![]()
![]()
Spook205 wrote:
Seems silly if you found the mausoleum just knock it down and help him greet the sun. Really it seem like you aren't weaponizing the weaknesses so much as using them to troll a vampire, ![]()
Best wish backfire ever. A rather immature player had his character wish for the ability to become irresistible to women, now this was actually from a wish granting entity... So when ever the player would say the magic word... I can't recall what it was Shazam maybe? Anyway he'd say the command word and "poof" he'd turn into a baby, or a kitten, maybe a teacup pig. ![]()
Starbuck_II wrote:
In 3.0 fast healing ceased functioning if you were below 0 hp. ![]()
Kletus Bob wrote:
Because his class makes him proficient with the repeating crossbow. If he's human he won't be able to take crossbow master until level 7, and that assumes he skips precise shot(not a good idea) and deadly aim. Picking up a repeating crossbow once he can afford one doesn't prevent him from taking crossbow mastery in the future and it doesn't cost him any additional feats so why not. ![]()
Have a really really old version of one of the PC's travel back in time, touch his past self before vanishing. This contact gives the player or perhaps the whole party dreams and or visions of the future.
![]()
Look at the rules for craft, its based on weekly or daily progress does that make any since when preparing a roasted pheasant with whiskey sauce? No it doesn't. Officially cook is a profession skill, its on the list.
![]()
BretI wrote:
I never said it was an invention of 3.5. Mithral was indeed in even earlier editions that however isn't relevant because 3.5 is the edition on which Pathfinder is based. Except for ONE LINE about armor proficiency it's copied and pasted out of the 3.5 SRD. So how it worked in 3.5 "armor proficiency" aside is very relevant because paizo didn't change anything else. ![]()
Look at the actual description of hireling entry and it says the price range is 1gp to 3gp perday. If the table and the entry are in conflict the entry wins.
Also the weekly money making rules from profession and craft skill are intended for PC's and shouldn't be applied to NPC's. Its not intended as a RL simulation but to at least give the skill profession some contribution other then flavor. ![]()
Lets look at the origins, namely 3.5. The entry in mithral in 3.5 SRD is identical to the one today in Pathfinder except for the line about it not counting towards armor proficiency. Like much of the ported rules it was a copy paste job. But like many things in he 3.5 SRD the printed material actually had more information, they gave a barbarian's fast movement as an example of a limitation. Thus a Barbarian wearing mithral full plate could still use his fast movement.
So a class ability was called out as an example of a limitation mithral removed. Specific magic items like elven chainmail and the mithral fullplate of speed called out the armors as being treated as one category lighter. These items were later copied and pasted into pathfinder. The Feycraft armor template couldn't be applied to heavy armor, however it called out the exemption for mithral heavy armor which counted as medium. In 3.5 in every way mithral counted as a armor category lighter. But then Paizo comes along and adds two sentences about it not applying to armor proficiency and suddenly people take that ball and run with it. They called out ONE exemption in the paizo rule book. ONE and that was armor proficiency. Thus mithral is counts as a lighter type of armor in all respects. ![]()
Elementals like all outsiders are are made from the essence of there respective planes. So yes banishment should work on an elemental no matter where it was created unless your on the corresponding elemental plane. Being made from the essence of another plane of existent should exclude the possibility of it being native to anywhere else. Just like having the evil subtype means holy weapons hurt regardless of your actual alignment, ![]()
Taenia wrote:
According to the acrobatics skill by RAW you can you can avoid the AoO from moving [u]through an enemy's square[/u] by making a DC 5 + the opponent's CMD. Moving though an opponents square REQUIRES ENTERING IT. So again I ask how can acrobatics allow you to move through an opponents space without provoking an AoO but suddenly fail when you stop within said space. ![]()
Scavion wrote:
Holding your breath doesn't stop the cloud from touching your skin, or getting into your eyes. The Necklace of Adaptation wraps the wearer in a shell of fresh air not just his head which is why it works on cloudkill which explicitly says
So would holding your breath work on Stinking Cloud maybe? but as the OP points out it only has a 50% chance of stopping an inhaled poison. Furthermore when the mage first casts the spell the effects are immediate so you wouldn't get to hold your breath until your turn. ![]()
Quote: What you need to clarify is "What is special about the first round of combat that doesn't apply to latter rounds, in IC terms?" The answer is there is always surprise, initiative decides who acts first so it also decides whose perception check succeeded first. If the Orc has an initiative of 15 and you have an initiative of 10 then the enemy spotted you first and thus has the advantage that round. Even if you both rounded the corner and bumped into each other. The signal enemy attack reached the brain of one combatant first. ![]()
thorin001 wrote: By RAW there is no way to counter the AOO for entering an occupied square.It is a special trigger that was not listed on the AOO chart, and it is not movement per se. Which is ridiculous because you can move through an occupied square using acrobatics but you can't stop in the occupied square? Where is an AoO listed for staying in an opponents square. ![]()
I think the item would change possession, a returning weapon "flies" through the air back to the creature that threw it, the following round. It doesn't teleport so it'd have to escape #2's grasp. You can take this further what if character #2 catches the weapon and then teleports away? The weapon won't return until just before #1's next turn but how does it do it over that distance and possibly through solid objects. ![]()
Eliminating confirmation rolls also eliminates the drama of seeing a critical threat... will it succeed or fail. A lot can depend on the style of the adventure too. You may find that after removing critical confirmation rolls encounters become a bit more difficult.Chances are the PC's face more critical threats then they dish out. ![]()
For my E6 campaign which has a 1600's era setting. Early firearms are priced at 10%.(advanced do not exist) I also increased the range increment by 50%(scatter shot not effected) However the armor penetration is only six points of armor instead of all. So while guns are much more common they don't completely negate the PC's defenses. Gunslingers also get gun training at level one instead of the gunsmithing feat. ![]()
The Nagi Appearance and Physiology
Society
Standard Racial Traits
Defense Racial Traits
Magical Traits
Senses Racial Traits
Nagi, male
![]()
A walking creature caught in a fireball can still walk fine. Why should a harpies wings burst into flames and prevent her from flying? Its just not how the game works. Severe burns on your legs would preventing someone from walking just as well as burning the feathers of a bird's wings. Is your adventuring group entirely bald because all their hair would burn off every time they were caught in a fireball? If a fireball is going to set a harpies wings on fire its only fair it set a human's head on fire. ![]()
"GreyWolfLord"You also have to remember...the others that wanted to go back...they had expectations of being able to cart out some treasure as well and utilize it for their own measures...if they can...surely the PC's can as well.[/QUOTE wrote:
![]()
Shae'ura-Drae wrote: Find a safe place in the city and use the Jewel of Everlasting Gold to craft a bunch of magic items. Then leave the city with completely customized loot! That doesn't work, gold isn't transmuted into magic items its used to buy raw materials to make the magic items. The city has been in ruins for centuries there are no shops to buy the raw materials from. The city also sits on an island aptly named the Isle of Terror due to the frequent storms of negative energy. ![]()
GreyWolfLord wrote: Or do away with the rule that anything taken from the city returns. That's pretty easy to rule on and explains pretty much why people leave rich. Even loaded down with gold, the players are not going to make much of a dent in what's there. Allowing the players to have a couple million gold at level six is an entirely different problem. The city is literally not figuratively PAVED with gold. Ipslore the Red wrote: So remove that problem if you want them to have loot. Do you plan on using the characters in the future? If he wasn't planning on using the characters in the future it wouldn't matter how much treasure they got. Its the conclusion of a three module adventure path that takes characters from level 1 to level 6. Coalford, I'm currently running this adventure path with my group and they are just inside the third ring. The city being filled with wealth that's completely useless is part of the theme. Its an avarice/Orange Lantern kind of message.
As I recall from the second module in the adventure path the cultists in the temple had a good deal of treasure in both gear, gems and art objects. Some adventures skimp on treasure some are loaded with it. The fact the city of gold skimps on loot just makes it ironic. If you want to add more treasure allow the PC's to find an armory or some vault containing treasure not made of gold so its obviously lootable. Just remember treasure value doesn't have to escalate every adventure. ![]()
Secret Wizard wrote:
Given that its an archtype couldn't it have an ability to load slings faster? Furthermore the alternate racial trait for Halflings "Warslinger" lets them reload slings as a free action. Just two things to consider when designing the archtype. ![]()
UnArcaneElection wrote:
General Dos still burned the entire city to the ground and executed everyone. There is no way to spin that in a good way to please Uno unless that spin is your welcome to Dos's head. He already knows Dos did it to kill any possible rebels in the town doesn't change the fact a beloved family member is dead. What you purpose is the same spin Palpatine tried that when he blew up Alderaan. It didn't stop tens of thousands of Imperial officers from Alderaan from defecting to the rebellion. Your spin also completely ruins the story why bother with the background if the story didn't actually change anything. Instead of an interesting dynamic you have no dynamic. ![]()
Archae wrote: I do like some ideas in it actually, it works well with the idea I am using for the class. Its a class called the Harlequinn made by green smashomancer . Part of the idea where there's some force who gave her the power works nicely , but her being controlled by it is a part I most likely won't be using maybe said power more inspired this plan of hers. Point being it gets me think and if you wanna keep throwing ideas out feel free cause I need inspiration for important characters. Oh you misunderstand its not controlling her its manipulating her. It opens up an avenue of "victory" where they simply prove the jewel is in fact a trap that will destroy her. She'd still have her evil empire and could pursue other avenues to godhood. But here's some ideas for other important characters First you have General Uno, a high ranking commander in the army of the Big Bad. Years ago there was a small town population a couple hundred The town was suspect of harboring rebel solders so another commander General Dos decided to handle the problem by simply burning the town to the ground and killing every last woman and child to set an example for anyone else who'd dare oppose the Big Bad. Unfortunately a family member of General Uno was visiting the town at the time. Now this is where you have a choice... did the Big Bad reward General Dos and thus alienate and anger General Uno due to the death of a beloved family member. Or did she order the execution of General Dos labeling him a traitor simply to ensure the loyalty of General Uno. You can change the names or change the ranks but the basics are the same. One gets to be the PC's perhaps amoral ally the other the enemy. ![]()
I have some ideas for the background for your big bad. Feel free to discard Long ago the the land was wracked with turmoil and civil war. Back then Big Bad wasn't so bad. She was a typical person living a normal life. Until the day her village as destroyed by a warlord and she was the only survivor. As she lay in mostly buried the rubble of her house a voice in the back of her mind offered her power. The power to fight, the power to bring order and stability the land. As her power and influence grew so did her ambitions and the whisper in the back of her mind grew stronger.
And now her final goal is to become a god and turn her empire into a religion with her at the center... but she is deceived. The voice in her head isn't her own inner-self but a God of Tyranny from another world who seeks to gain a strong foot hold in the world. So the Big Bad is in the end a pawn. The jewel will not actually make her a god it will allow the foreign god to enter the world through her. Now here's where things get twisted, you could put a voice in one of the PC's heads that claims to be helpful and at times it does provide them with useful information. This is the same entity that influenced the Big Bad. If the PC's gather all the pieces of the Jewel the voice will insist said player use the jewel to become a god himself in order to end the Big Bad's reign of terror. This has the same end result of the Big Bad using the jewel. However I would presume your players are wise enough NOT to fully trust a mysterious voice in their head. Old journal recovered some some ruined fort belonging to the Big Bad could reveal to the PC's that she has a voice in her head driving her ambitions. ![]()
Bandw2 wrote:
Not actually true Size and Magic Items wrote: When an article of magic clothing or jewelry is discovered, most of the time size shouldn't be an issue. Many magic garments are made to be easily adjustable, or they adjust themselves magically to the wearer. Size should not keep characters of various kinds from using magic items. Its designed that way so the small characters can use the rings, cloaks, boots and other such items when looted from bigger enemies. Or if the party fought an ogre or some other giant enemy the party can actually make use of the loot. ![]()
Ahh yes, Bhaal is back along with Myrkul and much previously Bane. I think its time to kill Cyric, he's pissed of damn near every deity in existence. Several of the gods he killed or was responsible for the demise of have returned to life. I imagine him running through the outer planes being pursued by a horde of angry deities to the tune of "Benny Hill Chase" ![]()
Claxon wrote: As swarms do not make attack rolls, I would agree that they are unaffected by Sanctuary. Irrelevant. No where under the sanctuary spell does it say "attack roll." It simply says they are unable to "attack" the target. A swarm may not make attack rolls but its damage is still from an attack and it falls under the attack line. The word "swarm attack" is repeated numerous times in the swarm intro. If one thousand goblins attacked a PC protected by sanctuary, the spell would be effective against all of them(with lots of saving throws). The purpose of a swarm is to have a huge number of small creatures function like a single creature. So sanctuary should be fully effective against them. ![]()
I suddenly have an image of an Ogre with a goblin strapped to his shield to help protect him from a brilliant energy weapon... at least the first hit. *Lightsabers are beams of plasma suspended within a force containment field. So they are in essence solid objects but radiate intense heat allowing them to easily cut through most any material. ![]()
Snorb wrote:
Dragons, and other creatures with already high attack rolls, the same would be applied to ranged weapons with deadly aim. It'd also make low ac enemies incredibly vulnerable. Then you have true strike stuff. Drink a potion of true strike then charge the next round for a huge damage bonus. ![]()
A doctor presuming a non-divine caster would simply have ranks in heal and perhaps
What do you mean by a skilled trade? I don't think I quite understand the question. Sailor is a skilled trade, Profession(sailor) allows you to steer the ship, adjust the sails etc etc. Except for the ship's cook ev A Doctor would simply have ranks in heal and profession herbalism. ![]()
Machaeus wrote:
DM's can make appraise more useful by having the results effect the sale price. If you appraise the gem at 150gp but its actually worth 200gp you'd happily sell it for the price you think its worth. So if unsuccessful appraise checks cost you upwards of 20% of the profits from the sale of gems, art and other non-magical goods. It'd make the skill more attractive
Search Posts
![]()
![]() It is not a surprise to many of you who know me that I was/am rather disappointed to the somewhat recent changes made to the Crane Wing feat. What I would like to do is take a moment to examine a number of our "block" powers more closely, and evaluate their various mechanics. I intend to list each ability, followed by rating those game mechanics involved with it from one * to five *****. The scale is thus: *- A terrible mechanic that greatly harms the ability to the point where it is either non-functional, or can only be used beneficially in the rarest of circumstances. This can also indicate an ability whose resource investment to acquire vs. effect is horrific. **- While this mechanic functions, it is not neither bad nor good. Likely this mechanic either makes the circumstances needed to employ the ability somewhat uncommon, or it's effect is noticeably less reliable and impressive than other options requiring a similar level of investment. This can also indicate an ability whose resource investment to acquire vs. effect is average. ***- This is a good mechanic. Either the circumstances to employ it to one's benefit is very common, or the effective is a stronger than average one. This can also indicate an ability whose resource investment to acquire vs. effect is efficient. ****- You can almost never go wrong with this mechanic. There are very few circumstances in which it cannot be used, and it's overall effect is incredibly strong in the arena it was designed for. This can also indicate an ability whose resource investment to acquire vs. effect is excellent. *****- This mechanic is among the strongest of options available in the system for the arena it was designed for, and generally strong even outside of that. The circumstances in which it functions almost cannot be denied to you, and the effect is all but guaranteed mathematically to function against appropriate level opponents. This can also indicate an ability whose resource investment to acquire is next to non-existent. Feat: Crane Wing:
Prerequisites: Crane Style, Dodge, Improved Unarmed Strike, base attack bonus +5 or monk level 5th.
Benefit: Once per round, when fighting defensively with at least one hand free, you can designate one melee attack being made against you before the roll is made. You receive a +4 dodge bonus to AC against that attack. If you using the total defense action instead, you can deflect one melee attack that would normally hit you. An attack so deflected deals no damage and has no other effect (instead treat it as a miss). You do not expend an action when using this feat, but you must be aware of the attack and not flat-footed. - 3 feat pre-reqs; **
Feat: Deflect Arrows:
Prerequisites: Dex 13, Improved Unarmed Strike.
Benefit: You must have at least one hand free (holding nothing) to use this feat. Once per round when you would normally be hit with an attack from a ranged weapon, you may deflect it so that you take no damage from it. You must be aware of the attack and not flat-footed. Attempting to deflect a ranged attack doesn't count as an action. Unusually massive ranged weapons (such as boulders or ballista bolts) and ranged attacks generated by natural attacks or spell effects can't be deflected. - 13 in an attribute, 1 feat pre-reqs; ***
Feat: Divine Interference:
Prerequisites: Divine spellcaster, caster level 10th.
Benefit: As an immediate action, when an enemy within 30 feet hits an ally with an attack, you can sacrifice a prepared divine spell or (if you are a spontaneous caster) an unused spell slot and make the enemy re-roll the attack roll. The second attack roll takes a penalty equal to the level of the spell you sacrifice. You must sacrifice a spell of 1st-level or higher to use this ability. Whether or not the second attack is successful, you cannot use this effect on the same creature again for 1 day. - divine spellcaster level 10 pre-reqs; ** (access issues keep this from being higher)
Class Feature: Parry, Duelist 2:
At 2nd level, a duelist learns to parry the attacks of other creatures, causing them to miss. Whenever the duelist takes a full attack action with a light or one-handed piercing weapon, she can elect not to take one of her attacks. At any time before her next turn, she can attempt to parry an attack against her or an adjacent ally as an immediate action. To parry the attack, the duelist makes an attack roll, using the same bonuses as the attack she chose to forego during her previous action. If her attack roll is greater than the roll of the attacking creature, the attack automatically misses. For each size category that the attacking creature is larger than the duelist, the duelist takes a –4 penalty on her attack roll. The duelist also takes a –4 penalty when attempting to parry an attack made against an adjacent ally. The duelist must declare the use of this ability after the attack is announced, but before the roll is made. - 2 levels of prestige class pre-reqs; *** (if you want this ability, even dipping, it's a pretty simple affair)
Class Feature: Opportune Riposte and Parry, Swashbuckler 1; or Feat: Amateur Swashbuckler:
At 1st level, when an opponent makes a melee attack against the swashbuckler, she can spend 1 panache point and expend a use of an attack of opportunity to attempt to parry that attack. The swashbuckler makes an attack roll as if she were making an attack of opportunity; for each size category the attacking creature is larger than the swashbuckler, the swashbuckler takes a –2 penalty on this roll. If her
result is greater than the attacking creature’s result, the creature’s attack automatically misses. The swashbuckler must declare the use of this ability after the creature’s attack is announced, but before its attack roll is made. Upon performing a successful parry and if she has at least 1 panache point, the swashbuckler can as an immediate action make an attack against the creature whose attack she parried, provided that creature is within her reach. - 1 class level or feat pre-reqs; ****
If one were to consider combing this with Combat Reflexes and Signature Deed, I would instead rate it as: - 1 class level and 2 feats or 3 feat pre-reqs; **
As you might see, a number of these abilities prior to Opportune Riposte and Parry have minor advantages and disadvantages in comparison to one another. OR&P by itself is quite strong compared to the others. Once combined with 2 additional feats? Forget about it, the other options are in the dust. At least for myself, I am incredibly curious (as well as frustrated) why Crane Wing was seen as too strong and altered, when the OR&P chain so completely overshadows even the old Crane Wing mechanics. The only difference in the pre-reqs are need for 11th character level for the later combination to really take off. Even prior to that point, however, it remains comparably strong to old Crane Wing. Auto deflect > than opposed attack roll of course, but OR&P + CR negates just about all the problems in employment that old Crane Wing could have faced that would have caused it to fail to launch. What do you think? ![]()
![]() [OOC: This thread is intended to serve as an opportunity for role-play when away from the gaming table. Please feel free to participate or observe as you wish and/or as is appropriate for your PC.] Many Pathfinders have gathered at Absalom's Grand Lodge within the Great Hall of Skyreach on the promise of hearing of a new and daring expedition from one of the Decemvirate's recently appointed Venture-Captains. Several dozen Pathfinders presently occupy the room, engaging in conversation with their peers or otherwise busying themselves with trinkets and study as they await their guest speaker. They are not made to wait long. The fiendish figure that emerges upon the speaker's stage is clearly a tiefling. Though his body is nimble and wiry with corded muscle, he is quite ugly, near completely covered in tattoos, and adorned with scars. A moderate number of ioun stones rest embedded within the flesh of his hands, arms, and forehead. Upon taking the stage, he delays but a moment to sweep his gaze over the crowd before speaking. "Brothers and sisters of The Pathfinder Society, thank you for coming today. I wish to once again give my thanks to Venture-Captain Valsin for allowing me the use of his fine lodge this day. With that, allow me to begin. My name is Venture-Captain Val Morik, and with the Decemvirate's hard won approval for the expedition, I have created a lodge within The Darklands which I have named The Deep Lodge." The Venture-Captain pauses here to allow those gathered who might experience a degree of shock a moment to recover their senses. "The Deep Lodge lies some three and a half thousand feet below Andoran's surface, on The Darklands level known as Sekamina. It is most easily reached via teleportation magic, but a skilled and determined spelunker could employ mundane means to journey there through Andoran's surface...if they knew where to begin such a journey." "I have made great effort to forge a relationship with the nearby Svirfneblin of Sekamina, and their Lord General has allowed us to build The Deep Lodge within their territory near one of their hidden cities on that level." "The purpose of this lodge will be simple to speak, but extremely difficult to carry out. I was born within the lightless depths of this place, and dwelt there for decades before coming to Avistan's surface. It is an incredibly dangerous place fraught with peril and the unknown. We have very little geographical knowledge of The Darklands, and even less knowledge of it's history, magics, and secrets. The Deep Lodge will serve as a local staging ground for expeditions who's purpose is to remedy our lack of intimate knowledge." "My purpose in speaking to you here today is to rally seasoned Pathfinders who are able and willing to serve in these expeditions. Make no mistake - missions within the confines of the dark are to be considered extremely dangerous, and under no circumstances can we expose novice Pathfinders to such dangers. The Deep Lodge requires skilled arcanists to erect magical defenses for the lodge. Faithful clergy to fortify us against any malign influences that may encroach. Expert trackers and wilderness guides to lead expeditions through the dark without losing their bearing. Adept linguists and diplomats to assist the lodge in keeping it's relationship with the svirfneblin strong and negotiating our presence with other species we may encounter not immediately bent on our demise. Finally, hardy rough and tumble warriors capable of protecting our explorers from the inevitable conflicts they will face." The confident tiefling pauses once again to allow that which he has spoken to be processed. "At this time I will field what questions I can so that those among you who might be interested in joining The Deep Lodge are capable of making the most informed decision you can." ![]()
![]() My core group is going to be off and on partial hiatus for the foreseeable future, and myself and one of the other members are considering play options for those off weekends that will not impact our plans with our group. What came to mind was a play through of Eyes of the Ten. I have ran this story arc, and he has played it - thus giving us an excellent opportunity to experience the other side together in play. If anyone in the general Columbus Ohio area would be interested in a play through, drop us a line here, and if there is enough interest we will see about setting up a table, location, and some dates. ![]()
![]() For those who may need a rules refresh, the rules for counterspelling can be found here: Counterspelling I am going to highlight two important sentences that appear in those rules here: 1). To use a counterspell, you must select an opponent as the target of the counterspell. 2). To complete the action, you must then cast an appropriate spell. For further reference, a note on using dispel magic to counterspell (taken from the spell's description): "Counterspell: When dispel magic is used in this way, the spell targets a spellcaster and is cast as a counterspell. Unlike a true counterspell, however, dispel magic may not work; you must make a dispel check to counter the other spellcaster's spell." So here comes the question. By my reading of this, it appears there are numerous effects that would counter a counterspell. Example: Wizard A has spell turning in effect. He casts disintegrate at Wizard B. Wizard B uses his readied action to counterspell, but because he has to target Wizard A and cast his own disintegrate or targeted dispel magic to do so, spell turning counters the counterspell and reflects it back upon Wizard B (reflects the spell used, not the counterspell effect)? Another example: Wizard A has a ring of counterspells (storing magic missile). Wizard A then casts magic missile at Wizard B, who uses his readied action to counter it with his own magic missile. Because Wizard B must target Wizard A and cast magic missile to counterspell, the ring of counters will counter his casting of magic missile and fizzle the spell so that his attempt to counterspell likewise fizzles? Do others share this same understanding as it is written? ![]()
![]() I think I have this down, I just want to confirm in the event I am mistaken somewhere. Here is the situation: Our 16th level group has 2 lantern lodge characters who both want credit for the Way of the Kirin. Alas, we have no characters below 15th level at the moment. So in order for us to both get credit, this process should work if I am correct. 1). I run the scenario for the other 4 players, who all play 7th level pregens. Those players will hold that chronicle sheet until they get a PC to 7th level, then immediately apply it. 2). The other LL player runs the scenerio myself and the other 3, again all playing pre-gens. I will gain a chronicle sheet as a player to use as above, and though the other players will count as a legal table for our GM's credit, they will not gain another chronicle sheet. That is all correct, yes? ![]()
![]() I have noticed that in some PFS legal adventure paths and modules, captured enemy spellbooks sometimes contain unspecified or random elements. Example: Shattered Star Adventure Path, Beyond the Doomsday Door:
In area D5, when Zolerim is defeated his spellbook is easily located. It contains, and I quote, "all his prepared wizard spells plus 2d4 other spells from level 1st to 5th of your choice." In cases such as this, what is the legal PFS response to determining what these unspecified spells are? We just ran this last night and my wizard is dying to know if these extras are salvageable in any capacity. ![]()
![]() I'm curious if there has been an official word, errata, clarification, ect. on how this item interacts with multiple sorcerer-bsed bloodlines. Strictly RAW, it appears as though the robe would increase all bloodlines and eldritch heritages by +4. Has this been corrected in any way, or any wording discovered in this combination that voids any portion of it? Simple example: let's say we have a cross-blooded (abyssal and infernal) sorcerer 8. This sorcerer also happens to have eldritch heritage (celestial). When the robe is donned, would his effect levels not then be: abyssal 12th
In the case of the eldritch heritage, by my reading, it would not grant him any additional bloodline powers, but would count them as 4 levels higher. Does this seem to be the case to others as well? ![]()
![]() I would be grateful if anyone could tell me what the highest level of play tier is for this scenario. Our home group is flying along pretty quickly, and I want to make sure we halt our progression on our main characters before we exceed the ability to play it. We are really hoping it will get ran at either GenCon or Origins this year so we get an opportunity to play it! ![]()
![]() From the Pathfinder Society Field Guide and the Seeker of Secrets books, there are a number of options for wayfinders, ioun stones, and vanities. I was hoping to get some help in determining which of these options are legal for PFS play. 1). Is implanting ioun stones (detailed in Seeker of Secrets) legal for play? If so, is this process handled as described? How many attempts can a PC make between modules/scenarios/levels? 2). In the same book, it mentions that ioun stones stored in wayfinders can gain additional traits, detailing two methods for doing so. Are either of these methods legal for play? If method 2 is legal, is that something that can simply be noted on the appropriate chronicle sheet with a GM signature? 3). In the Field Guide, there are many really cool vanities listed that are purchasable with prestige points. Are any/all of these legal for play? Thank you all so much for the insight! ![]()
![]() For example, if during a scenario the group recovers 2 potions of cure moderate wounds and uses them during play, does this action subtract gold from their award at the end? I am under the impression using consumables does not impact the final gold, but the question came up last saturday and we just wanted to be sure. Thanks in advance! ![]()
![]() Simply asked, can magical armor enhancements be placed on any items other than "proper" armor, shields, and bracers of armor in PFS? Specifically, could a chest slot item (shirt, tunic, ect.) be enchanted in such a way? Our table was pondering this over last night, and I couldn't find anywhere where it specifically allows for such an enchantment to be performed in a standardized example or plainly spelled out ruling, which I know is required for PFS play since customizing items is not allowed here. On a related but different note, can anything think of a clever way of gaining resistance/immunity to precision damage other than class features or the fortification armor enhancement? Even temporary applications from 1 shot items or spells would be sufficient. Thanks for the assist in advance! ![]()
![]() Hey folks, I have a question regarding having proper paperwork handy for GM credit. When you GM a scenario or module and apply that credit to a character, is the GM session sheet which denotes what character you applied the credit too sufficient alone, or should you also apply and keep the appropriate chronicle sheet along with the session sheet? If the later, how should one note that they received credit for the chronicle sheet via GM credit? Would it be legit enough to simply note it at the bottom where the GM information goes? Thanks in advance for the clarifications! |