How to discuss content released in scenarios?


Starfinder Society

**

So, for those who are unaware, there's something of a taboo in this community about discussing rewards from scenarios with those who haven't played. The sentiment comes from a desire to avoid people trying to figure out an "optimal" path of adventures to play, and instead encourage people to play organically.

However, adding new items, spells, and potentially more in scenarios complicates this a bit. While each chronicle so far only provides 1-2 items or spells, trying to fit so much into the player core has left the item selection rather sparse, and these small additions can be valuable to players and GMs outside society play who may not otherwise think to look for them. So, my question for the community is how should we balance these concerns?

This dilemma in context. Spoilers for one of the launch scenarios!:
This thread was inspired by a discussion in the main Starfinder forums about a player dissatisfied with the launch array of sniper weapons and the awkward action economy for Operatives using such weapons. It occured to me that the Reality Ripper from 1-00: Collision's Wake might be what that person is looking for. While it's short ranged, it still could give that person the hard hitting precision weapon woth a magazine they're looking for. But I wasn't certain how to mention this without putting potential spoilers for the scenario in the open. I settled for linking to the item on AoN and warning the link was a potential spoiler

Wayfinders 4/5 5/55/55/55/5 ***** Contributor

I think that is a fine way of handling things, Squark.

Hmm

Community / Forums / Organized Play / Starfinder Society / How to discuss content released in scenarios? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.