Markov Spiked Chain |
I thought the rule was that you couldn't apply it to any character that was in the appropriate level range when you played.
So you wouldn't be able to play a 7th level pregen and apply the 5-9 sheet to your 6th level character. But you could downgrade it and apply it to a level 1, or apply it towards the future of a current level 3.
Deighton Thrane |
Legio has it right. You can use the pre-gen. You can't apply credit from a game played as a pre-gen to a character of the same level or higher, but as long as you're a lower level character, you can use the pre-gen. Then like Legio mentioned, you don't apply credit immediately (even if you're in the same sub-tier), but save the credit until the character you're applying it to has reached the level the pre-gen was played at.
Auke Teeninga Regional Venture-Coordinator, Baltic |
Sniggevert |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
You cannot apply it to the character that can play in that scenario.
Yes, yes you can. The actual rule that's been in the last couple of guides has been explained above. If they wish to remove the possibility of such an option, it would be an easy change of language (as they have (or at least had) such language for module play), but they haven't.
Auke Teeninga Regional Venture-Coordinator, Baltic |
Andrew Christian wrote:You cannot apply it to the character that can play in that scenario.Yes, yes you can. The actual rule that's been in the last couple of guides has been explained above. If they wish to remove the possibility of such an option, it would be an easy change of language (as they have (or at least had) such language for module play), but they haven't.
Could you please make a suggestion for this easy change?
BigNorseWolf |
Yes, yes you can. The actual rule that's been in the last couple of guides has been explained above. If they wish to remove the possibility of such an option, it would be an easy change of language (as they have (or at least had) such language for module play), but they haven't.
guide says one thing board post says something a little different.
MisterSlanky |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |
Also makes a lot of sense if the group is playing the higher tier. You might not want to slow the group down with a 6th level, and a 7th level pre-gen might be a better fit.
In my day, when I was a Venture Officer, words of this nature would have never left my lips.
I show up to game days to play my character. Suggesting that somebody not play their character (and I quote here), "to slow the group down with a 6th level" blows my mind. About five years ago, at Gen Con, we forever lost a player, a good friend of mine in fact, because nearly these exact words left the mouth of the players at his very first Pathfinder table at a convention. He showed up with his Level 2 druid, sat down with a table of 4 & 5's, and was promptly told that he would hurt their group too much and he should play Kyra. He got up, left, and never came back to the game.
Now...the original poster asked if he could play the low level pregen because he felt overpowered, which is fine, if a player has made a decision on his or her own, they do whatever you want, but I'd strongly, strongly consider words more carefully in the manner that you may "slow down" a group of higher level players.
Baronjett |
A new player with his first 5 th character for example sitting down to play a 8-9 tier game should at least be warned that things could get deadly fast. I've seen GM at conventions say " play what you want" with no color and then see the game end 2 hours in due to a near tpk. My thoughts are to guide the group, perhaps with a subtle hint about difficulty and then let the cards fall as they may. As another side note, I want all players to feel engaged , playing up many times means that character takes a minor role and at the end of the night still feels slighted even if the group is sucessful .
Sniggevert |
Sniggevert wrote:Could you please make a suggestion for this easy change?Andrew Christian wrote:You cannot apply it to the character that can play in that scenario.Yes, yes you can. The actual rule that's been in the last couple of guides has been explained above. If they wish to remove the possibility of such an option, it would be an easy change of language (as they have (or at least had) such language for module play), but they haven't.
For modules and Adventure Path content below 9th level, if you do not have a character in the correct level range,
you may use a Pathfinder Society pregenerated character,
available on paizo.com or the 1st- and 7th-level iconic
characters on pages 275–297 of the Pathfinder RPG NPC
Codex.
Change the first clause to, "For all scenarios levels 1-11, and modules and Adventure Path content below 9th level,...".
Grumpus RPG Superstar 2014 Top 32 |
MisterSlanky |
I know what your saying Mr Slanky, but seasons are a lot harder now. Players playing up a whole tier should know what they are getting into. Season 5 on has been brutal.
Which is completely irrelevant to the argument I made. Educate players, warn them what they are getting into, but never "tell" somebody to play a pregen to make it easier for the other players.
Chess Pwn |
Mike Eckrich wrote:I know what your saying Mr Slanky, but seasons are a lot harder now. Players playing up a whole tier should know what they are getting into. Season 5 on has been brutal.Which is completely irrelevant to the argument I made. Educate players, warn them what they are getting into, but never "tell" somebody to play a pregen to make it easier for the other players.
Your lv2 druid will hurt the lv4-5 tier group "a lot" in this session. I think you should play the pregen Kyra.
From what you posted that's what the GM did. Said the player would be over their head and make it harder for everyone. Then recommended that playing a pregen, especially the cleric, would be helpful. Maybe there was a strong haunt, so the cleric would be the only one to do anything against it.
Andrew Christian |
Auke Teeninga wrote:Sniggevert wrote:Could you please make a suggestion for this easy change?Andrew Christian wrote:You cannot apply it to the character that can play in that scenario.Yes, yes you can. The actual rule that's been in the last couple of guides has been explained above. If they wish to remove the possibility of such an option, it would be an easy change of language (as they have (or at least had) such language for module play), but they haven't.Guide pg. 30 wrote:For modules and Adventure Path content below 9th level, if you do not have a character in the correct level range,
you may use a Pathfinder Society pregenerated character,
available on paizo.com or the 1st- and 7th-level iconic
characters on pages 275–297 of the Pathfinder RPG NPC
Codex.Change the first clause to, "For all scenarios levels 1-11, and modules and Adventure Path content below 9th level,...".
As has been mentioned, Mike stated in a message board posts, that you cannot assign a pregen credit to a character that could play that scenario.
I don't have a link as I'm on my phone.
Ascalaphus Venture-Lieutenant, Netherlands—Leiden |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |
As has been mentioned, Mike stated in a message board posts, that you cannot assign a pregen credit to a character that could play that scenario.I don't have a link as I'm on my phone.
You're going to have to dig up that link to convince me, because here is a link to a post of Mike saying the opposite:
This is already covered in the Guide on page 6:
If you play a 1st-level pregenerated character, you can apply the credit for her first adventure to a newly created character of your very own. If you play a non-1st-level pregenerated character, you apply the credit to your character as soon as she reaches the level of the pregenerated character played. You may not apply a Chronicle sheet earned with a pregenerated character to a character that was already at the level of the pregenerated character or higher, as you should have used this character for the scenario instead.
Ascalaphus Venture-Lieutenant, Netherlands—Leiden |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I would like to add that I think the current rule for scenarios should not be changed. IMO there are no big downsides to the current rule and it has many benefits. Among which are:
- Players can use pregens to try out new classes (which is even explicitly mentioned as one of their uses in the Guide).
- Players can use pregens if they don't have their character sheet handy.
- Players can use pregens to even out the level distribution of a party, which can be more fun than a weirdly skewed one.
- Players can use pregens to create a more rounded party; the game can be more fun with a Merisiel instead of a fourth 2H beatstick. Or maybe what this party really needs is Lem's social skills. (It's happened more than once.)
- Perhaps you want the chronicle sheet on PC 3, but he's too low level to play; you don't want it on PC 2 because he's not the right class to make use of it. (Let's assume that you know what's on the chronicle because you GMed the scenario last year and credited it to PC 1.) By using a pregen you can play, instead of having to not play today because then you'd be forced to play the scenario with PC 2.
- The scenario just looks like it'd be more fun with a certain pregen than with your PC.
The only things I'd like to see changed are:
- Clarify if modules use the same rules as scenarios. I think that would be best (respecting that some scenarios have no in-tier pregens of course).
- Clarify the relation between pregen faction and faction-related boons, especially Grand Lodge stuff.
waltero |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I would like to add that I think the current rule for scenarios should not be changed. IMO there are no big downsides to the current rule and it has many benefits. Among which are:
- Players can use pregens to try out new classes (which is even explicitly mentioned as one of their uses in the Guide).
- Players can use pregens if they don't have their character sheet handy.
- Players can use pregens to even out the level distribution of a party, which can be more fun than a weirdly skewed one.
- Players can use pregens to create a more rounded party; the game can be more fun with a Merisiel instead of a fourth 2H beatstick. Or maybe what this party really needs is Lem's social skills. (It's happened more than once.)
- Perhaps you want the chronicle sheet on PC 3, but he's too low level to play; you don't want it on PC 2 because he's not the right class to make use of it. (Let's assume that you know what's on the chronicle because you GMed the scenario last year and credited it to PC 1.) By using a pregen you can play, instead of having to not play today because then you'd be forced to play the scenario with PC 2.
- The scenario just looks like it'd be more fun with a certain pregen than with your PC.The only things I'd like to see changed are:
- Clarify if modules use the same rules as scenarios. I think that would be best (respecting that some scenarios have no in-tier pregens of course).
- Clarify the relation between pregen faction and faction-related boons, especially Grand Lodge stuff.
Another appropriate situation could be if your only range-eligible character is currently running through a multipart scenario or module and would level out of that series and be unable to complete it should you play the character now.
Nefreet |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
This discussion was just had over a month ago.
If you can't find your point in those 261 posts, then feel free to post it here.
To sum up: Yes, you may always choose to play an in-tier Pregen if you wish.
The Fox |
Ascalaphus wrote:Another appropriate situation could be if your only range-eligible character is currently running through a multipart scenario or module and would level out of that series and be unable to complete it should you play the character now.I would like to add that I think the current rule for scenarios should not be changed. IMO there are no big downsides to the current rule and it has many benefits. Among which are:
- Players can use pregens to try out new classes (which is even explicitly mentioned as one of their uses in the Guide).
- Players can use pregens if they don't have their character sheet handy.
- Players can use pregens to even out the level distribution of a party, which can be more fun than a weirdly skewed one.
- Players can use pregens to create a more rounded party; the game can be more fun with a Merisiel instead of a fourth 2H beatstick. Or maybe what this party really needs is Lem's social skills. (It's happened more than once.)
- Perhaps you want the chronicle sheet on PC 3, but he's too low level to play; you don't want it on PC 2 because he's not the right class to make use of it. (Let's assume that you know what's on the chronicle because you GMed the scenario last year and credited it to PC 1.) By using a pregen you can play, instead of having to not play today because then you'd be forced to play the scenario with PC 2.
- The scenario just looks like it'd be more fun with a certain pregen than with your PC.The only things I'd like to see changed are:
- Clarify if modules use the same rules as scenarios. I think that would be best (respecting that some scenarios have no in-tier pregens of course).
- Clarify the relation between pregen faction and faction-related boons, especially Grand Lodge stuff.
Yet another appropriate situation is, "I only have one character who is in tier for that scenario, but I hate that character so much that if I'm forced to play him in a scenario then I will do everything in my power to cause his untimely demise so as to never again be forced to play that terrible sack of..."
I think that was the issue that prodded me to start the thread linked by Nefreet above. A player was told that he had to play a character that he hated so much that the player was thinking of leaving the campaign behind.