
prometheus's_curse |

So here is the deal I want to be able to tell my DM how natural attacks work for a druid. For the sake this goal I am going to use a form that my character does not have knowledge of and a level that I am currently not.
(animals actual template)
Dire Lion (L):
Melee bite +12 (1d8+7 plus grab), 2 claws +13 (1d6+7)
Space 10 ft.; Reach 5 ft.
Special Attacks pounce, rake (2 claws +13, 1d6+7)
Lets say my Str.=22 while in this form and my BAB is +9(/+4) and I am using greater magic fang +3 attack rolls(level 12-13). Tell me if the following is correct if I am in a position to pounce/do full attacks action.
Melee: bite +17 (1d8+6str.+grab), claw +17 (1d6+6str.), claw +17 (1d6+6str.), [pounce] claw +17 (1d6+6), claw +17 (1d6+6)=w/e the total comes out to
The animal its self treats the attacks as primaries so I am assuming I do as well, but i have seen the pounce be treated as a secondary. Also as I understand it the extra BAB does nothing.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Not quite, you'd get something more like this.
Melee: [pounce] -> bite +17 (1d8+6str.+grab), claw +17 (1d6+6str.), claw +17 (1d6+6str.), Rake +13, 1d6+6, Rake +13, 1d6+6
The following round if you din't maintan the grapple you'd just get
bite +17 (1d8+6str.+grab), claw +17 (1d6+6str.), claw +17 (1d6+6str.)
And yes it is extremely nasty to use.

Gauss |

Of course, if you did maintain the grapple and chose the damage option then you get automatic damage with the bodypart doing the maintaining (bite is the hopeful one here) and then 2 rake attacks (roll the attacks normally). Maintaining has a +9 bonus to the CMD. This is usually superior to the normal attack sequence.
- Gauss