Leeroy Jethro Bodine's page

Ravingdork wrote:

SuperBidi wrote:

Unfortunately, it's not the rule, as this sentence says: "For instance, lobbing a fireball into a crowd would be a hostile action, but opening a door and accidentally freeing a horrible monster would not be."

The word accidentally is not accidental. If you open a door and free a horrible monster on purpose it's a hostile action. If you help someone making a hostile action then you are performing a hostile action. You can't Aid on someone's Strike without becoming visible.

That line is so fuzzy, it's not even recognizable as a line. Rulings would be highly inconsistent, at best, and unenforceable at worst.

A rule needs to be clear to be an effective rule. That is not.

In my opinion, the reason why people are annoyed by this rule is that in the past you could use Invisibility during combat and still participate. Hence this discussion: People are searching for what they can do during a combat without taking hostile actions. It's ridiculous. Maybe the whole point of this rule is: You can't stay invisible during a combat if you participate, period. Combats are based on hostility. So all of your combat actions (unless they are aimed at stopping or escaping the fight) will directly or indirectly harm someone.

Easy to apply, and you don't have to wonder if healing the Fighter is an indirect hostile action.

But wouldn't not getting in combat cause harm to indirectly come to someone else since your not an availble target? So by staying invisible someone else got hurt and therefore your (in)actions caused indirect harm.

42

Hands? Or number of actions to put away everything in hand, draw everything needed for battle medicine, and then swap back?

RAWmonger wrote:

I assumed Stunning Fist functions as an Ex ability for the most part, even though it doesn’t say it’s one. If it is that would make it a non-action, not a free action. And yes there’s a difference

Stealth doesnt say what kind of action it is, instead it is often called out as being part of other actions.

stunning fist calls itself out as useable as part of an attack roll, this does not make it a free action... or restrict in any way the free action is.

the only restriction for stunning fist, aside from per round and per day use restrictions, as it says, is it must be declared part of an attack roll.

thusly, it is only usable during an attack roll.

Also, I disagree with derklord but that would be an off topic discussion.

I'm not even sure if your agreeing or disagreeing that it can be used with an AoO at all after reading this.

Well the g and the h are right there next to each other, so I reckon when he died he fell over and his nose landed just right hit G twice the H 3 times before the muscle spasms in his hand clicked the mouse and sent the message.

And if it is common sense to assume your players should have access to Uncommon circus weapons in a circus AP, why not say so explicitly and eliminate the doubt?

I mean sure it's a circus AP but I mean the party's circus is new and doesn't have a juggeler so they don have "access" to that. And since they are new they probably don't have access to the uncommon weapons either since they don't have a lot of money. And for that matter since they are in a circus we probably shouldn't let them use racial uncommon weapons either I mean where are they getting those.

Pathfinder physics are wonkier than that one guys chocolate factory.

WHY IS THIS THREAD NEARLY 650 POSTS.

650 is actually pretty low if you look at some of the longer threads out there.

Out of curiosity, why are we still arguing about this? We know it is a grey area. Until a campaign clarification comes out, GMs can rule on this for themselves. Since we’re clearly not going to settle on an answer, why are we still here?

Okay, that was my existential moment.

Now I am off to shovel my walk, since that is an activity in which I will be able to see real progress today.

Hmm

We now are not having an argument over if it works or not but instead it has become if PFS has the authority to rule on it and if they should.

Wait it just hit me what if the Oozemorph is bad early on because it was supposed to be an archetype for PFS use for all the players with "Lvl 5 Nameless GM blob #17" in their character roster?

Oh damn, it had to be something serious if we're talking Blasphemy.

Plagiarism?

1) They can be used to enhance Unarmed Strikes and nothing more. So they deal 1d3 because that is what human non-monk Unarmed Strike deals. If your Unarmed Strike deal more than 1d3, you deal that using the Gauntlet.

Bean Curd doesn't abide by the laws of nature.

Would that make you killer Tofu?

Well that's all fine and dandy but the limes keep squishing when i try to fit them through in the coconut!

Grate minds think about Cheese and occasionally potatoes, or even better cheese covered potatoes.

I personally like to add a bit of grannies cough medicine to it.

Rednal wrote:

"If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics." -Richard Fenyman

I think I don't understand quantum mechanics. Does that mean I do understand quantum mechanics?

Does anyone really understand quantum mechanics? I mean I've never even driven a Quantum let alone see a mechanic for one.

Working now so clearly it didn't hurt either.

I've got hand tools and a sixth grade edjumaction, CAN WE FIX IT?

Not on your life who wants a some whisky?

Yet another one that crossed my mind I may want to use at some point.