DRD1812 |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
So here's how it happened in my game. After our wizard cast his feeblemind on the assassin, the dude stabbed the hostage just like he'd threatened.
When the smoke cleared, the duchess (and her one remaining hit point) demanded an explanation. “What in the hells is the matter with you? I could have been killed!”
“Meh,” said the wizard. “We’ve got breath of life as backup. You wouldn’t have been killed for long.”
That's a fully rules-legal take, but it doesn't strike me as a very satisfying one. Is there a good way to make the old "human shield" shtick an actually-challenging challenge? How would you design this trope in your games?
Anguish |
You kind of can't with this system. The moment the talking is over, it's roll-for-initiative. If the hostage-taker wins initiative, it's coup-de-grace and the hostage is dead. If they don't, you've got until their turn to nuke them or somehow get the hostage out. Total gamble.
As for the roleplay side of things, that's when the duchess throws her (not inconsiderable) influence into ruining the Chaotic-Neutral party's reputation. "You wouldn't've been killed for long" isn't Good, and relying on luck is the antithesis of Law.
Foeclan |
There's a saving throw involved in a coup de grace if they survive the damage, which would leave them dead regardless of HP if they failed. That wouldn't matter when it comes to Breath of Life, mind you, but by the time they have 5th level spells, they're probably beyond a challenge like that anyway.
That said, it's completely appropriate for the subject of such a situation to be upset about being literally dead. I can't imagine that having your throat slit is a pleasant experience, even (especially) if you survive it.
SheepishEidolon |
Some mid-game options:
Add a quickened death knell.
Make the knife user an assassin 4+ for a more difficult raise dead.
Make the knife user a time oracle with Erase from Time. The ability won't kill the victim, but has a good chance to shock the players.
Beforehand add unwilling shield to the victim, so you only need to deal some damage to it to make things complicated for the party.
OmniMage |
I had considered using a merciful fireball so I could attack without fear of killing the hostage... but then I double checked the rules and to do so would probably kill the hostage. The rules dictate that if you suffer enough nonlethal damage to equal your maximum hit points, then the excess damage becomes lethal. If I assume that the hostage is a level 1 aristocrat, then they probably have no more than 8 hit points. A merciful fireball that deals 10d6 damage, average damage being 35, would easily inflict 8 points of nonlethal damage and then deal 27 points of lethal damage leaving the hostage with -19 hit points. Most people would be dead at that point.
A merciful weapon is less likely to kill the hostage simply because it doesn't deal so much damage in one hit. If the hostage taker doesn't know any better, then stabbing the hostage to harm the villain will look like you don't care about the hostage at all and likely lead to them dumping the hostage to get away. Maybe.
Kasoh |
It also depends on how prepared the Breath of Life back up is. Unless a divine caster has it prepared or the wizard has lesser wish ready to go, its probably a spell use item or a scroll.
The most common scenario in my mind is cleric casting breath of life from a scroll.
Clerics are medium armor users, and most likely have a reduced move speed. And unless they have a scroll tube in their spring loaded wrist sheath or glove or storing, they need a move action to retrieve the scroll, then move adjacent. By the time its their turn again, its too late to cast.
A cleric with it prepared has less issues, and a cleric that prepared a reach breath of life is A) Really paranoid and B) not preparing Heal, so yeah, they earned it.
The higher level you go, the less of an issue this is. That's the game. Different challenges for different levels of power.
Bjørn Røyrvik |
The higher level you go, the less of an issue this is. That's the game. Different challenges for different levels of power.
This really must be emphasized. So many things that are difficult IRL or in certain systems just aren't a problem in higher level D&D. The human shield thing is one of them.
The best way to do this at mid+ levels would be, I think, to have the shields off site. Tell the PCs that you have hostages and they will be killed under certain conditions. This may be difficult to do without some planning, but making sure the PCs can't fix the situation right there will make hostages a bit more valuable.
TxSam88 |
You kind of can't with this system. The moment the talking is over, it's roll-for-initiative. If the hostage-taker wins initiative, it's coup-de-grace and the hostage is dead. If they don't, you've got until their turn to nuke them or somehow get the hostage out. Total gamble.
As for the roleplay side of things, that's when the duchess throws her (not inconsiderable) influence into ruining the Chaotic-Neutral party's reputation. "You wouldn't've been killed for long" isn't Good, and relying on luck is the antithesis of Law.
Hostages that have a knife at their throat aren't generally considered helpless, so a coup-de-grace is generally not an option unless they are also bound.
the David |
Anguish wrote:Hostages that have a knife at their throat aren't generally considered helpless, so a coup-de-grace is generally not an option unless they are also bound.You kind of can't with this system. The moment the talking is over, it's roll-for-initiative. If the hostage-taker wins initiative, it's coup-de-grace and the hostage is dead. If they don't, you've got until their turn to nuke them or somehow get the hostage out. Total gamble.
As for the roleplay side of things, that's when the duchess throws her (not inconsiderable) influence into ruining the Chaotic-Neutral party's reputation. "You wouldn't've been killed for long" isn't Good, and relying on luck is the antithesis of Law.
No, but they could be pinned, so sneak attack is an option.
I guess the weird thing here is the wizard using Feeblemind in this situation. As far as I can tell, that won't do much as the dude should still be able to attack and loses their ability to understand you, but not the ability to distinguish friends from foes. I have had players go all Leeroy Jenkins before, but this is a ridiculously stupid move.
Then again, a hostage situation like this is always kinda pointless. You can't kill your hostage, because then you don't have a hostage anymore... leaving you an easy target. The only way out is by surrendering. I get that it's a cinematic trope, but it's just not a strategic move.
I wonder if we could give this a fantasy spin that would work better, like threatening to release the Efreeti in the bottle.
Edit: See, this is what I mean. If you follow the link, you'll find that the assassin chose to grapple his target, rather than just use his death attack. Why would anyone do that? Ofcourse your NPC is going to seem inept if you don't use their strengths.
TL;DR: A hostage situation is great in a popcorn flick, but it's not so great in any other setting.
SheepishEidolon |
Then again, a hostage situation like this is always kinda pointless. You can't kill your hostage, because then you don't have a hostage anymore... leaving you an easy target. The only way out is by surrendering. I get that it's a cinematic trope, but it's just not a strategic move.
Surrendering requires some basic trust in the opposite side. Even if they would deserve that trust, the hostage taker would also have to perceive it that way.
And if you have a hostage, you can do more than either kill or not kill them. You can hurt them to increase pressure, since their allies don't want that either. In Pathfinder / DnD it might have to be more than HP damage, but a Con poison could already be enough. Upgrade to negative levels or destruction of soul if necessary.
And if the opposite side trusts you in returning the hostage, you can actually move to a safer place. In Pathfinder / DnD that might be a teleportation circle or a magic gate. And a solid Sense Motive check might convince even skeptical players that it could work out.
TxSam88 |
A pinned creature is helpless.
Helpless wrote:A helpless character is paralyzed, held, bound, sleeping, unconscious, or otherwise completely at an opponent’s mercy.Pinned wrote:A pinned creature is tightly bound and can take few actions.
I see someone who has a knife to their throat as a little less than grappled. grappled characters are not helpless.
Dale McCoy Jr Jon Brazer Enterprises |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Have you read Death's Heretic?
Something like that might work as well. Breath of life just fails, or the body is fine but the person never wakes up because they're not there.
Then the adventurers have to free the soul from entrapment.
Foeclan |
Have you read Death's Heretic?
** spoiler omitted **
Something like that might work as well. Breath of life just fails, or the body is fine but the person never wakes up because they're not there.
** spoiler omitted **
Then the adventurers have to free the soul from entrapment.
It can fail for other reasons, too, like the soul not being willing. Maybe they decide to move on out of spite, or maybe they're in on it and have made their own arrangements with someone else. Either way, the PCs may be in trouble.
Temperans |
Temperans wrote:I see someone who has a knife to their throat as a little less than grappled. grappled characters are not helpless.A pinned creature is helpless.
Helpless wrote:A helpless character is paralyzed, held, bound, sleeping, unconscious, or otherwise completely at an opponent’s mercy.Pinned wrote:A pinned creature is tightly bound and can take few actions.
Being pinned is being grappled by definition. You have to first grapple someone before you can pin them.
If we are talking hostage situation than odds are that the person in question Pinned. If they are not pinned than they wouldn't be able to coup without specific feats/abilities. Last time I checked Slayers and Assassins have ways to execute people as a standard action, even if they are not helpless. As for Assassin's ability to prevent revival not being good, you could easily just buff it or add an item that buffs it, it wouldn't be unprecedented.
Senko |
So a few things to bear in mind . . .
1) The soul must be free, I've always run that as the god (Pharasma in this setting) must be willing to allow its return. So any death always carries that chance of this time they don't come back if the ability mentions the soul being free. Even if you don't go this route there's plenty of fantasy soul stealing weapons even in modern superhero comics Katana's katana takes the victims soul. You could easily make a custom weapon that uses its victims souls to power its abilities. Doesn't even have to be irreversible just very difficult and possibly with a time limit. "The Duchess doesn't respond to breath of life. Why? Well make a knowledge arcana check . . . you recognize the dagger the assasin was holding as the dagger of Kali a weapon regarded as an abomination by pharasman priesthood. Anyone slain by it has thier soul sealed with the gem on the hilt to power its magical abilites when the gem turns from black to white the soul has been destroyed. How do you get it out? Well now that is the question maybe you can ask around see if any of your contacts know a way but it is an artifact.
2) Breath of life fails if the subject is killed by a death effect easy enough to bring into the encounter I'm sure (the assasin prestige can get it on their attacks). Even aside from that they have to heal enough to restore them to a certain level. 5d8 + 25 (max) is not bad but if you roll badly or the cou de grace was bad enough and you don't restore them to that threshold they remain dead.
3) As others have said cou de grace. . .
You automatically hit and score a critical hit. If the defender survives the damage, he must make a Fortitude save (DC 10 + damage dealt) or die. A rogue also gets her extra sneak attack damage against a helpless opponent when delivering a coup de grace.
I don't know what level your party is but lets assume 9th as the cleric was casting breath of life. That's a 5d6 sneak attack + 2d4 for a dagger not counting any magic or the like + a save vs death. Sure breath of life does more but dice rolls are variable. I've never used them but I'm sure there's con draining poisons he could have on the blade lowering her hp and chance of anything like breath of life working. When you factor in magic a Bane Weapon +1 equivilent adds 2d6 damage to any humans being stabbed
Temperans |
To spice up coup de grace you could rule that it is a defacto death effect based on the definition of death effect.
The logic:
* Death effect are attacks, that when the target fails their save they take a whole lot of damage or die.
* Coup de grace are attacks, that when the target fails their save they die.
Now anyone that dies from a coup de grace cannot be saved by a breath of life. You can however prevent it with deathward.
Name Violation |
To spice up coup de grace you could rule that it is a defacto death effect based on the definition of death effect.
The logic:
* Death effect are attacks, that when the target fails their save they take a whole lot of damage or die.
* Coup de grace are attacks, that when the target fails their save they die.
Now anyone that dies from a coup de grace cannot be saved by a breath of life. You can however prevent it with deathward.
Nope. Then death ward would make you immune to coup de grace
In most cases, a death attack allows the victim a Fortitude save to avoid the effect, but if the save fails, the creature takes a large amount of damage, which might cause it to die instantly.
Raise dead doesn’t work on someone killed by a death attack or effect.
Death attacks slay instantly. A victim cannot be made stable and thereby kept alive.
In case it matters, a dead character, no matter how he died, has hit points equal to or less than his negative Constitution score.
The spell death ward protects against these attacks.
Temperans |
That's literally what I said.Temperans wrote:To spice up coup de grace you could rule that it is a defacto death effect based on the definition of death effect.
The logic:
* Death effect are attacks, that when the target fails their save they take a whole lot of damage or die.
* Coup de grace are attacks, that when the target fails their save they die.
Now anyone that dies from a coup de grace cannot be saved by a breath of life. You can however prevent it with deathward.
Nope. Then death ward would make you immune to coup de grace
Quote:
In most cases, a death attack allows the victim a Fortitude save to avoid the effect, but if the save fails, the creature takes a large amount of damage, which might cause it to die instantly.
Raise dead doesn’t work on someone killed by a death attack or effect.
Death attacks slay instantly. A victim cannot be made stable and thereby kept alive.
In case it matters, a dead character, no matter how he died, has hit points equal to or less than his negative Constitution score.
The spell death ward protects against these attacks.
Now anyone that dies from a coup de grace cannot be saved by a breath of life. You can however prevent it with deathwyard.
Did you perhaps though I said that death ward wouldn't help?
Also note that Death Wards grants a bonus on the save and a save to negate. It does not automatically negate death effects. Hence why I said it would spice it up.
*Khan* |
I assume that the assassin has readied an action to kill the victim if certain conditions (unknown to the players) are met.
So no intitiativ roll. This is why hostage situations are difficult.
Besides the victim will most likely grant cover to the assassin.
Breath of life/raise dead/speak with dead etc. change the situation and hired killers will make extra effort to avoid that as allready mentioned.
Kasoh |
I assume that the assassin has readied an action to kill the victim if certain conditions (unknown to the players) are met.
So no intitiativ roll. This is why hostage situations are difficult.
Besides the victim will most likely grant cover to the assassin.Breath of life/raise dead/speak with dead etc. change the situation and hired killers will make extra effort to avoid that as allready mentioned.
Technically, readying is a special action taken during initiative so you can't ready actions outside of initiative.
Of course, an assassin could probably prepare an action in the non game term sense to the same effect, but I feel like the distinction is important.
VoodistMonk |
Hostage situations take some bending of the normal rules...
The hostage is helpless, and will be subject to a readied CdG [say the villain has the Throat Slicer feat]. Bonus points if you give the villain Achaekek's Mantis Embrace gloves, so the hostage's "head erupts in a geyser of blood, preventing life-restoring spells that require an intact body."
If the party allows the villain to finish their BS speech, the hostage dies.
If the party takes action immediately, ignoring the villain's stupid speech, the party gets a surprise round. The party must subdue the villain in the surprise round, or the readied CdG kills the hostage.
ErichAD |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I figure that knife to throat is sufficient to qualify for the "otherwise completely at an opponent's mercy" part of coup de grace. For NPCs at any rate. I also figure combat would be started with the hostage being taken if not before hand, so surprise rounds wouldn't figure into it, but readying would.
Death not being the worst possible fate is always a problem in later Pathfinder. Instant death effects mean instant life effects need to be in there as well, or adventure ends about as abruptly as it does in real life. If you want the same drama at higher levels, you need to update the threat to something not as easily overcome.
They aren't just dead 1, but dead 2! We need a resurrection 2! Soul trapping, soul destruction, instant aging to death, made undead, and so on and so forth.
Maybe the kingdom has laws regarding succession and a person's first death, in order to avoid resurrection of dead nobility causing endless succession wars.
TxSam88 |
I figure that knife to throat is sufficient to qualify for the "otherwise completely at an opponent's mercy" part of coup de grace.
I disagree, the classic villain grabbing the hostage, pulling them in front of them and holding a knife to their throat, isn't even a grapple, much less "at an opponent's mercy". But I will admit that allowing it for NPC's and a theatrical scene it might be appropriate, however, RAW, I am not on board.
VoodistMonk |
That is why I said the situation requires some bending of the rules... and a willing audience.
If some rules-lawyer deems it necessary to chime in with exactly how far the rules have been bent, then it's not worth presenting similar situations in the future. Apologize for wasting the group's time trying something Karin doesn't approve of, and move on with the story... avoiding anything that might even hint at bending or breaking the sacred rules ever again.
Or, politely tell Karin to GTFOH, and post an opening at your table on whatever platform you use to find players.
Java Man |
A central part of how I handle this is to use the rule for starting a full round action in one round and finishing it in the next. Now the HR part is to allow the second standard action to be delayed, if a reasonable explanation can be made as to how that works. Now the second, standard action, half of a CdG can be readied or performed during a surprise round.
ErichAD |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
ErichAD wrote:I figure that knife to throat is sufficient to qualify for the "otherwise completely at an opponent's mercy" part of coup de grace.I disagree, the classic villain grabbing the hostage, pulling them in front of them and holding a knife to their throat, isn't even a grapple, much less "at an opponent's mercy". But I will admit that allowing it for NPC's and a theatrical scene it might be appropriate, however, RAW, I am not on board.
All a grapple does is remove the target's ability to move away from the attacker, restrict the use of one of their arms, and make it harder to take physical actions. Grabbing someone's arm fulfills all that. Pinning someone to your chest with one arm seems more than sufficient to be a grapple. Traditionally, the victim can do nothing before freeing themselves, so possible even pinned.
Whether or not "knife to throat" is at someone's mercy I'll agree is debatable, but not even grappled is a stretch.
Temperans |
There are even rules for grappling with 1 hand (you take a penalty to the roll) there are also feats that make it so you are able to pin someone in a single round (Greater Grappling).
The only reason not to allow it is disliking how it looks. But its something that is clearly poasible within the rules.
Kasoh |
That is why I said the situation requires some bending of the rules... and a willing audience.
If some rules-lawyer deems it necessary to chime in with exactly how far the rules have been bent, then it's not worth presenting similar situations in the future. Apologize for wasting the group's time trying something Karin doesn't approve of, and move on with the story... avoiding anything that might even hint at bending or breaking the sacred rules ever again.
Or, politely tell Karin to GTFOH, and post an opening at your table on whatever platform you use to find players.
Its not like this is a game with rules or anything. Rules that are there to prevent GMs from doing whatever arbitrary nonsense they want because 'drama'. The rules of the game are there to give all the parties standardized set of expectations on how the world works. If the players don't know how the world operates they can't make informed decisions about their actions.
Pathfinder isn't a movie, it isn't a novel and everyone's lives are better when people don't treat it that way.
Waterhammer |
Its not like this is a game with rules or anything. Rules that are there to prevent GMs from doing whatever arbitrary nonsense they want because 'drama'. The rules of the game are there to give all the parties standardized set of expectations on how the world works. If the players don't know how the world operates they can't make informed decisions about their actions.
Pathfinder isn't a movie, it isn't a novel and everyone's lives are better when people don't treat it that way.
I completely agree that the GM needs to stick to the rules as much as possible. Playing with GM Cheaterpants soon becomes tedious. On the other hand, the rules don’t cover every situation. ( Though in this case, the grapple rules do cover it.)
What drew me to D&D years ago was my love of fantasy novels, and my desire to place myself into the story. The same holds true for Pathfinder, today. If the game doesn’t provide some sort of feel of being a story. a novel, or a movie, then it would hold no draw for me. If Pathfinder is reduced to a mere war game, well, there are better ones. Chess, for example.
Kasoh |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I completely agree that the GM needs to stick to the rules as much as possible. Playing with GM Cheaterpants soon becomes tedious. On the other hand, the rules don’t cover every situation. ( Though in this case, the grapple rules do cover it.)
What drew me to D&D years ago was my love of fantasy novels, and my desire to place myself into the story. The same holds true for Pathfinder, today. If the game doesn’t provide some sort of feel of being a story. a novel, or a movie, then it would hold no draw for me. If Pathfinder is reduced to a mere war game, well, there are better ones. Chess, for example.
Its not that one can't have dramatic scenes or climatic moments in Pathfinder, but the rules of cinema or novels are different, for telling different kinds of stories.
The knife to hostage crisis is a good example. In other forms of media, the hostage scenario is doing exactly what it is out there to do. That could be: Getting the villain away from the heroes, showcasing the hero's skill, the defiance of the hostage, etc etc. When the cocky cowboy cop shoots the hostage taker with a crack shot, suddenly we know a lot about them. That scene was engineered to provide all that information and more. More importantly, there was no chance it could fail. It could only turn out the way the author intended it to.
In a game like Pathfinder, there's no way to know* how the party will actually react. It depends on alignment, how roleplay heavy the group is, how tactical they are, what spells the wizard has prepared and a bevy of other things. And, for everything else there's a chance that it will all go sideways based on the roll of the dice.
Coup de Grace? NPC Nat 20'd the fort save.
Drag the hostage out? Flubbed the grapple check to move.
Rez the victim? Not enough actions left in your turn.
Hostage taker sneak attacked to death by the crit-fishing-large-falcata-wielding-greater invisible-Slayer.
In a desperate gamble, the bard draws 1d3 wishes from the Harrow Deck of Many Things.
Putting a party into a scenario and letting them handle it and watching the consequences of their decisions and the development of the story from those decisions is the best part of running a table.
The whole thing works best when everyone is leaning into the rules to enable the story as opposed to fighting it.
And, without even getting into rules, you can tell this scenario is different in an RPG because what happens isn't the result of 'What do I need this scene to accomplish' but instead by answering, 'What does this NPC taking a hostage want to accomplish?' Because knowing why an NPC is doing this means you know if they are willing to negotiate, if they're doing this just to hurt the PCs, if they're willing to die for this, and everything else that makes how the PCs respond to it pertinent and meaningful.
DRD1812 |
*Khan* wrote:I assume that the assassin has readied an action to kill the victim if certain conditions (unknown to the players) are met.
So no intitiativ roll. This is why hostage situations are difficult.
Besides the victim will most likely grant cover to the assassin.Breath of life/raise dead/speak with dead etc. change the situation and hired killers will make extra effort to avoid that as allready mentioned.
Technically, readying is a special action taken during initiative so you can't ready actions outside of initiative.
Of course, an assassin could probably prepare an action in the non game term sense to the same effect, but I feel like the distinction is important.
Even worse, coup de grace is a full round action, so it's not even a legal option for the ready action. :/
Temperans |
Kasoh wrote:Even worse, coup de grace is a full round action, so it's not even a legal option for the ready action. :/*Khan* wrote:I assume that the assassin has readied an action to kill the victim if certain conditions (unknown to the players) are met.
So no intitiativ roll. This is why hostage situations are difficult.
Besides the victim will most likely grant cover to the assassin.Breath of life/raise dead/speak with dead etc. change the situation and hired killers will make extra effort to avoid that as allready mentioned.
Technically, readying is a special action taken during initiative so you can't ready actions outside of initiative.
Of course, an assassin could probably prepare an action in the non game term sense to the same effect, but I feel like the distinction is important.
This is why Slayers are OP as actual assassins. Thanks to Merciless Butchery feat a Slayer (or a character with Studied Target and enough sneak attack dice) can attempt a coup de grace against any target that is cowering, helpless, or stunned as a standard action without provoking.
Thus a Slayer is able to ready an action to coup de grace. It gets even more wonky if you go full slayer grapple build due to grapple sneak attack shenanigans.
Senko |
DRD1812 wrote:Kasoh wrote:Even worse, coup de grace is a full round action, so it's not even a legal option for the ready action. :/*Khan* wrote:I assume that the assassin has readied an action to kill the victim if certain conditions (unknown to the players) are met.
So no intitiativ roll. This is why hostage situations are difficult.
Besides the victim will most likely grant cover to the assassin.Breath of life/raise dead/speak with dead etc. change the situation and hired killers will make extra effort to avoid that as allready mentioned.
Technically, readying is a special action taken during initiative so you can't ready actions outside of initiative.
Of course, an assassin could probably prepare an action in the non game term sense to the same effect, but I feel like the distinction is important.
This is why Slayers are OP as actual assassins. Thanks to Merciless Butchery feat a Slayer (or a character with Studied Target and enough sneak attack dice) can attempt a coup de grace against any target that is cowering, helpless, or stunned as a standard action without provoking.
Thus a Slayer is able to ready an action to coup de grace. It gets even more wonky if you go full slayer grapple build due to grapple sneak attack shenanigans.
14th level: Quarry - All crits autoconfirm.
20th level: Make a single attack and declare its a "kill" - succeed at a fortitude save or die even if you survive the damage.They are indeed very scary.
Anguish |
Kasoh wrote:Even worse, coup de grace is a full round action, so it's not even a legal option for the ready action. :/*Khan* wrote:I assume that the assassin has readied an action to kill the victim if certain conditions (unknown to the players) are met.
So no intitiativ roll. This is why hostage situations are difficult.
Besides the victim will most likely grant cover to the assassin.Breath of life/raise dead/speak with dead etc. change the situation and hired killers will make extra effort to avoid that as allready mentioned.
Technically, readying is a special action taken during initiative so you can't ready actions outside of initiative.
Of course, an assassin could probably prepare an action in the non game term sense to the same effect, but I feel like the distinction is important.
I know the argument, but Berserker sphere has a talent - Decapitate - which lets you do it as a Standard action.
So if a DM wants to set this scenario up, it can be done. Just requires the right tools.
Azothath |
DRD1812 Wrote: anecdote of game and analysis.
the anecdote is a bit unclear but the wizard is incorrect on Breath of Life(BoL) as the Action Economy is very restrictive. Invigorating Repose:5C needs to be cast Before to extend the effect of BoL so the dead guy & caster have more time. Gloves of Healing are also a way to do Action Economy.
Clearly there's some metagaming and stepping out of character in dialogue. The NPC likely doesn't know the spell but will be informed by her advisors of the consequences and risks. The NPC should be upset with the cavalier nature of the PC group.
The party isn't very risk averse and doesn't understand how spells work. I'd agree that Feeblemind would reduce the choice of actions and precipitate a simple assassination attempt as the emotion remains. It's a very poor choice in that situation. Why not cast Resilient Sphere:4 or Liberating Command:1 on the NPC or Break:1 or Aversion:4 on the BBEG. Of course hindsight is better as there's time.
I'd say there's a disconnect as you(the GM) want more drama and a more theatric story/acting in character. The Players seem to be more on the expedient and egocentric side of things just based on your anecdote.
My advice is to have the players vote on best in game acting and most dramatic moment in the game and give out a small XP reward.