
Scythia |

I suppose that depends on how you define Humanity.
If you're asking if humans have an exclusive lock on morality, I would say that by human standards they do. Much as they have an exclusive grasp of immorality, by human standards. I should well imagine that any other beings which have intelligence, as well as self-awareness and self/other differentiation probably have different standards or even concepts of "morality".
If we indulge in the idea of fantastic species the issue becomes even more complicated, as beings with vastly different forms will concern themselves with entirely different normative values. A species that does not eat, sleep, breathe, reproduce biologically, or age on a scale that would be in any way comparable to humanity is going to prioritise and promote different things.

![]() |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |

It's always bugged me that humanity is so often seen as having exclusive rights to those best elements often folded into the term "humanity". Especially when dealing with celestials that are descended from human and other mortal souls.
Personally, I'd figure the unifying factor between various human and decidedly non-human approaches to good could be empathy and spin outward from there. Leaves things plenty open for some beings to dip into truly alien morality while still being recognizably good. Like say a being who has difficulty separating individuals from a group but still recognizes when one is in need. So he/she/it/zie/xarblebrop tries to lend assistance scattershot throughout whatever group that individual is a part of, honestly thinking "I'm/We're/This One is helping!"
edit-suddenly reminded of that old New Mutants backissue where
wonders about celestials and benign aberrations with no sense of separation between themselves and others
edit2-ooh, Brethedans

Sissyl |

The basic of morality in humans is our mirror neurons. What they make possible is to imagine you were someone else. So, you would feel resistance to doing something to someone else that you would not want done to you. With more training on this (empathy), you will develop a sense of resistance to doing stuff that you have reason to believe someone might not want done to them, even if you wouldn't mind the same done to you. That is what we call morality. Nothing preventing aliens from having the same mechanisms, indeed it is unlikely they would have societies if they didn't.

Necromancer |

The term "morality" can describe a wide range of benign to atrocious to ridiculous practices that are deemed acceptable and/or mandatory by society. Altruism might be the nominal goal, but morality is just whatever the current mold of cultural values mainstream society thinks might best encourage preferable (from the majority perspective) behavior.
As for "humanity", the term means different things to different people. Some people associate it with an idea of uncommon goodness and empathy. Sure. It's a nice sentiment, but it implies a norm that doesn't currently exist--otherwise we wouldn't say "human nature" when referring to flaws and foibles. When I use "humanity", my intent is to describe either the state of being human or the survival and perpetuation of the species.
So can morality exist without humanity? If there's a society, it will. Can altruism/goodness/etc. exist without humanity? Of course.