Miniatures - do we need 45% to be female?


Miniatures

1 to 50 of 212 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>
Scarab Sages

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Just an observation and probably mentioned before that many of the character classes I would like to see from reaper for pathfinder are female character based when I would prefer a male version of them as well. Since a majority of gamers are male who don't tend to play female characters, can we get a male paladin, cleric, etc to buy instead of the female version I won't be playing and won't need to buy?
That goes for the metal reaper as well as the new painted plastic minis.

Thanks!


12 people marked this as a favorite.

Let's...not. I get where you're coming from, but D&D has always had this male focus and, for once, we have a pretty inclusive and diverse playing system/setting that is more inclusive to women (and other groups). If it were all male, with a bunch of male characters, it would probably put some aspiring women gamers off. It's better this way, trust me.

Silver Crusade

4 people marked this as a favorite.

I know loads of male players who play female characters plus as a GM I can't find enough female prepainted minis to represent NPC's.

Not a problem IMO.


This should be an interesting thread. ~.~

Random anecdote: Our group is 3 guys and 3 girls, occasionally 4 guys and 4 girls. With the GM usually (but not always) one of the guys, there's often more female players.

Silver Crusade

19 people marked this as a favorite.

45%? No.

50%? Yes.


Is the argument that there are too many female miniatures and we should have more male miniatures?

I just can't get behind that argument...


9 people marked this as a favorite.

Half the population should reasonably mean half the representation.

And, the females need to be WEARING CLOTHES. Or actual, for reals, functional armor that protects them in combat. Anyone who is running around a dungeon or the wilderness in lingerie and a couple of soda pop-top rings fighting monsters will be dead much too fast to be represented by a mini.

Need some naked figures because your battlemap is for some reason being drawn in a brothel or at an orgy party? Okay, cool, if all your players are adults. But if your scenario does not happen to be set in a brothel, the female characters should not be dressed as if it were. Because that is seriously stupid.

Dark Archive Contributor

22 people marked this as a favorite.

Ral Partha used to produce miniatures in pairs, one male, one female. That was excellent, especially when you put on a belt before casting identify.


Heh, who says magical armor has to be "practical"? Heck a simple bit of metal on a bicep provides armor protection. I've got no problem with magic bra and panties protecting the whole body.

It's magic!

Paizo Employee Creative Director

9 people marked this as a favorite.
Xzaral wrote:

45%? No.

50%? Yes.

This gets my vote. Since that's the philosophy we used for our Iconic Adventurers our deities (although the presence of aesexual and hermaphroditic deities confuses that split a bit, of course...).


2 people marked this as a favorite.

i dont see a problem with this "i want a male mini for my paladin character who happens to be male" situation

he's not saying there should be less female characters/minis
he's saying he wants more males so he doesnt have to represent himself with a female mini

the best solution is to make more of both sexes for each class
more products = more $$$


I don't know about you, but I want to be able to play the same mini before and after I get magic armor. And if I were to play a female character I'd want to have the option of playing one with a sense of modesty. Or at least the sense to keep warm or keep the sun off depending on the environment. There are very few environments where clothing is not beneficial for one reason or the other. I think just tropical forests.


master_marshmallow wrote:

i dont see a problem with this "i want a male mini for my paladin character who happens to be male" situation

he's not saying there should be less female characters/minis
he's saying he wants more males so he doesnt have to represent himself with a female mini

the best solution is to make more of both sexes for each class
more products = more $$$

Hmm... somehow I think my economics professor might introduce the concept of "what the market will bear" into this conversation about now...


1 person marked this as a favorite.

It would be better to phrase the idea as:

Please make at least a male and female option for race/class combinations. Some may just fill as.....say robed caster for wiz/sorc's, but yes, I would like to see a larger range to them as well. I'm personally grateful for the advent of plastic mini's, but tired of DnD's habit of just pulling from their book art, and reaaaally getting sick of Wizkids yanking our chains by constantly processing repaints and passing them off as new.

I would like a to see a dedicated range of idealists and artists focused on crafting with specific representations in mind. and more than that, several variations on the same combinations. such as the afore stated 'practical' and 'impractical' armor designs. I happen to know some ladies who really enjoy their bikini chainmail.

With the titanic pile of monsters, characters, props and oddness to choose from, why is it so hard to pick a single theme and stick with it. With businesses like reaper, they could draw people back to their product with a much closer representation of their character than making do with the Kyra iconic (not knocking it, just not good to be the only scimitar-wielding mini readily available to a guy).


Atarlost wrote:
I don't know about you, but I want to be able to play the same mini before and after I get magic armor. And if I were to play a female character I'd want to have the option of playing one with a sense of modesty. Or at least the sense to keep warm or keep the sun off depending on the environment. There are very few environments where clothing is not beneficial for one reason or the other. I think just tropical forests.

But.... Dragons!!!

Your argument is invalid. ;-)

Scarab Sages

master_marshmallow wrote:

i dont see a problem with this "i want a male mini for my paladin character who happens to be male" situation

he's not saying there should be less female characters/minis
he's saying he wants more males so he doesnt have to represent himself with a female mini

the best solution is to make more of both sexes for each class
more products = more $$$

Master marshmallow better stated my intentions, can I get a male version of the classes, not that I meant for reaper to not make female versions.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I can't find a miniature for a male character.
.
.
.
HAHAHA!

Please.

There are plenty of companies that make miniatures, do a little searching, you'll find one. And you can have an armored male character and call it a paladin. You don't need some company to sell you a "male paladin".


Finding a good model for some characters is very difficult buuuut alternatively you can just arts and crafts a bit and put one together out of parts. This is how I made the lizardman-centaur that our GM has as a player race in our current game.

Does it require a bit of labor? Sure. But it's the best way to get the model you want in the race and sex you want.


7 people marked this as a favorite.

my group actually uses legos so we can customize our minis

and also because its fun to play with legos


This is a very flame bait sounding title (and first post), whether you meant it to be or not.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Adamantine Dragon wrote:
Atarlost wrote:
I don't know about you, but I want to be able to play the same mini before and after I get magic armor. And if I were to play a female character I'd want to have the option of playing one with a sense of modesty. Or at least the sense to keep warm or keep the sun off depending on the environment. There are very few environments where clothing is not beneficial for one reason or the other. I think just tropical forests.

But.... Dragons!!!

Your argument is invalid. ;-)

Ah I should have known. Dragons are the ones forcing all sorceresses to dress like succubi. I always wondered why we needed to go around killing them. They're hoarding all the modest clothes!


1 person marked this as a favorite.

actually the dragons are all just perverted
basically every dragon is jaba the hut


Atarlost wrote:
I don't know about you, but I want to be able to play the same mini before and after I get magic armor. And if I were to play a female character I'd want to have the option of playing one with a sense of modesty. Or at least the sense to keep warm or keep the sun off depending on the environment. There are very few environments where clothing is not beneficial for one reason or the other. I think just tropical forests.

It has nothing particularly to do with modesty. It has to do with *not being stupid*, or not being portrayed as stupid, or as strictly ornamental and totally ineffective as an actual fighter.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

So, let me get this straight... You think that the miniature companies are creating too few male miniatures and too many female mostly naked miniatures because their market is mostly young single guys? Guys who are notorious for having a lack of inter-gender experience?

Does it occur to you that they know their market?


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Adamantine Dragon wrote:

So, let me get this straight... You think that the miniature companies are creating too few male miniatures and too many female mostly naked miniatures because their market is mostly young single guys? Guys who are notorious for having a lack of inter-gender experience?

Does it occur to you that they know their market?

They can cater to the stereotyped 'socially awkward male virgin with no social skills who uses fantasy games as his only sexual outlet' market, or they can actively work to expand their market to people who don't fit those old, bad stereotypes.

In general Paizo has been trying for the latter, and that is a good thing.


TanithT wrote:
Adamantine Dragon wrote:

So, let me get this straight... You think that the miniature companies are creating too few male miniatures and too many female mostly naked miniatures because their market is mostly young single guys? Guys who are notorious for having a lack of inter-gender experience?

Does it occur to you that they know their market?

They can cater to the stereotyped 'socially awkward male virgin with no social skills who uses fantasy games as his only sexual outlet' market, or they can actively work to expand their market to people who don't fit those old, bad stereotypes.

In general Paizo has been trying for the latter, and that is a good thing.

Well then, I guess you've got all the male miniatures you need then. Problem solved.

Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I don't agree with this, because even if most of your players are male, it doesn't mean that you won't need female miniatures for NPCs. A game world should not be more than 55% male, after all, or then you're bound to run into mating issues. 0_0

That said, what I want to see is racial diversity in Pathfinder and other companies. Now we're starting to see the ladies, but models are still very much Humans vs. Monsters. If you look at Rise of the Runelords as an example, almost every PC race miniature in that set is a human; I think there's one elf and Harsk. Likewise Shattered Star has Lem, a drow, and a catfolk rogue. (Who happens to be female. Hooray!) I get that Golarion is a human-centric setting, but players almost NEVER fall into those rules. Players play what they what to play, and when miniatures companies don't help the players out with that, it leads to the Halfling Effect, where there simply is not a decent variety of Halflings who aren't Lem the Bard; as awesome as Lem is, he needs some diverse friends to free from slavery and stuff, not just Lem clones.

I'd love to see more gnomes, more halflings, and models for some of the more unusual Featured and Uncommon races from the Advanced Race Guide from both Reaper Miniatures and WizKids.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I use mostly male figures, so I buy and paint mostly males figures. Maybe I'm regressed for imagining my fantasy worlds full of men killing each other. On the other hand my female figures are almost always fun to paint because its out of the norm for me. I've only played one female character for an extended period of time and I painted three figures to represent her, cause you know... different colored dresses.

RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

Xzaral wrote:

45%? No.

50%? Yes.

I disagree. This percentage of female models is not nearly high enough. :)


Kohl McClash wrote:

Just an observation and probably mentioned before that many of the character classes I would like to see from reaper for pathfinder are female character based when I would prefer a male version of them as well. Since a majority of gamers are male who don't tend to play female characters, can we get a male paladin, cleric, etc to buy instead of the female version I won't be playing and won't need to buy?

That goes for the metal reaper as well as the new painted plastic minis.

Thanks!

Your experience is not universal. Quit acting like it is, and quit dismissing women's involvement in gaming.

Thanks!

Silver Crusade

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I guess that the OP's post should slammed hard in the faces of "there are no problem with women being under-represented in the hobby" people over in the Sexism thread.


sexism isnt the problem tho, he just wants a male mini for his paladin types and sorcerer types, since all he has to choose from are either for different classes or are female figures

its not an attack on women existing in game, its about wanting both for each class

RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

master_marshmallow wrote:

sexism isnt the problem tho, he just wants a male mini for his paladin types and sorcerer types, since all he has to choose from are either for different classes or are female figures

its not an attack on women existing in game, its about wanting both for each class

If that is true, then the OP needs to think a little more carefully about how he says what he means. :(

Forum posts can be amazingly easy to misinterpret.


master_marshmallow wrote:

sexism isnt the problem tho, he just wants a male mini for his paladin types and sorcerer types, since all he has to choose from are either for different classes or are female figures

its not an attack on women existing in game, its about wanting both for each class

Actually, you are wrong. Asking for those "instead of" (exact words) females, because gamers are male, and don't play females is sexist. Period.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.

If getting more female minis in randomised packs is the 'price' I have to pay to get more women involved in gaming then I'm more than willing to pay that price. If you aren't willing to help shoulder that 'burden', then your best bet is to buy non-randomized minis or resell the female minis in your sets.

Women have been dealing with playing wrong sex miniatures for years and have a tougher time finding appropriate minis.


RadiantSophia wrote:
Actually, you are wrong. Asking for those "instead of" (exact words) females, because gamers are male, and don't play females is sexist. Period.

You know I wasn't going to chime in. But I love it when someone puts period at the end of their statement!

"I said period at the end. That automatically makes me right and ends the discussion. hehehehe"


5 people marked this as a favorite.

There are plenty of female models out there.

Now, try finding a fat female model. Seriously, there are like two.

You can find a ton of cheesecake models out there. Finding ones that look like serious adventurers rather than strippers can be a hassle. even a lot of the Reaper models have the 'naked' tag in them. And then you have places like Hasslefree and Brother Vinni - gloriously sculpted, often naked. Sometimes disturbingly naked.

Once you clear out the ones in boob armour to no armour (or clothes)you've drastically reduced the number of suitable female models out there. The same is, not shockingly, not true for male models...while you can find nude male models it's a lot harder.

While I do a lot of converting and even assembling models out of parts to get the models I want, finding something like a male paladin is stupidly easy. Any suitably armed model with the right kind of armour works. Just because it's labled as a cleric or fighter doesn't mean it has to be.


Thomas Long 175 wrote:
RadiantSophia wrote:
Actually, you are wrong. Asking for those "instead of" (exact words) females, because gamers are male, and don't play females is sexist. Period.

You know I wasn't going to chime in. But I love it when someone puts period at the end of their statement!

"I said period at the end. That automatically makes me right and ends the discussion. hehehehe"

This actually reminds me of why I love Spanish. I can see the exclamation point at the beginning of the sentence, allowing me to mentally put the proper inflection of surprise from the beginning, not end. Makes reading posts so weird in my head. I read your post deadpan until i got to "statement" :)

JonGarrett wrote:

There are plenty of female models out there.

Now, try finding a fat female model. Seriously, there are like two.

You can find a ton of cheesecake models out there. Finding ones that look like serious adventurers rather than strippers can be a hassle. even a lot of the Reaper models have the 'naked' tag in them. And then you have places like Hasslefree and Brother Vinni - gloriously sculpted, often naked. Sometimes disturbingly naked.

Once you clear out the ones in boob armour to no armour (or clothes)you've drastically reduced the number of suitable female models out there. The same is, not shockingly, not true for male models...while you can find nude male models it's a lot harder.

While I do a lot of converting and even assembling models out of parts to get the models I want, finding something like a male paladin is stupidly easy. Any suitably armed model with the right kind of armour works. Just because it's labled as a cleric or fighter doesn't mean it has to be.

Yeah, I actually have a male cleric that I easily use as a paladin.


Kohl McClash wrote:

Just an observation and probably mentioned before that many of the character classes I would like to see from reaper for pathfinder are female character based when I would prefer a male version of them as well. Since a majority of gamers are male who don't tend to play female characters, can we get a male paladin, cleric, etc to buy instead of the female version I won't be playing and won't need to buy?

That goes for the metal reaper as well as the new painted plastic minis.

Thanks!

Any numbers to back up these assumptions? I don't too many male gamers who only play male characters, and the number of women I see at gaming tables has been steadily rising. I see no reason to discontinue female minis. The iconic paladin and cleric are female, but both Reaper and Paizo have dozens of minis that are appropriate for male paladins/clerics, so I really don't see any substance to this complaint.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

O.k., then the other way to read this is as a female-bodied gamer, I should not be catered to, while males are. Is this what is being asked? If so, that is even more sexist.


RadiantSophia wrote:
O.k., then the other way to read this is as a female-bodied gamer, I should not be catered to, while males are. Is this what is being asked? If so, that is even more sexist.

no that's not what is being asked. from what I understand the op wants to be able to choose a male representative of a class where they have only found a female version of it. He is not asking for a stop to the printing of female models, only for an alternative option.


But the great thing is there seems to be a great deal more miniatures going into production. Of course, this might saturate the market - however it should allow a greater choice. And it should allow for more niche markets (talking races, not sexes) to have mini's available.

For example, Stonehaven have just funded 2 different KS's (dwarves & gnomes) with plans for more. The line of mini's produced by paizo is rapidly expanding.

The best way to ensure the mini's you want are produced is with your wallet.

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

YE GODS I thought we already HAD a feminism/sexism thread going on at the moment... is this the newest Paladin Alignment / Fighters Suck Wizards Rule / Monk Angst theme?


It appears so. I'd much prefer lots of cheap, good quality, available mini's.

The Exchange

1 person marked this as a favorite.

If the op goes to the reaper web sight and uses the figure finder there, he'll find a huge number of miniatures to suit his needs. I think what he's done is only look at the range for the Pathfinder minis that Reaper produces. Reaper mostly moulds minis on easily identifiable characters from the APs or other books. If he looks outside the"Pathfinder" microcosm there, he'll be fine.

As to the sexism of minis. I'll admit there are many models out there that are rather scantily clad, however reaper hav a pretty good representation of sensibly dressed women folk as well. Again, the figure finder is your friend. They also have a number of women working for them, both painters and sculptors, as well as other parts of the company.

I've found the barbarian and sorceress types to be the most scantily clad. Probably a holdover from all thos Boris Valejo days in the industry.

Cheers


Ishmell wrote:
RadiantSophia wrote:
O.k., then the other way to read this is as a female-bodied gamer, I should not be catered to, while males are. Is this what is being asked? If so, that is even more sexist.
no that's not what is being asked. from what I understand the op wants to be able to choose a male representative of a class where they have only found a female version of it. He is not asking for a stop to the printing of female models, only for an alternative option.

"Instead of the female version" sounds like asking to stop producing the female versions. I'm not sure how instead of means in addition to.


JonGarrett wrote:

There are plenty of female models out there.

Now, try finding a fat female model. Seriously, there are like two.

Try finding a fat male model. Occasionally you get a fat zombie type, but you are lucky to find any fat models out there at all.


There are plenty of female humans but try finding female versions of Halfing, Gnome or Dwarf classes, it's really hard. The Skull and Shackles AP has about 50% female crew some are demi-humans, finding a mini for Rosie or Tilly is next to impossible lol.


*Shrug*

And I want a half-orc paladin. Oh well. There will always be more possible characters than figures to represent them.


RadiantSophia wrote:
Ishmell wrote:
RadiantSophia wrote:
O.k., then the other way to read this is as a female-bodied gamer, I should not be catered to, while males are. Is this what is being asked? If so, that is even more sexist.
no that's not what is being asked. from what I understand the op wants to be able to choose a male representative of a class where they have only found a female version of it. He is not asking for a stop to the printing of female models, only for an alternative option.
"Instead of the female version" sounds like asking to stop producing the female versions. I'm not sure how instead of means in addition to.

And if you read half a page down the OP clarifies it by confirming master marshmallows interpretation

1 to 50 of 212 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Paizo / Licensed Products / Miniatures / Miniatures - do we need 45% to be female? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.