Elfteiroh wrote:
So what are we losing? There has to be some stuff that was cut.
LotsOfLore wrote: I will wait for the errata updated pdfs then. I don't find it attractive to be offered a product that is supposed to be a fix and an upgrade of an existing one, but that itself comes out with a slew of new and important errors on day one... Then you are going to wait forever, because there is always stuff to be fixed.
Berselius wrote:
Yes. We've known this for months. D&D (OGL) classics like Otyugh and Owlbear will be replaced with new monsters unique to Pathfinder. Doesn't mean you can't use the good old owlbear from the Beastiary 1, but it is not going to be used in the future in Paizo products.
Aaron Shanks wrote:
Sadly I am not a subscriber anymore :( And hey, I've never broken the rules in the past! Tho I did the day 1 AMA for some rulebook, don't remember which.
magnuskn wrote:
I am paraphrasing James Jacobs. He publicly stated it in these forums not very long time ago. No reason to not believe him. Also money was and is the greatest argument for most businesses anyway. Even without James' statement, one can reach a conclusion that the shift from 6 to 3 parters is just more economically viable for Paizo.
|