Search Posts
I'm not familiar with this particular archetype, but for my house rules I'd allow it on a case by case basis. If the character concept the PC is going for necessitates using an archetype that normally be barred from because of RAW, like a racial archetype from the ARG for example*, you can use it. I've even taken it further and included class features, within reason, though none of my players took me up on that. *I have a primary supporting NPC that uses an archetype belonging to another race, but since it contained class features that really didn't feel tied down to that concept, I took it. In fairness, I gave the option to my players should they ever want it, provided I signed off on it.
Extra word in the second paragraph of the section Playing the Game, from the Getting Started chapter of the PRD. Unless otherwise noted, whenever you are must round a number, always round down. This should be like... Unless otherwise noted, whenever you must round a number, always round down.
Just be aware that it's not a system like the Race Builder, and it's most likely more like the Create A Spell chapter of Ultimate Magic! So just to be clear, it's less like the Race Builder and more like Designing Spells section of the Mastering Magic chapter? I'm actually still okay with this either way.
I originally had no desire to pick this book up. That was until I read this part in the description:
Insta-buy. :)
I try to use the fluff as much as possible, but freely deviate when I find cool options that seem bound to a race or class. The mechanics for Dreamweaver Witch, for instance, really appealed to me for a tengu character. Nothing in the description was compelling enough to me that it had to be bound to the changeling, according to RAW.
Hi all, About to run a homebrew Jade Regent game in a few weeks and was curious how Profession skill has worked for your players. Have you found it used? With players basically on the road the whole time, I'm curious how or if certain professions may not be justified, or is the money made per week hand-waived? Obviously, I could see teaching, cooking, fortune-telling, oratory, writing, and stuff that's doable on the road. But what if some one's a logger, smithy, etc?
I really want to see Carrion Crown next in line. That would mean hope for backwards-support for Jade Regent (what I'm running) and beyond. Obviously, they gotta support Wrath of the Righteous and beyond first and foremost, but in 'off season' retro-active releases would be immensely appreciated.
so, I am assuming this box only comes with medium bases? If so do we know how many? The product description does not out-and-out say it includes bases. If this is the case and you never picked up a Bestiary Box, just add a pack of 20 medium bases to your sidecart and you should be set to unleash all four Cutthroat Lawyers on your unsuspecting PC's!
This may of came up already, but I appreciate that the Relationship rules wording have changed in regards to experience. It's not just "you gain" but "your party gains". This works better for my campaign as my players are cool with me giving out the xp will be given out on an even field. But what's great is, you can use the old wording if each person's xp is on it's own track. Yay flexible options! I also appreciate the cool Ulfen artwork in the Honor section.
Printer friendly to me, especially related to roleplaying game PDFs means effectively shutting off a) background textures, b) top, bottom, and edge dressing, and c) photos. Since these are produced in InDesign (unless I'm mistaken), shutting off these layers doesn't necessarily sound that difficult, but it is moderately time consuming to ensure each page displays as correct as possible. I would love something like this, especially to print out sections of AP's.
Is it me, or is this running 8 months late? Ben, read through the last three pages. It's not just you. We've been waiting a long time for this one. To my memory, it's the most delayed product Paizo's ever put out. Printing issues happen, but it'll make the release so much sweeter when it's finally here!
I'd like to know the answer to that question, myself. It's instances like this that I don't like those cards or fumble breaking rules. It just seems too harsh, especially if there happens to be no replacement weapon at your disposal. If I'm running the game, I'll come up with an alternative penalty that may put a damper on the moment (i.e. You lose your grip on the weapon while swinging and it falls to the ground just out of reach). |
