This game is going to be Mythic" then everyone should know to not expect everything to be balanced perfectly. It's the nature of mythic play. As someone who hand converted most of Wrath of the Righteous to 2e (We changed the ending for our table)? I'm very excited to see what they do. Even if they use the more video game based paths rather than the more generic path names (I liked that better, personally) ![]()
Pathfinder Rulebook, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
![]() Hilary Moon Murphy wrote:
I'm gonna say this and I hope people understand my words: Not calling a thing what it is? that is allowing room for bigotry and fascism to grow. simple as that. so any advocation, at all, of not calling bigots, bigots, is at best, being a racist collaborator. at worst, you're actively fueling the bigotry by allowing it to pass without harsh scrutiny. So when I see this post, fellow freelancer or not? I see someone advocating for "softened language" and "No flame wars" or whatever? because said people aren't being banned immediately for their bigotted horse crap? I see someone capitulating to fascism and bigotry. that's it that's all. this quote CONTINUES to be true. "....I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great
|