seekerofshadowlight |
Here are the rules from page one of this thread.
nightflier wrote:more character creation rules, such as point buy.In the main houserules document:
1. Roll 4d6, drop the lowest.
2. Repeat 5 more times.
3. Arrange those 6 stats in any order.Hit points are max at 1st level, either average or rolled (your choice) thereafter.
kyrt-ryder |
kyrt-ryder wrote:I don't know if that would be possible, but my idea hasn't been officially confirmed as ok either, so...In general, if the referee doesn't immediately try to talk you out of something, it means he's probably willing to go with your idea and see where it leads!
Excellent. Then I guess I'll go ahead and go with that. Now I just have to go back up and find the level to build to.
Kirth Gersen |
14, 17, 16, 17, 14, 14 (I believe, if I've miscounted please correct me.)
I count 15, 17, 16, 17, 14, 14. Holy shla-MOLy! You're some kind of genetic freak among goblins... obviously you are the whelp of a greater barghest and a goblin slave, and just don't realize it yet.
--You guys will be coming in at 3rd level.
kyrt-ryder |
kyrt-ryder wrote:14, 17, 16, 17, 14, 14 (I believe, if I've miscounted please correct me.)I count 15, 17, 16, 17, 14, 14. Holy shla-MOly! You're some kind of genetic freak among goblins... obviously you are the whelp of a greater barghest and a goblin slave, and just don't realize it yet.
Oh wow you're right, that first digit is a 15. Thanks Kirth ^_^
And that could be a pretty cool backstory, I'll take it into consideration. Also, 3rd level, got it. One level too low to go Goblin Paragon and a level of Ranger, but oh well no big deal.
TOZ |
Doodlebug Anklebiter wrote:Woops! I didn't read ahead, I just started with the Race and Class docs and didn't see the Introduction doc below it.If the Intro doesn't scare you off, nothing will. That's why we hid it below the others...
I may add 'Ch 0' to the front of the file name to fix that.
Doodlebug Anklebiter |
I count 13. And you'll take a racial penalty to non-goblins! (Let's face it, chicks don't dig short dudes.)
I thought 13 was pretty sexy. For a goblin.
Racial penalty? See, this is the kind of anti-goblin racism in Pathfinder that I've long campaigned against. Now I'll have to add Kirthfinder to the list of things to protest!
Anyway, I've paged through some of the documents. I really dislike reading big, fat walls of text on the screen and I'm out of computer paper, but I think I'm going to go with a goblin druid named Cricket.
Kirth Gersen |
Racial penalty? See, this is the kind of anti-goblin racism in Pathfinder that I've long campaigned against. Now I'll have to add Kirthfinder to the list of things to protest!
Dude. I've had chicks tell me point-blank: "Oh my God! You're cute, and funny, and smart! But you're way too short for me. If you were six inches taller I'd totally do you." None of them believed my exaplantion that height and length inversely correlate... even when I offered to prove it.
I think I'm going to go with a goblin druid named Cricket.
Love it!
Doodlebug Anklebiter |
Doodlebug Anklebiter wrote:Racial penalty? See, this is the kind of anti-goblin racism in Pathfinder that I've long campaigned against. Now I'll have to add Kirthfinder to the list of things to protest!Dude. I've had chicks tell me point-blank: "Oh my God! You're cute, and funny, and smart! But you're way too short for me. If you were six inches taller I'd totally do you." None of them believed my exaplantion that height and length inversely correlate, even when I offered to prove it!
Doodlebug Anklebiter wrote:I think I'm going to go with a goblin druid named Cricket.Love it!
And who said anything about chicks? Cricket is all about the cock!
kyrt-ryder |
Kirth Gersen wrote:Nevertheless, I'm gonna have to call fowl on any further examples.Hee hee!/Groan!
Quote:You're not out of the goblin caves yet!You see this, Kyrt?!? We're not even in the party yet, and they're already killing our kin!
Those are no Kin of mine. This tribe has been digging it's way into my Tribe's territory, and it's about time we brought, them, DOWN!
GO TEAM!
Kirth Gersen |
Are we using the newer rules in your above link once our new gobbos join us? I see the fighter has some differences.
My preference is that each of you, at the time we level up, decide if you want to stick with the older version or rebuild according to the new one. For most of you, there will be negligible differences only.
houstonderek |
You can click on Cadogan above to see what a Rogue 6 Fighter 1 Psion 1 looks like under the new rules.
And if you look for Joachim Arnau under my aliases, that's an archivist cleric under the new rules (don't know if Kirth looked at it yet, so there may be a few mistakes).
And, Kirth, any ruling on how we're doing the Foe bane Rogue talent?
The Egg of Coot |
And, Kirth, any ruling on how we're doing the Foe bane Fighter talent?
I'd like to treat it as a ranger's favored enemy, if that's OK, because that's already an established class feature that provides a breadth of options rather than just raw damage. I've provisionally put that under this Egg of Coot alias, but I'll remove it if there's a lot of feeling that I should change it back.
Vanya Volkov |
Hey, guys. I am glad that this game is still going strong and am really sorry for bailing on you. It was really difficult for me to loose the internet connection for such a long time, especially since I work at home. But my gaming suffered as well, since I run my games and play almost exclusively online now.
Kirth Gersen |
Hey, guys. I am glad that this game is still going strong and am really sorry for bailing on you. It was really difficult for me to loose the internet connection for such a long time, especially since I work at home. But my gaming suffered as well, since I run my games and play almost exclusively online now.
Vanya! You'll see that I didn't kill you off -- although I was about to send you back to Aviona (and out of the action). If you want to continue, though, I'll find a reason not to -- your place is still here if you want it.
Vanya Volkov |
Vanya Volkov wrote:Hey, guys. I am glad that this game is still going strong and am really sorry for bailing on you. It was really difficult for me to loose the internet connection for such a long time, especially since I work at home. But my gaming suffered as well, since I run my games and play almost exclusively online now.Vanya! You'll see that I didn't kill you off -- although I was about to send you back to Aviona (and out of the action). If you want to continue, though, I'll find a reason not to -- your place is still here if you want it.
Wow! Really? Well, I would love to do so. I'm checking your new rules right now. Although, I would like to rework my character, if that's OK and make him more of a martial type, perhaps shuffling around ability stats a bit (such as putting 18 in Strength instead of Charisma).
So, if that's OK, I'm gonna rework him today.
Vanya Volkov |
Several questions: I see that you've included Magus and Wudan as new options for Battle Sorcerer.
1) What are your thoughts on Black Blade ability of the Magus Bladebound archetype?
2) Would you allow two arcane bounds, with an expenditure of a feat, let's call it Extra Bond?
3) I was thinking of playing an Eldritch Knight, but I really just want to have a familiar and black blade, if allowed. I am not that interested in spells, but what are your thoughts of witch hexes? I like the idea of patrons, thematically - I don't care about bonus spells - and hexes are pretty interesting to me. How about replacing Eldritch Blast with hexes?
Of course, these are just questions. I do not insist on any of that.
Kirth Gersen |
1) What are your thoughts on Black Blade ability of the Magus Bladebound archetype?
2) Would you allow two arcane bounds, with an expenditure of a feat, let's call it Extra Bond?
3) I was thinking of playing an Eldritch Knight, but I really just want to have a familiar and black blade, if allowed. I am not that interested in spells, but what are your thoughts of witch hexes? I like the idea of patrons, thematically - I don't care about bonus spells - and hexes are pretty interesting to me. How about replacing Eldritch Blast with hexes?
Reworking characters is fine, and you can plan out most of it now, but please wait until we level to make the changes in play.
1. You mean the "Elric Ripoff" archetype? I didn't even read it at first... hmm. A lot of it works off arcane pool, which is n/a now. That aside, you could emulate most of it by taking the Arcane Bond (weapon) (wizard Appendix A), and then selecting the Arcane Bond feat and choosing the Incorporeal Familiar option (wizard Appendix C), and declare the familiar to be the sword's "spirit" or whatever. That would get you the scaling bonded weapon with sentience. "Life drinker" we might work out by enhancing the weapon later on using personal mojo (see Equipment) -- maybe like a sword of life stealing. The fit isn't perfect, but it's do-able.
2. Yes; see above. However, I'd be very skeptical of, say, two bonded objects.
3. Looks like instead of using Sorcerer as a base spellcasting class, you'd be better off taking Wizard (witch esoteric branch, Appendix E). That gives you the familiar and hexes at the start. Then you'd spend your human bonus feat on the bonded weapon, and take mostly fighter levels thereafter, grabbing the Spellsword fighter talent ASAP -- I'd let you trade fighter talents for hexes in that case.