although all possibilities are all good and well, as a dm you can move heaven and earth. so giving a familiar would be possible too.
i would take notice of the fact that the rogue isnt playing a role. i keep track and when a session ends the characters get no added incentives for great and compelling roleplay.
ryric wrote:
Grinn... yes... i would like that :D No they are not evil. And the paladin is a stubborn dwarf who judges people by their actions so... in a sense he says already the right things. :)ryric wrote: We just started that same AP and our group has a dhampir summoner, a paladin, and a cleric of Pharasma. nice.. i like all those fun combinations! ryric wrote: Even if his eidolon is modeled after the Grim Reaper from Castlevania. LOL... ryric wrote: There will probably be a lot more problems with the sorcerer who wants to delve into Things Man Was Not Meant To Know. Sorcerers ... almost as bad as oracle lore or wizards ;) ryric wrote: I would remind the paladin player that while the dhampir are tainted by undeath, they are not truly undead, just kinda cursed. he wanted to aid with bunny band-aid's so i think where ok there :D Thanks for your reply!
SunsetPsychosis wrote:
My idea.. they (story writers) also warn that it will be a more challenging play. The players are PbP and i know some of them The ones i do know are fully capable of running the show. (they didn't engage in a fight with each other... yet) SunsetPsychosis wrote:
Thanks for your response! It helps me to bring things into perspective.
Hello,
but... One of the other players wanted to play a paladin. no big deal you would say. He is against Undead (oathbound vs undead) So as a DM i have a challenge. I already had a challenge with the damphir versus all the evil they have to fight. but now the challenge is even bigger. i can simply disallow the damphir, but to me that would be a no-no. Just like ruling out the core class paladin. also a no-no. i see the party as somwhat similar to the "buffy the vampire slayer" or "angel". good and evil working together for a greater goal. i'm not going to rule out anything, but i would like to hear what other players or dm/gm might have to say as advice about a similar situation. (in relation to the carrion crown adventure path)
Kilbourne wrote: It functions however you like; the mechanics are merely called "Challenge", but you can flavor it any way you wish. :-) first, thanks for answering me.When i would be the DM in that game i could. But... i am not.
It just made me think... If i could only challenge honorable men... then i would not have much use of a challenge.
Hi,
When a cavalier challenges a enemy, does the enemy have to answer to the challenge? or is the enemy challenged anyway?
Personally i would see it more like this:
thanks!
Cool :-)
yeah i know.. i'm weird... but i guess LPJ doesn't mind, paizo doesn't mind, my gamers definetly don't mind, my wife minds, but i don't listen to her (when its about gaming). so.... euhm... lets see those spells.
I am from Almere
|