Mike Dalrymple's page

I don't play PFS anymore, all I know is now I want to play PFS core campaign. I don't care how long I have to wait for a table of "core campaign" to open up, it's worth it. My VC keeps a website going to inform the players of what scenarios are being offered and when he offers a core campaign I'll sign up. Also the responsibility of letting the VC (or who ever organizes PFS in your area) know you want "core" lies with the player. Talk to your organizer and let him know what you want. if he doesn't than it's time you started organizing...

Former VC of New Orleans,

Mike D.

The GM says, "I've never had a group make it past the first encounter in this scenario."

I'd look up some Anton LeVey stuff on you tube and see if that inspired you, after all he was the head of the church of satan.

If they stay lifetime, I don't see me ever using any.

I have to totally agree with williamoak, That spell is way too powerful for 15,000gp to even touch.

If a GM bans dice apps because they are a Luddite I take issue with that. If on the other hand though they suspect someone hacking an app they have more serious issues at they're table and banning an app wont fix them.

I agree with Turin, I had no idea what to do with the Realms. If I put something some place they just come out with the coolest world event in that place. I want some empty space to stretch my gm legs in and know it isn't going to have a major over hall that will effect the areas surrounding it and ruin all my work. When you change an area you can change a region and that's a lot of work to redesign.

One of the best melee machines I've ever seen in action was a wild shaping druid.

I have to put my .02 in. While I don't like sex in my campaign, it's going to show up every time a pc flirts with a bar maid or if there is any innuendo (and if you've played for a while innuendo always shows up). With that in mind I run what I know: I'm heterosexual and so are my players so we go in that direction. Having played in a game run by a homosexual friend I have to say I didn't notice anything weird or strange. Homosexuals in a fictional world isn't really that big of a deal. If a game has gratuitous sex, heterosexual or homosexual I'll walk because that isn't what I'm into. But gay undertones like a character flirting with the young apprentice of the black smith isn't going to ruin my game or make me start an inquisition at my table.

On a lighter note when we were a playing Pathfinder society scenario: City of Strangers I & II, Ms. Feathers (a Transgender prostitute) was awesome and a Male Cleric of Calistria had a little off screen evening with him. It didn't cause the earth to become a lake of fire, blood to run out of the sinks or cause to gad flies to invade the shop we were playing in, we just went with it and had a grand old time.

Casting an evil spell is not an alignment infraction in and of itself, as long as it doesn't violate any codes, tenents of faith, or other such issues.

Committing an evil act outside of casting the spell, such as using an evil spell to torture an innocent NPC for information or the like is an alignment infraction. Using infernal healing to heal party members is not an evil act.

I can't possibly define what every evil act could be. That is why I rely on GM discretion. But simply casting an evil descriptor spell is not an evil act in and of itself.

Found this in the PFS section where alignment infractions are under a lot of scrutiny.

Edit for Clarity