Epic DR vs Paladin Smite-What say you?


Rules Questions

1 to 50 of 57 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

If a Paladin uses Smite Evil does it bypass even DR/Epic? I'm struggling with the idea that a say, a 5th level Paladin can smite a level 10/5 mythic Fighter due to Smite Evil with a +1 sword and bypass all DR.

NOTE: The Mythic rules are the latter rules.

DR/Epic

A type of damage reduction, DR/epic can be overcome only by a weapon with an enhancement bonus of +6 or greater. Weapons with special abilities also count as epic for the purposes of overcoming damage reduction if the total bonus value of all of their abilities (including the enhancement bonus) is +6 or greater.

Smite Evil (Su)

Once per day, a paladin can call out to the powers of good to aid her in her struggle against evil. As a swift action, the paladin chooses one target within sight to smite. If this target is evil, the paladin adds her Cha bonus (if any) to her attack rolls and adds her paladin level to all damage rolls made against the target of her smite. If the target of smite evil is an outsider with the evil subtype, an evil-aligned dragon, or an undead creature, the bonus to damage on the first successful attack increases to 2 points of damage per level the paladin possesses. Regardless of the target, smite evil attacks automatically bypass any DR the creature might possess.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I hate to say it, but if you're throwing 10/5 Mythic Fighters at your Paladin, who has zero Mythic tiers, and is only half of his base level, you must really hate him, the class he plays, as well as any Paladin in your game. (It's also not that bad, since Fighters can get feats later down the road that helps accomplish this; though it's universal they aren't nearly as good as bypassing every kind of DR they have). That being said, if you don't allow it to work, you're ignoring the RAW (any means any; remember this thread and your viewpoint here? Same application), and it's just downright cruel in your attempts to kill the Paladin. (Quite frankly, it would be more civil to just have a Rocks Fall, Everyone Dies effect put on the Paladin, as well as every other Paladin in your game.)

And if the Fighter isn't Evil, that Smite won't work, ergo no DR bypass. You could be smart and throw in other lines of defense, such as making him have Ghost Touch equipment with an Incorporeal effect, meaning even if he does Smite, he still isn't accomplishing too much.

There's also an armor property that allows you to shrug off a Smite effect 1/day, which can be replenished by using up a Smite charge; but the 1/day thing should be more than enough, since he still has to waste Smite charges and Swift Actions (which could be used to heal instead) to get Smite benefits.

There are several ways to counteract/reduce Smite and its benefits/applications. Ignoring them as well as the RAW of the Smite ability calls into question whether the concern is actually with the rules or with you not able to handle the powerscale of Paladins.


I believe the damage bypassing is the additional gained from Paladin levels only(like elemental damage), the weapon it's self might not bypass unless it is a +6 or greater value, even if used against an Evil opponent(assuming aligned weapons = +5 listing, CRB pg. 562). Bane weapons enhancement can also meet the +6 or greater requirement.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

7 people marked this as a favorite.

Be aware that even before Mythic came on the scene, there already existed DR/- which no type of weapon can overcome. DR/- is actually more powerful than DR/epic. And with that already in the game, Smite Evil was given the ability to bypass all DR.


Indeed, DR/- is more powerful than DR/epic and smite still flat out bypasses it.


Smite > DR/Epic


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber

Personally, I don't allow it, since Paladins already trivialize a lot of encounters. Of course everybody can have their own opinions, which are equally valid as mine.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

13 people marked this as a favorite.
magnuskn wrote:
Personally, I don't allow it

Great! There's a whole forum for that.

However, it's not this one.


Smite is the "easy button" for overcoming DR, so yes, it wins. If in doubt, it wins.
Many of us house rule it differently, but as mentioned directly above, it's a house rule, not an official one.

-TimD


Any DR the creature might possess is ANY DR the creature might possess.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

By RAW, Smite Evil overcomes any DR. As I understand it, RAI should be the same. If anyone would disallow that, it would only be fair to inform a paladin player before.

And yes, I had too easy encounters because of that. I still allowed it (I was the GM).


I don't think it's by RAW. I think there's a discrepancy in the RAW.

...only by a weapon with an enhancement bonus of +6 or greater...

Regardless of the target, smite evil attacks automatically bypass any DR the creature might possess.

Both those abilities seem to be at odds. None of the DR types include the word only in their descriptions. Nor is that in the general listing for DR. And there doesn't appear to be an order of preference.

If they didn't want to restrict Paladin's ability, they could just delete the word only. It's not like it's needed for the rest of the description. In fact, in another section, they describe that creatures with DR/Epic can overcome DR/Epic with their own natural attacks. So it's wrong anyway to have the word only in there if it's not the only way.


The paladin's Smite Evil ability means what it says: Bypass all DR.

That's how I'll play it at my table, at least.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

3 people marked this as a favorite.
TyrKnight wrote:

I don't think it's by RAW. I think there's a discrepancy in the RAW.

...only by a weapon with an enhancement bonus of +6 or greater...

Regardless of the target, smite evil attacks automatically bypass any DR the creature might possess.

Both those abilities seem to be at odds. None of the DR types include the word only in their descriptions. Nor is that in the general listing for DR. And there doesn't appear to be an order of preference.

If they didn't want to restrict Paladin's ability, they could just delete the word only. It's not like it's needed for the rest of the description. In fact, in another section, they describe that creatures with DR/Epic can overcome DR/Epic with their own natural attacks. So it's wrong anyway to have the word only in there if it's not the only way.

Core Rulebook, Damage Reduction wrote:
For example, DR 5/magic means that a creature takes 5 less points of damage from all weapons that are not magic.

Please don't try to argue that "only" is somehow more absolute than "all".


So you've proved that another one is poorly written too. Congratulations. Two of them are worded badly. And which one is the most recent released book and should be worded correctly. The point remains that they could clarify this by taking out one word.

I love the condescension though. Keep that up.


TyrKnight wrote:

So you've proved that another one is poorly written too. Congratulations. Two of them are worded badly. And which one is the most recent released book and should be worded correctly. The point remains that they could clarify this by taking out one word.

I love the condescension though. Keep that up.

Not poorly written. Both of those examples are simply a case of stating the base rule. Smite evil is a specific rule that overrides the base rules in regards to DR.


Well DR/Epic came out in the Bestiary which was released right after Core Rulebook long before Mythic came out.

So if Paladin (Or Anti-paladin in the case of a Solar) smite worked to overcome DR then, why would it not work now?


Smite evil works great for bypassing DR/Epic right up to the point when you encounter that evil enemy that has corruption resistance.

In my Wrath of Righteous game Smite Good has been useful Impervious Body which is DR 5,10,or 15/Epic. Of course my players answer to the was Corruption Resistance but as Assimar he can only do that 1/day. It was good investment for, I told him that might come in useful when said he thought that was stupid alternative to the Daylight spell.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

2 people marked this as a favorite.
TyrKnight wrote:

So you've proved that another one is poorly written too. Congratulations. Two of them are worded badly. And which one is the most recent released book and should be worded correctly. The point remains that they could clarify this by taking out one word.

I love the condescension though. Keep that up.

I think you misunderstood my post.

You had made the case that since DR/epic said "only" and none of the other DR types said "only", that it could potentially be inferred that it functions differently than the standard DR rules.

I then showed that when the Core Rulebook defines how DR works, it uses the equivalently-absolute term "all". Thus, the element of your argument that I italicized above is incorrect. The only way you could claim that DR/epic worked any differently than other DR is if you claimed that "only" and "all" were on different tiers (some people would try to make that claim, so I tried to preempt it, because I don't know you from Adam).

Since we now know that DR/epic works just like other DR, and we know that Smite Evil can bypass that other DR, the final conclusion is crystal clear.


Two errors in wording doesn't make a right. It's still very poorly worded. Which they COULD fix just by removing one word. But I'm sure whoever wrote that thinks the word "only" sounded cool.

Grand Lodge RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.
TyrKnight wrote:
Two errors in wording doesn't make a right. It's still very poorly worded.

What exactly is poorly worded? Everything looks consistent with normal rules language to me.


Ughbash wrote:

Well DR/Epic came out in the Bestiary which was released right after Core Rulebook long before Mythic came out.

So if Paladin (Or Anti-paladin in the case of a Solar) smite worked to overcome DR then, why would it not work now?

They were released concurrently. The CRB and Bestiary 1 together form the core of what Pathfinder is.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

+1 to what Jiggy posted.

Also: Posted by Jason Bulmahn.

As I have not yet seen an update/errata on this issue I'd assume the question is answered.
Just remember the target has to be evil, too.

Ruyan.

Grand Lodge

Monkplayer wrote:

If a Paladin uses Smite Evil does it bypass even DR/Epic? I'm struggling with the idea that a say, a 5th level Paladin can smite a level 10/5 mythic Fighter due to Smite Evil with a +1 sword and bypass all DR.

So what? the 10/5 Fighter is still going to turn him into paste in one shot, which in all likelihood he'll get before the Paladin even gets to declare his smite. You're looking for a solution to a non-existent problem.


LazarX wrote:
Monkplayer wrote:

If a Paladin uses Smite Evil does it bypass even DR/Epic? I'm struggling with the idea that a say, a 5th level Paladin can smite a level 10/5 mythic Fighter due to Smite Evil with a +1 sword and bypass all DR.

So what? the 10/5 Fighter is still going to turn him into paste in one shot, which in all likelihood he'll get before the Paladin even gets to declare his smite. You're looking for a solution to a non-existent problem.

This. Have you even seen the stuff a 10th-level fighter can do with five mythic tiers? The paladin had better be an archer acting on the surprise round, or he'll be lucky to even get his weapon out before becoming another footnote in the Chronicles of Rip Steakface.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

If it bothers your sensibilities, understand that it's not so much the paladin who's bypassing DR/epic, but the power of his god that bypasses it.


I believe the added Damage of Smite Bypasses, but the weapon it's self still can meet resistance, lumping it all or nothing will cause problems.


Scrapper wrote:
I believe the damage bypassing is the additional gained from Paladin levels only(like elemental damage), the weapon it's self might not bypass unless it is a +6 or greater value, even if used against an Evil opponent(assuming aligned weapons = +5 listing, CRB pg. 562). Bane weapons enhancement can also meet the +6 or greater requirement.

It's the attack, not the bonus damage.

"Regardless of the target, smite evil attacks automatically bypass any DR the creature might possess."

Emphasis mine, but the wording is unambiguous. The entire attack is a "smite evil attack".


RAW and RAI is CRYSTAL CLEAR!
Smite evil bypasses any damage reduction and it is the entire attack. Don't believe me? Take it up with Jason Bulmahn.
Whether or not you actually think it is fair or is how it should work is irrelevant when discussing raw.
Personally speaking I think I'd houserule smite evil to not pierce epic damage reduction, but I would never claim that it was RAW.

Silver Crusade RPG Superstar 2014 Top 16

Thomas Long 175 wrote:
Indeed, DR/- is more powerful than DR/epic and smite still flat out bypasses it.

I'm still a fan of this point.

Also, I'm squarely with Jiggy on this, smite evil bypasses ALL DR.


I don't even see why people find this at all surprising. Bypassing DR is not an instant win, it's just a way to level the playing field a bit.


In my opinion DR for NPCs/monsters is useless if you play Mythic or use the DR errata.


TyrKnight wrote:
Two errors in wording doesn't make a right. It's still very poorly worded. Which they COULD fix just by removing one word. But I'm sure whoever wrote that thinks the word "only" sounded cool.

It's not really poorly-worded, though. DR is bypassed by weapons. All the stuff about how you bypass specific DR will be framed in terms of weapon types or qualities, such as slashing/piercing, magic, epic, or good. Smite Evil, lantern archon attacks, and some mythic powers bypass all forms of DR, and that overrides the usual requirements for bypassing the DR. This is pretty consistent.

Grand Lodge

Like I've said before 10/5 fighter vs a Paladin 5 is a non issue. It's even more of a non issue if either of the conditions below apply.

1. The fighter is not evil. This means that Smite evil does absolutely nothing here.

2. The Fighter is evil but has taken the power Beyond Alignment. Same result as 1 above.

3. Even if 1 and 2 aren't true, the 10/5 fighter unless he is being run by the worlds greatest alzheimic idiot who's putting most of his senile attention on reruns of Charlie's Angels, is still going to make paste of the Paladin in one round, most likely in even less time than that.


The DR bypass applies "regardless of the target", though.

51 to 57 of 57 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Epic DR vs Paladin Smite-What say you? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.