
insaneogeddon |
The separate some types of cats and tigers/lions
Yet they group them under animal companions under (cats)
They group dolphins and orcas
etc they seem to arbitrarily group or not group things with no care for a pattern (kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species)
Worse is then when creatures are mentioned in class entries their listed in a way that does not direct you how to find them (animals like weird mega-fauna and dinosaurs etc are listed as name for mount options or companion options NOT as their designation).
So basically players looking for their animal companion/mount options need to peruse the entire monster manual, never mind DMs searching for monsters listed in paizo modules OR use the d20 site or some free downloaded books and do document searches.
Either way its anti-book buying which seems an unusual business strategy.

Ellis Mirari |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |

Ellis Mirari wrote:There's a thing in books called an "index"...I'd consider it poor organization if you had to use the index every time you open the book.
I'm having flashbacks now to the core rule book for Exalted now... whoever organized that garbage is a degenerate who belongs on a cross.
I agree it would be poor organization if that WERE the case... but I really don't see any problem here at all. There's an purely alphabetical listing of monsters in the front of the book (Aurochs in A's and Bison in B's) that also includes the parenthetical, if there is one (herd animal), that will let you look at similar creatures next to eachother instead of hunding all over the book, such as the different types of Dragons.
So, in short, the Bestiary is both consistant and alphabetical, and I have no idea what this person is complaining about.

Kobold Catgirl |

Ellis Mirari wrote:There's a thing in books called an "index"...I'd consider it poor organization if you had to use the index every time you open the book.
I'm having flashbacks now to the core rule book for Exalted now... whoever organized that garbage is a degenerate who belongs on a cross.
You really find it that hard to remember that the two types of dolphin are on the same page?

Valantrix1 |

The only reason the types of monsters you list are grouped that way, is to save space. If you notice each of those you have listed only take up half of a page. To put them in “order” as you have suggested would not be a good business model if you are trying to save on printing costs. Also, as others have stated, there is a list in the front and back of the book to look up specific creatures.

chaoseffect |

chaoseffect wrote:You really find it that hard to remember that the two types of dolphin are on the same page?Ellis Mirari wrote:There's a thing in books called an "index"...I'd consider it poor organization if you had to use the index every time you open the book.
I'm having flashbacks now to the core rule book for Exalted now... whoever organized that garbage is a degenerate who belongs on a cross.
I really have no opinion on the organization of the bestiaries as I never use hard copy versions besides looking at the pretty pictures randomly. I was mostly replying to the idea that having an index solves illogical organization issues (which I have no opinion on whether or not the bestiaries have).

Liam Warner |
Look on the bright side I just had to update my wiring rules and whoever was in charge of that amendment of changes was an utter moron. It contained such brillianace as . . .
Delete the sentence "43254 Cabling, control systems and inspection of fire safety mechanisms - fire" and replace it with "43254 Cabling, control systems and inspection of fire safety mechanisms." You'd think it be easier to say in the clause 43254 delete the word fire at the end of the sentence but nooooo. Then there were at least two paragraphs that were deleted to add the letters NZS to the standard applied so it became AS/NZS instead of just AS.

chaoseffect |

I dunno, that's kinda what an Index (or TOC) is for--navigation. The Bestiaries generally have such quality organization that they're unnecessary, is the problem, meaning that we aren't accustomed to ever needing them. So the few times it does come up, it becomes this whole big thing.
Disregarding the quality of the organization in the bestiaries, which I have no opinion on, I see the first part of your quote as saying, "Well the car has airbags, that's what they're for. Why design to try to prevent the crash?" That shit should be a last resort >_<
...once again I'm saying all of this with Exalted's core rule book in mind, as opposed to any particular Paizo product. But I think the point still stands.

![]() |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |

The table of contents and index should be a last resort?
If you're opening a text book, glancing at my shelf, I see Surveying: Theory and Practice 7th Edition (a 1400 page book about Land Surveying). I need to look up the formulas for a circular curve, and I don't know the exact spot in the book; where do I find it out?
Opening the cover, I find the TOC on p.ix, and scrolling for a minute, on p.xxiv I see that Geometry of the Circular Curve is in chapter 16.5 and on p.847. Alternatively, I could have opened the rear cover to the Index, and in less than fifteen seconds, I find the entry for Circular Curves, 844-848.
Both methods help me isolate content within the volume, and, as demonstrated, are first resorts to locating the information in lieu of a search box or searchable pdf.

Te'Shen |

The table of contents and index should be a last resort?
. . .
Both methods help me isolate content within the volume, and, as demonstrated, are first resorts to locating the information in lieu of a search box or searchable pdf.
Agreed. I am starting to wonder if its the fact that the individual favors the almost immediate gratification of having electronics do the work for her/him rather than spend some extra seconds reading something s/he didn't intend to read.
Which in turn activates my inner old man on a porch, voiced by Waldorf and Statler, descrying the potential loss of literacy and patience (which is really odd now that I think about it... Waldorf and Statler just mocked things... every things... any things...).
To chaoseffect: White Wolf just had wretched editing across multiple game lines. There were times when the table of contents and the index were bad (if they even had an index, which was more likely it was just a few words pretending to be an index...).

![]() |

My only complaint with the bestiaries is something that happens occasionally with the variants.
I flipped through one of the bestiaries going crazy trying to find a 'Skaveling' as it showed up on the list of undead at the back.
On a later look through I found it under the bat entry. Since its an undead bat.
Just a minor problem though.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

My minor complaints aside, I want to reaffirm that I have a deep and abiding appreciation for Paizo's organizational skills, the fact their indices actually reference the right locations, their table of contents are accurate and so on.
This may sound like damning by faint praise, but anybody who's ever had to muddle through FASA books of yesteryear (and notice that FASA of yesteryear is gone), know the nightmare of poor organization in rules books.

Craig Bonham 141 |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I agree it would be poor organization if that WERE the case... but I really don't see any problem here at all. There's an purely alphabetical listing of monsters in the front of the book (Aurochs in A's and Bison in B's) that also includes the parenthetical, if there is one (herd animal), that will let you look at similar creatures next to eachother instead of hunding all over the book, such as the different types of Dragons.So, in short, the Bestiary is both consistant and alphabetical, and I have no idea what this person is complaining about.
Totes magotes.