
Dema_89 |

Hi guys.
Simple but not so obvious question (for me at least). Can i combine the following things?
Taunt
Prerequisites: Cha 13, Small size or smaller.
Benefit: You can demoralize opponents using Bluff rather than Intimidate (see the Intimidate skill description for details) and take no skill check penalty for being smaller than your target.
Bravado’s Blade (Ex)
When a rake hits an opponent and deals sneak attack damage, she can forgo 1d6 points of that damage and make a free Intimidate check to demoralize the foe. For every additional 1d6 points of sneak attack damage she forgoes, she receives a +5 circumstance bonus on this check.
This ability replaces trapfinding.
Thanks in advance

Dema_89 |

I'm not an expert, but I don't see why it wouldn't work. The first specifically says you can use Bluff instead of Intimidate to demoralize a foe, and the second specifically says you're using Intimidate to demoralize a foe. Sounds like it could be a fun character. :)
Thanks, i'm also the idea it will work, i just wanted to be sure because with all the "specific overwrite generic" rule one can never sleep good.
Thanks again

Archaeik |
Rennaivx wrote:I'm not an expert, but I don't see why it wouldn't work. The first specifically says you can use Bluff instead of Intimidate to demoralize a foe, and the second specifically says you're using Intimidate to demoralize a foe. Sounds like it could be a fun character. :)Thanks, i'm also the idea it will work, i just wanted to be sure because with all the "specific overwrite generic" rule one can never sleep good.
Thanks again
Taunt is written kind of awkwardly for its (apparent) intent.
I can see a RAW stickler wagging their finger at you, but RAI is likely that "you can substitute Bluff for any Intimidate:Demoralize skill check"