Does any one else find pathfinder APs abit low on cash?
even in a 4 PC party they always seem a little... below the recomended cash per level.
I know that expendables like potions and scrolls should be accounted for but I am wondering if this is just a genral norm for pathfinder APs or if I am doing something wrong.
It's enough, I find.
The authors probably also know that it's easier to add more, as a DM, than it is to remove anything.
Actually, I have found that Council of Thieves has way too much treasure in the early modules.
There was a luckstone analog given out in the 3rd module at a point when the players hit level 7. That alone is way too much for a single item but combined with everything else handed out it was really too much.
However, after tweaking the treasure to be more in line with what should be given out I have found CoT to be great.
- Gauss
Some of the earlier ones (Rise of the Runelords in particular) have tons of treasure. I learned the other day that the party wizard was walking around with 15,000 gp in his pockets.
However some of the later AP's (I'm looking at you kingmaker) do seem a little light on treasure.
Kingmaker is a bit light on the money but I believe it's to take into account withdraws from the Treasury as well as selling the magic items during the kingdom running stage.
If your group didn't do that, however, I can understand feeling a bit slighted for treasure.
