
Purvis Anathema |
Been trying to post this for two weeks. Hopefully it will help with playtesting for folks with different party sizes or when GMs make tweaks to encounters.
Step 1 - Encounter Budget by Party Size
Step 2 - Encounter Building by Party Level
with creatures marked "X" being too hard, and "-" being too easy.
Still to do: page numbers and frequency for most of the critters.
Enjoy. Let me know if you have feedback

DeathQuaker RPG Superstar 2015 Top 8 |

Thank you for this, Samuel. I was (and am) massively struggling with the encounter adjustment/building rules, as the numbers of players I'm working with in different sessions are going to change. This is helpful.
I know the CR system was flawed and variable in effectiveness, but I found it a good enough guideline to start with, and easy enough to wing adjustments as needed--and much easier to memorize adjustments (like 2 creatures of same CR = CR+1). The new system creates SO MUCH MORE WORK, and even though I've been GMing for 15 years, I'm struggling with it a lot (your tables help, but still).
The XP budget thing is especially losing me. I was the kind of GM that never gave XP per encounter, just leveled folks at the right point in the story arc.
If this system remains exactly as it does in the final system, I will not GM Pathfinder 2e (I might play it, but I will not GM it. I will continue to GM playtests, but I have a feeling any encounter adjustments I do will be winged rather than using the rules--but at least these tables above make me more likely to try the XP budget thing again).

Purvis Anathema |
Thanks for your insights and experience. Initially I made these just to help myself understand how the system worked, but then decided to share them since I assumed other people must be doing the same work.
I agree about encounter building - as a DM I've always had trouble with encounter building in every system I've run, so that is just..."par for the course", I guess? With this already done for me hopefully it will smooth things out in playtest. I see what you're saying about prep load, though. Not sure what to do about it.