Sentro's page

Hello,
I'm in progress of starting up an adventure path and i ran into a silly trap.
two of my players wanted to play a dhampir as they are mentioned in the player guide. So i allowed them to play that race.
now i know there are challenges in playing such a class and i am sure that the players are up to the roleplay.

but...

One of the other players wanted to play a paladin. no big deal you would say. He is against Undead (oathbound vs undead)

So as a DM i have a challenge. I already had a challenge with the damphir versus all the evil they have to fight. but now the challenge is even bigger.

i can simply disallow the damphir, but to me that would be a no-no. Just like ruling out the core class paladin. also a no-no.

i see the party as somwhat similar to the "buffy the vampire slayer" or "angel". good and evil working together for a greater goal.

i'm not going to rule out anything, but i would like to hear what other players or dm/gm might have to say as advice about a similar situation. (in relation to the carrion crown adventure path)

Hi,
i know an human azlanti pureblood get +2 on all abilities but does it also get another +2 to ONE bility from bieng human?

Hi,
a question about a cavalier challenging a enemy:

When a cavalier challenges a enemy, does the enemy have to answer to the challenge? or is the enemy challenged anyway?
In some cases (like hitting another knight with the glove to challenge, the other one has to respond to the challenge, a somewhat classical approach and only usable in very specific situations)

Personally i would see it more like this:
recalling a scene in 'first knight' (just as an example) where the hero (lancelot) challenges the enemy (malligant) without words and continues to move pushing and fighting through a bunch of people to get to the enemy there is clearly a similar form as i would believe the system intends to work.

thanks!