HumbleGamer wrote:
So I wouldn't address this as "zero reasons to", just because every player has the right to build the character the way they want ( I get your point and I agree, but if they want to do a specific character, well, I think they should be able to do so ).
I thought I covered that in "unless you want [a Con flaw]." My point wasn't that no one should take a Con flaw, my point was that no one is stuck with one. It's there if they want it, but the current rules don't require it.
The post to which I was responding was expressing that they were worried about having a Con flaw, so my point was that if they wanted to play an Elf or Kobold Wizard, but were hesitant because of the Con flaw, they aren't stuck.