Davelozzi's page

So it looks like there is a product page up for a Starfinder Alien Core Token Box coming in January, though the forum thread there does not seem to be open for comments. Was there any announcement or discussion about this box here or is this a silent announcement of sorts?

It's a bit of a bummer that they are tokens rather than stand-up pawns like Pathfinder. I know that there were SF tokens in Murder in Metal City but was hoping it was a one time thing to make that particular set cost effective, but this seems to suggest tokens will be the new standard for Starfinder.

On the other hand, I realize that they had to sunset the SF1e pawns line a few years back, so it's not too surprising that they are not reopening it for 2nd edition, and on that note I guess it is good news at least we're getting something physical here for those of us planning to play SF2 on an actual (non-virtual) tabletop.

I mentioned this in the thread about pawn art but for anyone not following that thread, this seems like news on its own account...

NPC Core Battle Cards are confirmed in the new Paizo 2025 Catalog that just arrived in my latest subscription shipment, for a September 2025 release.

ISBN PZO10011-MC
978-1-64078-707-0
$54.99

I just received my PDF of the new Monster Core Battle Cards, and while the cards look good and I am excited to have the updated stats, I was disappointed to see that rather than have the pages alternate the front and the back of each card in order like the PDF of the Besiary Batttle Cards do, it’s just a whole bunch of front sides, followed by a whole chunk of back sides, then rinse and repeat for the next chunk of the alphabet. It’s not very user friendly. Any chance of updating the file so they’re in order?

One of my players is considering a fetchling character in my upcoming campaign, which I plan to set somewhere in the southeastern Five King Mountains Andoran/Galt/Taldor border regions. I was trying to figure out how fetchlings might fit in there and notice that Lost Omens: Ancestry Guide has a few paragraphs on the Rikmirit fetchlings in that exact area that apparently were drawn there from the Shadow Plane by an ancient “Surgeon’s Spire”…but there’s not much beyond that at all. It seems like the kind of detail that is bound to be based on something, but I can not find any others reference to these Rikmirit fetchlings in any other sources or on the wiki.

Does this ring a bell with any who might where I can dig in any deeper on this lore?

I'm GMing a SF campaign and one of my players is a solarian. I am planning on showing him the Enhanced Solarian from Starfinder Enhanced at tomorrow night's session, but I am a little confused about the new Attunement Surge ability.

While you have 2 attunement points in a stellar mode, you can expend 2 attunement points on your turn without spending an action to gain two effects until the beginning of your next turn. First, you gain benefits from that mode's stellar revelations as though you were fully attuned, rather than attuned...

Does this mean that a solarian using the enhanced rules now only needs 2 points to use Black Hole or Supernova now, instead of 3? What about other (full-fledged) zenith revelations?

Or is it not giving early access to use these zenith and zenith-lite revelations at 2 attunement points, but simply saying that when you use your other (non-zenith) revelations with Attunement Surge, you gain the extra perk that being fully attuned grants you with those revelations, such as the higher DR with Dark Matter or the doubled Athletics bonus on Gravity Boost?

I just want to be clear before my player asks me.

This AP is off to a great start, it looks very promising indeed. @Sen H.H.S., way to storm onto the AP scene! and @James, we're psyched to have you back in the saddle as developer!

Another question regarding the Guldrege section in Chapter 2 of Mantle of Gold…

I’m reading through the Guldrege section in Chapter 2 of Mantle of Gold, and I am having a lot of trouble making sense out of the maps. I feel like the location numbers are all wrong. Is it just me? I feel like it makes a little more sense if you assume that the F & G tags are reversed (such that the map labeled “Lower Guldrege” with all of the G#s is actually the workshop areas labeled F#s in the text, and vice versa), but even so things still seem to be off so that it’s not a one to one correspondence. For example, the silos are described in the text as F2 & F3, but the buildings that look like silos on the map are labeled G3 & G4. Has anyone else been able to make sense of things? If any of the developers see this post, any chance that we could get some clarity please?

Are there any rules for adding upgrade slots to armor? Or if not, does anyone know if there is a guideline to the value of an upgrade slot when designing new armor types?

A few more specifics, with some Dead Suns spoilers...

I'd love let them supplement by using crafting to upgrade the gear they find, but wasn't sure if there were pitfalls that I might not forsee to letting them add upgrade slots to these armors, or how to balance the value of said slots against other published armors of similar item levels.

This thread is about the penultimate encounter in "Menace Under Otari", the starter adventure in the Beginner Box Game Master's Guide (2e)...if you're planning on playing that adventure, consider yourselves warned that there are spoilers ahead and don't read on.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I am running this adventure for my son and my nephew. In our session this weekend, they got to to Boss Zolgran (the kobold leader) and engaged in a battle with her and her two guards (kobold scouts), plus one surviving kobold warrior that fled there from the prior room.

My son is playing a fighter (named Dot) and bravely fought them to the best of his ability, shoving one of the kobold scouts into the pit, but eventually getting knocked out by the other. My nephew, playing Merisiel (pregen rogue) was more timid and stayed back most of the battle. At the end of the session, Dot was unconscious and was hanging on death's door but was eventually stabilized by some first aid from Merisiel. The boys grandparents showed up at this dramatic moment to pick up my nephew, so we paused as a cliffhanger.

I'm thinking ahead to next session, and have confirmed with my nephew that he plans to have Merisiel attempt to drag Dot to safety when we pick up next time. That said, it will be very difficult for him to pull this off without assistance. Depending on availability of my other son and/or a couple of their friends, there is the possibility of timely reinforcements showing up to save the day.

Barring that though, I am debating ideas on how to handle. Dot is my son's first character that he actually put effort of his own into creating, and this is our first PF2 game (and the first RPG of any sort for my nephew), so I am hoping to avoid a TPK, so I was thinking about the kobolds capturing them instead of fighting to the death. I am looking for any suggestions on why Zolgran might want captives, and what she might do with them, and how I can leave enough bread crumbs for them to reasonably pull off a breakout, and was just curious if anyone had any good ideas to throw at me?

If it matters, the boys are both 11 in real life, Merisiel, Zolgran, and one of the kobold scouts are uninjured, the other two kobolds are at half health. Zolgran is up on the ledge by her throne, the injured scout is in the pit, the other scout is near the unconscious hero, and the surviving kobold warrior is at the foot of the stairs. Zolgran has used one of her Magic Missiles but has two remaining, and has used Ghost Sound to create a roar from the next room in the hopes of making them think that the dragon is coming (though it's not...yet).

Thanks!

I was just wondering if anyone has any experience using the Stamina variant from the Gamemastery Guide (p. 200-201) in their Pathfinder 2e games? I've used in Starfinder (where it is the default assumption), and I like it, but I am always a little wary of using major variant systems in rulesets that aren't specifically designed for them. Has anyone seen it in (PF2) play? Are there any notable pitfalls or anything I should think about before adoptiong, other than whatever is already discussed in the spread in the GMG?

Hi all,
I am about to start my first Starfinder campaign (as GM), and I’m very excited about it, however I was wondering what people’s experiences have been with tracking ammo, battery charges, etc.? In D&D/PF, I’ve usually operated on the policy that as long as the PCs acquire a week to ten days of rations and a couple quivers of arrow/bolts, we can just forego the hassle of tracking unless I am running an adventure that is specifically about limited resources and survival. However, reading the SF CRB, tracking resources seems like a bigger part of the game. Do you all generally track this stuff or handwave it? Is it important for game balance? Thanks!

I am about to start a new Starfinder (Dead Suns) campaign and already have several sets of pawns (CRB, AA1, DSAP, Beginner Box) but at the moment I've yet to poke them out of the cardboard so they are all still neatly stacked in their original packages. I'm curious what folks have found to be a good way to organize their pawns that are actually in use to allow you to find what you need when you need it? Also, hopefully something reasonably portable in case we play at different locations.

Regarding the requirements for the prestige class in PF#27, one if that the character must be proficient with all martial weapons. Yet, in the listings of the various orders, some of the NPCs are listed that would not seem to fit the requirement.

Examples:

Is there some ways these three could qualify for the class that I am missing or is this just an oversight?

Since our Cheliax fix is done now, I'm sure we won't see it anytime soon, but it would be cool if there was another variant PrC or two, namely Hellknight Signifier, which could replace the Hellknight levels for these NPCs.

The other issue is minor...in the article in PF#28, the history laid out make it clear that the Order of the Scourge is the first Hellknight order established, though previous products (the Pathfinder Chronicles Campaign Setting & the Council of Thieves Players' Guide) attribute this honor to the Order of the Rack. I assume that PF#28, bring the newer and more detailed treatment of the subject is correct. If any Paizo folks are reading, it might be something worth noting down to be corrected for the revised campaign setting when it comes out later this year (the reference appears in the timeline under the year 4576, on page 203).

Otherwise, great articles...excellent flavor.

Fake Healer's post (fourth one down) in this thread reminded me that I had been meaning to start a thread about poisonous animals.

Though I also found it convenient to have pre-statted zombies and other creatures of various sizes, I can handle having to advance them myselves without too much problem.

However, for the poisonous creatures that typically are encountered in a wide range of sizes (i.e. centipedes, scorpions, snakes, spiders, and probably some more that I forgot), I found that the little cheat sheet advancement chart in the monster's entry is insufficient because it doesn't address the creatures' signature ability...it's poison. It would be very helpful to have some better guidelines about these guys. The DCs I guess can be calculated closely enough using the monster creation guidelines, but it's not clear to me on if the poison damage is supposed to change, and if so, by how much, as you advance the creature.

I think the Bestiary is great, but to me, this seemed like the most glaring omission.

I would like to suggest that in the product downloads, for the "one file per chapter" version of your products, that the names of the individual files within the zipped folder be clearer. A chapter title would be much more useful than a page range. For example, with the Bestiary, "Pages 54-69" is not a useful indicator of what part of the book I'm dealing with, whereas were the same file called "Dark Stalker - Demon, Vrock" I'd know right away whether or not it was what I was looking for.

For another example, compare the page only file names for the chapters in "Book of the Damned, Vol. 1: Princes of Darkness" to the file names on the various volumes of the Pathfinder Adventure Paths. The latter is far more useful than the former.

Generally I prefer the chapter by chapter downloads for the more manageable file size, but often times I end up downloading and then realizing what a hassle it would be to use (Bestiary again being a great example) and then wasting time (and bandwidth) downloading the product again as a single file.

Thanks for reading.

One of my the PCs in my game wields an urumi (PF Campaign Setting, p. 209-211). For those not in the know, this is a bladed whip, or a flexible sword, much like the weapon wielded by the girl in the Soul Caliber game.

Anyhow, the player is arguing that when he makes a trip attack, he should be doing weapon damage, point out that the rules (PF Beta, p.151) state "you can attempt to trip an opponent as part of a melee attack. Though I agree that logically, a creature being tripped by the weapon would be taking damage, I'm not sure that the above reference to melee attack really implies damage. Furthermore, I feel that if a trip attack can do damage, it's unbalanced as why wouldn't the urumi-wielder anyone not use the trip attack every time.

What do other people think?

I'll use spoiler tags in this post just in case but I suspect that the thread will have enough spoilers later on that we won't need to keep using them...just don't read on if you're playing in a Rise of the Runelords campaign (especially my players).

It's a pretty long post, but if you're of limited attention span, you can skip the details...the important thing is that Nualia has escaped and I'm trying to decide what happens next.

For those who want the details, here is how we got there...

...made you look!

Ok, in the unlikely event that any of my players are reading this, please stop now.

I just started running Runelords, and two of the characters in my group are gnomes from Whistledown. In fact they are brothers, Twiddlemitt Jumberdolt Roselduggin and Nimbledorf Blumpkin Roselduggin. The Roselduggins, like many gnomish familes, have a strong tradition of fey influenced sorcery, and Twiddlemitt is no exception. Unfortunately, his younger brother Nimbledorf was born without the spark and had to turn to the study of wizardry (shudder) to master the arcane. The two brothers have an ongoing rivalry on which form of arcane power is better.

Even though in general I plan on sticking fairly close to the AP as written, given the interesting interlocking background of these two characters, I was thinking that a short side-trek highlighting gnomish culture might be an interesting diversion at some point in the campaign, most likely

I don't want to waste a lot of time on this tangent, but I am thinking that one or two sessions along these lines would be a fun way to reward this unusual character backgrounds.

any thoughts?

My players gave the following feedback about the new rules.

CMB - by the end of the campaign, everyone agreed that the CMB rules were an improvement over the old maneuver rules. The monk player had been reluctant when we first adopted them, but seemed to come around. The monk ability to use full BAB for CMB calcs may have helped here.

Cleric - the player of the cleric was fully behind all the changes to this class, most notably the Channeling rules that replaced Turn Undead, which everyone else was equally happy about. Flavor wise, I wasn't a fan of the Selective Channeling feat he took, but it certainly worked well for the party, especially considering that our necromancer routinely had undead allies fighting with us.

Barbarian - the player of the barbarian was reluctant to convert (more to avoid the hassle than anything else, I believe), but once I lost his character sheet (an accident, I swear) and the issue was forced, he definitely appreciated the new rage powers. We used rage points as written in the Beta, as it was not until just before the last session that I was aware of the variant/update that Jason posted here on the boards. I will be happy to try it without the points (which I feel were a book-keeping annoyance and would be doubly so for NPC barbarians) however I did like the rage powers, minus one or two which I disliked for flavor reasons.

XP - the new XP tables (fast progression) worked well enough for us. It was easy to use and I appreciated being able to calculate the standard way for the whole party or assign the individual awards directly by PC without changing the amounts (seeing as it was a 4 PC party). I generally used the standard method but sometimes used the quick method if we wanted to apply XP mid-session. In past campaigns we have generally waited until the party was in a safe zone before applying level raises, but because this sort of conflicted with the time sensitive nature of this campaign, towards the end I allowed a few video-game style instant level raises. However, the party ended the campaign mid-11th level, so they did get a bit ahead of the recommend leveling rate in the adventure (the intro states that they should have achieved 10th level before the final encounters).

No other aspect of the rules loomed large enough that anyone had any comments worth sharing that I can recall.

Has anyone started a thread (or some other location) to track various easter eggs or other connections between the various Pathfinder APs and Pathfinder/GameMastery modules?

For example, I thought that there was someone in Sandpoint that had a sibling in Korvosa, but I haven't been able to find the connection flipping through the old issues.

Also, there was the connection...

So, what else have we seen in the way of connections?

In the secrets section of Guide to Korvosa it states

However, in the Thassilon article in Pathfinder # 1 (Burnt Offerings), it states that modern site of Korvosa was

So I'm curious if anyone has noticed this discrepancy, assuming that it is one. Anyone from Paizo care to comment on whether or not this was a ret-con or if the situation is just unclear because of the limited info that has been released on this era so far?

I just wanted to throw out there that I would love to see the spells assigned to their schools in a way that makes sense for the school's themes. In my opinion, this was the way that 3.0 and prior editions handled it, but in the 3.5 revision there was what I consider to be a misguided attempt to reclassify spells into different schools to balance the schools.

A good example of this is the orb spells from the splatbooks. In Tome & Blood (3.0), Acid Orb was an evocation spell. In Complete Arcane (3.5), it was recast as a conjuration spell. If the primary effect of a spell is to create and deliver energy damage, that spell should be an evocation spell. Trying to balance the schools is probably futile, but if it is necessary, I suggest that a better way to do it is to add new spells that fit the theme of their school. After all, if I play a conjurer, I'm looking to have a wizard whose primary schtick is summoning creatures to do his bidding. If I'm looking for straight up damage, it's evoker all the way. This mixing and matching blurs the lines between the schools and works against the flavor of having specialists at all.

Ok, Alpha release 1 is 65 page, Pathfinder Beta currently listed as 300+ pages, while the final hardcover rulebook is projected to be 420 pages. With a page count hovering in the middle like that, I was curious, do you expect the Beta release to be a self-contained rulebook, or will it be more like the Alpha, in which you still use the D&D core books, substituting Pathfinder rules where applicable?

As the subject indicates, I'm a little confused about the various shipping options.

I've been an early adopter of both Pathfinder and GameMastery subscriptions. Originally I had selected the option to have my GM modules held to ship with Pathfinder. At some point in the fall, due to some delay in the printing schedule, I had a few items ship that shipped separately.

At that point, the "hold items for one monthly shipment" option appeared so I switched to that. However I still find things are shipping out separately. I received GM module Crucible of Chaos sometime last week and then Pathfinder Vol. 7 this weekend.

Why aren't things shipping once a month? I'm not clear on whether or not I should switch back to the first option. My top priority is not to waste money on multiple shipping charges, though given the choice I would rather have Pathfinder given priority over GM modules. So in an ideal world, there would be one monthly shipment, and it would happen whenever the new Pathfinder was ready.

Finally, I will probably purchase quite a few of the Pathfinders Chronicles line but maybe not every one, and considering the price differences between various items in the line, I would prefer not to subscribe and have everything shipped right away. Is it possible to hold non-subscription items held to ship when the next subscription item ships? Presently the added cost of shipping items separately is holding me up from placing orders, and unfortunately, I have yet to see any of the Chronicles line appear in local game stores.

I hope I'm not coming off as too demanding here, it just seems like these subscriptions options aren't working as smoothly as they could.

I noticed that D0: Hollow's Last Hope was released as OGL compatible but without the d20 logo. As far as I can tell from the press announcements, it looks like this will be the case for the other modules and Pathfinder too. It doesn't bother me at all, but just out of curiosity, why not use the logo for these? I can't see what the advantage is that offsets the presumed sales hit you'd take by not having the logo.

Anyhow, just curious.

I noticed in Eric Boyd's conversion notes for "A Gathering of Winds" (online supplment for issue # 129), the opening line states that "conversion notes for Mintarn (Alhaster and Redhand)...have already been mentioned in conversion sidebars for earlier adventures".

In the "Age of Worms Overload" download, Starmantle is identified as the Realms equivalent to Alhaster. Was this switched to Mintarn at some later point that I missed, or is this reference I mentioned above the first we've heard of it?

I kind of prefer Mintarn, since Starmantle is so far removed from Daggerford/Diamond Lake and Waterdeep/the Free City. What do other folks think?

First off, I haven't read the whole AP yet. I started with "Thirteen Cages" and "Strike on Shatterhorn" and then went back to the beginning and read "Life's Bazaar", "Floor Season", and "Zenith Trajectory", and have just started on "The Demonskar Legacy."

As the thread title indicates, my question relates to the end of "Zenith Trajectory". Spolers below...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Okay, so Celeste and the dwarfleganger hire the party to rescue Zenith Splintershield, but he isn't really captured, he's gone bad. That's fine. The encounter with Zenith seems to assume that the PCs end up fighting him (which they most likely would do). Yet the wrap-up talks of rewards for the rescue and does not mention the possibility that Zenith might be dead.

So what do you think? Does it matter if he's killed? How would that effect the reward?

Is whether or not he dies relevant at all further into the campaign? I'm guessing not because I think I might have read something in one of the later modules that implied that as long as the Cagewrights had the Shackleborn, it didn't matter if they were dead or alive? Is that right?

Either way, it seems odd that Celeste would reward the PCs for a rescue when in fact they've killed the person that they were supposed to rescue and just dragged back his corpse. For that matter, even assuming that they haul his body back seems like a stretch. I bet my players would just kill him and then return and explain what happened, possibly relying on Zone of Truth or other spells to verify their story if necessary.

To me this seems like the first major point where things could break down in this campaign. Does anyone have any thoughts or experiences to share?