The_Hanged_Man wrote:

sherlock1701 wrote:

Oh, and the minion trait is chock full of logical holes and means that nobody would fear powerful necromancers anymore, since only 3 of their undead could do anything at a time. Gone are the days of skeletal armies for heroes to battle. Just 3 at a time, and they're always slow and oblivious.

You do realize that monsters don’t need to follow the same build rules as PCs right? The rules exist for PCs to facilitate flow and reasonable balance at the table. Sauron the necromancer can still control all of his ringwraiths just fine.

No, that's unreasonable. If the NPC can do it, the PC should be able to just as well, and vice versa. Otherwise it's unfair to one side.

And you may have missed this, but I'm against separate build rules for monsters, so...

Hold on, I'm having trouble keeping up with you!

Cheating!? Are you kidding me! You have to dig a hole, mix the concrete, move the f~&+ers, then let it set!

It's a lot harder than people make it out to be.

Oh, so it's 70/30 now, I wasn't told we're moving over here.

captain yesterday wrote:

Talonhawke wrote:

captain yesterday wrote:

Nefreet gets it, it's done to be that one special person that does it to be special.

There isn't a single religious non evil character concept that can't be realized using the hundreds of already allowed deities.

Could that not be said of allowing new feats/spells/traits/items? Is there really going to be anything new under the sun with the next book to roll out, or will it just be a new possibly more efficient method of something that already exist?

There's stuff not allowed from new books released all the time. :-)

It's nothing new. :-)

But following the deity logic then we could just stop approving new PFS content altogether. You can already make your build no need for anything else.

That's not what I said.

But you know that already. :-)

Oh, hold on guys, we're moving over here now.

Are we moving here as well, good to know. :-)

Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't realize we were moving, my bad!

Why would you need to constantly switch back and forth, it's not politics, you don't have to flip flop, you can pick one and stick with it.

Oh, I'm sorry, are we moving over here now.

Hrothdane wrote:

What does polygamy have to do with same-sex marriage?

Well in the context of a Pathfinder alignment thread about slavery...

Marriage was the other institution that in REAL WORLD history allowed one human to own another. I think almost all the same arguments about slavery being immoral could be applied to olde timey marriage, but somehow marriage transitioned into the 21 century (or is transitioning...), while slavery morphed into exploitative labor practices.

Hold on guys, we're going over here now. I understand, it's hard to keep up.

Oh, the picture of and description of the creature aren't part of the stat block?

Silly me.

==Aelryinth

Oh, I'm sorry are we moving over here now. Silly me!

Is the Feng Shui better over here?

We're set on moving then, huh?

Am.. Am I moving again?

*sigh*

Whatever, let's move over here then.

Hold on guys, I'm over here now, try to keep up.

Hold on guys I'm over here now.