2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Looking like my biggest pet peeve is items whose description suggests that there's only one of them, crafted by a specific person, for a specific purpose, which is of course undermined by the fact that crafting requirements are listed directly after that.
13 people marked this as a favorite.
|
One more thing about formatting. For the business of writing, it's important. Places that accept submissions usually have writer's guidelines that often include such details as a particular font, font size, and type of file to be submitted. If you can't be bothered to follow those guidelines, then I can assure you that the editors can't be bothered to deal with people that won't work with them. Seriously. I've worked on magazines where failure to meet the basic criteria mean that they won't even read your stuff. Deadlines and high volumes of submissions don't allow for exceptions. They just send out the automatic rejection letter and delete the file. I've seen a thirty page typed manuscript go into the recycling bin because no one had the time to sit and type it into a Word file, so why bother with it?
Pathfinder Maps, Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Starfinder Superscriber
That is a beautiful, frightening Construction Requirement.
Covent wrote: Still have not seen my item... I was well into dedicated last year before I saw mine IIRC.
cwslyclgh wrote: Covent wrote: Still have not seen my item... I was well into dedicated last year before I saw mine IIRC. Yeah, me too. Just tired and was hoping to get lucky today. Thanks for the dose of realism however. I will keep hope alive.
Nice, I've seen lots of repeats, but this is the first repeat of one of my absolute favourites. Pleasure to vote for you again, sir!
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
I finally saw my own item!
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Pathfinder Maps, Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Starfinder Superscriber
Covent wrote: cwslyclgh wrote: Covent wrote: Still have not seen my item... I was well into dedicated last year before I saw mine IIRC. Yeah, me too. Just tired and was hoping to get lucky today. Thanks for the dose of realism however. I will keep hope alive. I haven't seen mine, but I did verify that it was in the list.
got to 200 votes tonight... my eyes are refusing to focus... done for now.
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
What?! Its power level is over 9000!
No formatting and referring to rules elements from AD&D that do not exist in Pathfinder VS no formatting and uses quotes and lots of explanations...
I saw mine in The List but haven't had it pop up in the voting queue. I wanna see it just for the peace of mind that the formatting isn't broken. But, I stopped voting for the evening about an hour ago. Need to get these Christmas letters written and in the mail today/in six hours.
pH unbalanced wrote: Covent wrote: cwslyclgh wrote: Covent wrote: Still have not seen my item... I was well into dedicated last year before I saw mine IIRC. Yeah, me too. Just tired and was hoping to get lucky today. Thanks for the dose of realism however. I will keep hope alive. I haven't seen mine, but I did verify that it was in the list. Oh hey, so's mine!
I didn't even know lists like that could be made public during voting.
This would be a killer item if the abilities hadn't been left vague. It's not like they didn't have room to expand; they've got nearly half the word count left.
Hmm...fart joke item.
That is all.
3 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Saw mine. We still haven't seen my wife's.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Barbarians and goblins and snakes! Oh my!
Also a trend: Channeling items.
Been voting for almost 9 hours straight. But I've seen a few items that were really, really good. Also haven't seen as many repeats this year as last, I wonder why?
Time for bed, more voting after sleep!
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Think I found my favourite ring.
ETA: Might be top 32 material, even.
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Saw my item less than 10 votes in.
Also saw a pretty sweet staff. Really nailed it IMO.
The items price isn't twice it's cost... WHY IS THIS HAPPENING SO MUCH?
Thunderfrog wrote: The items price isn't twice it's cost... WHY IS THIS HAPPENING SO MUCH? I'd be happy if that was the biggest issue I saw on average.
Damn, that is a stylish staff. I'm blown away by how many cool staves I've seen so far.
Joey Haeck wrote: Damn, that is a stylish staff. I'm blown away by how many cool staves I've seen so far. It sounds like a lot of people took the early declaration that staves were Hard Mode as a challenge, and were actually up to said challenge.
Found the first shield I actually like, Nice!
I've seen a couple of uncommon weapon types. One I really liked, and one I really wanted to like.
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
I definitely prefer "ambitious and weird but doesn't quite work" to "works perfectly fine, but not that interesting".
Weapons that are really other items that you happen to also be able to use as a weapon.
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
What... that doesn't... what?
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Thunderfrog wrote: The items price isn't twice it's cost... WHY IS THIS HAPPENING SO MUCH? Because no weapon, armor, or shield should actually be exactly twice it's cost. The cost of the masterwork item should not be halved.
On topic, though, I found a lovely artifact. I think the author put a decent amount of work into it too, sadly.
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
So far I've had several "damn it, those are both really cool." and several "Gah, I'm not a fan of either of these."
Also, holy crap. Even at your meanest so far, you guys are super polite, and the quality of the items is awesome.
Haven't seen my item yet...
ICK! and huge downside... Cursed?! Yeah gonna say cursed...
"Thank you for the offer, but I will have to pass"
」を提供していただきありがとうございますが、私は合格する必要があります」
Whoa, this item reminds me of that [redacted] from [redacted] that I played when I was [redacted] years old!
(Not saying it's the same item or even inspired by it, it's just a similar conceit).
Formatting lacking on several, some really creative stuff too
"When this swords name is spoken..."
Stop right there. I'll never be able to pronounce that crazy jumble of letters.
Whoa, if it can do that and costs that little to make, the whole kingdom would be toast in like two weeks.
Careful not to be too specific about items.
I've only voted for a dozen of pairs so far, but I already saw 2 singing bows, the most strange chainsaw ever, a millenia old copyright infringement, and a lot of [guysname]'s [something].
But I also found two really, really good items. :D
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
"Long ago, a wizard made a magic item that did this thing. Then, he decided it wasn't cool enough, so he made it do this other thing as well."
4 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Yaaay! Finally saw my own item! The formatting applied properly! And it was against an item with no formatting! Time for bed and to wake up again in four hours for work!
That feel where the joke item is actually better than the other item. If only it had proper formatting, I wouldn't feel guilty about voting for it.
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
In a perfect world then the computer would recognize that I'd seen that one four times so it would reduce the wait time, certainly when both are repeats and one is very weak and the other an excitingly top notch one.
Seems I've gone from earthbreakers to whips..
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Well this is fun. I've seen plenty of great things and got to vote on a few great items twice.
Starting to think necromancy is a major theme this year.
You know what I'd like to see at least one of? A lance.
3 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Requirement: Creator must be a halfling pirat, missing his left eye in wrestling contest with a bling gnome half dragon paladin ....
Well not this one, but some requirements seem quite specific
nkerklaan wrote: You know what I'd like to see at least one of? A lance. Not if you saw the lance I just saw.
Thunderfrog wrote: nkerklaan wrote: You know what I'd like to see at least one of? A lance. Not if you saw the lance I just saw. I didn't say I wanted to see a good lance.
Although that would be nice.
|