Ninjitsu Punch is So Slow - I Don't Get It


Off-Topic Discussions

1 to 50 of 60 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

So, I just took my first Ninjitsu class and I wanted to talk to the brain trust about my experience with it, given the vast amount of fighting knowledge we oddly have here.

The first thing we were shown is this punch, about which I have some strong negative feelings but am trying to reserve judgement, where you push off with your back leg and try to spear the target on a stiff arm.

Fighting stance is with the front foot pointed forward, back foot pointed out 90 degrees, and "hands up" being much lower than what boxers consider hands up, shoulders purposefully relaxed (not covering the neck or jaw at all). You push off with the back leg but keep the back foot planted, which widens your stance. Your hand comes out a little, with elbow down and slightly bend, fist vertical. The arm doesn't move during the punch. There is an active attempt to keep it fixed and rigid through the whole hit. Afterwards, you relax and step up, ready to do it again.

Skipping all of the obvious criticism about how they don't spar and are probably vulnerable to being punched in the face, my issue is really just how weak this punch is.

Force = Mass * Acceleration, or specifically, how much and how quickly your fist decelerates after you hit something with it. The faster your hand is going, the more opportunity for a strong deceleration there will be: Momentum = Mass * Velocity.

Mass is something we can't do a whole lot about, at least in terms of how big a person is. The thing we can control is how much mass is involved in the impact. That's why punching with your whole body is stronger than just pushing out your arm. Velocity on the other hand, is something that is easier to train.

This ninja punch basically relies on getting its force by committing most of your weight with the lunging step. Because there is no hip turn and no arm motion to speak of, it is slow as crap. Real slow. Like, all day slow. Not only that, but even if their hands were up normally, because there isn't any arm motion, it is stuck out their for a long time and you can't block with it either. Sorry, said I wouldn't go off like that. I'm more interested in the force = 1/2 a normal punch issue.

This guy believes that the hip turn and arm motion that most people use when they punch generates a factitious force that feels stronger or more useful, but really isn't. He believe that this is the only really strong punch a person can do.

Anyone on here have any experience with Ninjitsu that can shed some light on this?


As someone who only studied for about two years around college-age...this sounds like a damn fine way to get your arm snapped clean in half while accomplishing nothing useful. It also sounds wonderful for putting yourself off-balance. Even if he's right, and my own aborted experiments on the subject indicate he's not (...please don't ask), the disadvantages presented are bad enough that it's not really good advice.

The Exchange

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I just want to pipe in, with no ninjitsu training, about my own martial experiences. I have studied Tang Soo Do (black belt), Tae Kwan Do (black belt), Wing Chun Kung Fu (Purple sash), Boxing and Kickboxing (not the Taiwanese version), and I just recently joined a Wushu school and am starting trainin in that......
Every style is of the belief that they do IT the right way and that their way is superior. This is not true, however every style of training has useful and good techniques to learn that obviously were used to good effect at some point in history, from greco-roman wrestling to karates to fencing to.....etc.
My suggestion is to learn the style you are being taught, as it is being taught. Keep your mind open and absorb what you are learning BUT keep your eyes open to the weaknesses of the style and figure out what you would do differently to fix that weakness in a combat situation.
I may have studied many things but I have one fighting style....Kick-ass-when-I-need-to style. It is made up of all the good techniques I have learned blended together into what I will use if I need to defend myself or others. You are on your way to creating your own style but only by absorbing a style and filtering through it will you be able to separate the good from the not-so-good techniques.


Also, you're looking at this from the perspective of the first class. You're really in position to judge the effectiveness of anything in the style yet.
If your instructor is relying on entirely on one type of punch he's an idiot. If he's trying to teach anything more than minimal basics to a novice in the first class he's also an idiot.
Is this the main focus of the style or is this just a basic type of punch they use as a starting point?

OTOH, I'm always a little wary of Ninjitsu instructors just on the grounds of "Ooh Ninja!" fads. I'm sure there are teachers who actually know what they're doing, but I'll bet the percentage of poseurs is higher than in other arts.


I'm not a fighter myself, but half an hour of google, two messageboards and a dozen videos later I think I have your answers. It's not a powerful punch but it seems to have a good amount of range and apparently can be used to close the distance against kickers or weapon users or to initiate a fight before your opponent.
But your trainers belief is totally bonkers, considering that ninjutsu does have a lot of other strikes that aren't like that. The lunge punch is just one technique, the others are more similar to normal boxing techniques.


Thanks for the input gents.

Honestly, I'm surprised there aren't more ninjas around here.

Katana Katana Katana (;

VM mercenario wrote:

I'm not a fighter myself, but half an hour of google, two messageboards and a dozen videos later I think I have your answers. It's not a powerful punch but it seems to have a good amount of range and apparently can be used to close the distance against kickers or weapon users or to initiate a fight before your opponent.

But your trainers belief is totally bonkers, considering that ninjutsu does have a lot of other strikes that aren't like that. The lunge punch is just one technique, the others are more similar to normal boxing techniques.

Yeah, I'm starting to think the same thing. Thanks for the research. I saw a few videos of some ninjas doing regular looking MMA strikes with their hands up.

Who knows what the "real" system is (if there is such a thing) and what some random martial arts instructor decided to add in or take out.

Silver Crusade

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

It only works if you shout the name of the attack while you do it.

Faaaaalcoooooon Puuuuuuuuunnnnnccchhh!


DM_aka_Dudemeister wrote:

It only works if you shout the name of the attack while you do it.

Faaaaalcoooooon Puuuuuuuuunnnnnccchhh!

This is ninjitsu. Every third time you say the name of a different move to throw them off.

"Falcon Punch? I'm sorry, I meant Falcon Kick! Hahaha"


.

My personal opinion of a *ninja punch* is something along the lines of...

"If you're a Ninja, and you are punching something has gone terribly wrong."

.


Ninjutsu is a misnomer applied to taijutsu, if memory serves.


Do keep in mind that there are plenty of martial arts schools out there that are not actually teaching you martial arts any more than a kid copying moves he saw on Street Fighter can, even if the instructor might believe it.

Liberty's Edge

You want to learn how to fight? Get in fights. You'll either get tired of getting your butt kicked and adapt, or you won't.

All this "belt" noise just means you stayed with it long enough to get a gold star from the teacher. It means zip when it comes to whether or not you can take care of yourself. For every "black belt" holder that can actually fight, there are a ton that probably couldn't beat up Nelson from the Simpsons.

If you'e taking martial arts for fitness and whatnot, right on. If you're trying to learn how to fight, go to prison for a while. It'll be a lot more productive.


Grand Magus wrote:

.

My personal opinion of a *ninja punch* is something along the lines of...

"If you're a Ninja, and you are punching something has gone terribly wrong."

.

Yeah, I expect a Ninja class to include more free solo climbing, homemade fireworks and toxic plant extracts.

The Exchange

houstonderek wrote:

You want to learn how to fight? Get in fights. You'll either get tired of getting your butt kicked and adapt, or you won't.

All this "belt" noise just means you stayed with it long enough to get a gold star from the teacher. It means zip when it comes to whether or not you can take care of yourself. For every "black belt" holder that can actually fight, there are a ton that probably couldn't beat up Nelson from the Simpsons.

If you'e taking martial arts for fitness and whatnot, right on. If you're trying to learn how to fight, go to prison for a while. It'll be a lot more productive.

I believe the only person to post anything about belts was me so is this a post against me? I will try to assume not.

I have known many black belts that thought they were the shiznit when in reality they couldn't handle a street fight to save their lives. I have also known many who trained with more of a focus towards what happens in a real fight that could actually fight. Picking on the belt system and saying stuff like "get in fights or go to prison to learn how to fight" is pretty stupid IMO. Mostly all you learn there is how to get your a$$ beat by someone big who has fighting instincts.
Training in a martial arts style will give you tools to use but only if you supply the fighting instinct and an eye towards what is practical in the street.
I don't think committing a felony is the right way to get training in combat. I think walking around looking to punch someone is also a pretty idiotic idea for learning to fight.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
houstonderek wrote:
If you're trying to learn how to fight, go to prison for a while.

That's your answer for everything!

Liberty's Edge

Fake Healer wrote:
houstonderek wrote:

You want to learn how to fight? Get in fights. You'll either get tired of getting your butt kicked and adapt, or you won't.

All this "belt" noise just means you stayed with it long enough to get a gold star from the teacher. It means zip when it comes to whether or not you can take care of yourself. For every "black belt" holder that can actually fight, there are a ton that probably couldn't beat up Nelson from the Simpsons.

If you'e taking martial arts for fitness and whatnot, right on. If you're trying to learn how to fight, go to prison for a while. It'll be a lot more productive.

I believe the only person to post anything about belts was me so is this a post against me? I will try to assume not.

I have known many black belts that thought they were the shiznit when in reality they couldn't handle a street fight to save their lives. I have also known many who trained with more of a focus towards what happens in a real fight that could actually fight. Picking on the belt system and saying stuff like "get in fights or go to prison to learn how to fight" is pretty stupid IMO. Mostly all you learn there is how to get your a$$ beat by someone big who has fighting instincts.
Training in a martial arts style will give you tools to use but only if you supply the fighting instinct and an eye towards what is practical in the street.
I don't think committing a felony is the right way to get training in combat. I think walking around looking to punch someone is also a pretty idiotic idea for learning to fight.

Dude, if you want to learn how to do something, you do it. If you want to learn how to look pretty, you join 95% of the completely worthless martial arts schools in the country. Martial arts schools aren't about learning how to fight, they're about taking your money and letting you think you know how to fight.

My point was, why are you taking a martial arts class if you want to learn how to fight? They're great for getting in shape, but they're pointless otherwise. Like you said, they just get a bunch of people thinking they're Bruce Lee, when they're really Bruce Vilanch.

Liberty's Edge

Doodlebug Anklebiter wrote:
houstonderek wrote:
If you're trying to learn how to fight, go to prison for a while.
That's your answer for everything!

Well, you learn to fight, or you learn to enjoy wearing Koolaid lipstick.

The Exchange

houstonderek wrote:

Dude, if you want to learn how to do something, you do it. If you want to learn how to look pretty, you join 95% of the completely worthless martial arts schools in the country. Martial arts schools aren't about learning how to fight, they're about taking your money and letting you think you know how to fight.

My point was, why are you taking a martial arts class if you want to learn how to fight? They're great for getting in shape, but they're pointless otherwise. Like you said, they just get a bunch of people thinking they're Bruce Lee, when they're really Bruce Vilanch.

Certainly taking liberties with my posts aren't you? Never said anything like the bolded part of your statement. You seem to have a very large prejudice against Martial Arts Schools so it is gonna be pointless to argue with you. I get it, you went to prison and you are a bada$$ fighting machine and all other ways to learn to fight only makes people pu$$ys. I been to jail and it wasn't the "fight club" you seem to make it into although some places are rougher than others.

Everything you ever learn in life is taught to you. You don't just jump out of a plane, you learn how to pack a chute, pull proper cords, etc. You don't just pilot an airplane, you take a class to learn how the aircraft works and spend a ton of time doing simulations. You don't just decide to build a house, you spend time learning from someone who can show you the way to do it and spend years getting good at it. Learn something by doing it....good way to get hurt. I've been in more than a few fights and I wouldn't like to go into one with no knowledge of how to handle myself. Good way to get dead nowadays.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
houstonderek wrote:


Dude, if you want to learn how to do something, you do it. If you want to learn how to look pretty, you join 95% of the completely worthless martial arts schools in the country. Martial arts schools aren't about learning how to fight, they're about taking your money and letting you think you know how to fight.

My point was, why are you taking a martial arts class if you want to learn how to fight? They're great for getting in...

Does "if you want to learn how to do something, you do it" apply to everything? Training is useless? If you want to learn how to fly a plane, just get in one and take off?

Getting in fights a lot might get you better at fighting. It might also get you crippled or brain damaged.

A lot of modern martial arts aren't designed for street fighting or self-defense, they're designed for tournaments. Some schools are just scams. Even in the best ones you're not going to become Bruce Lee in a couple hours a week.

The other thing to remember is that despite what the movies might tell you, "black belts" aren't the elite. It pretty much means you're no longer a novice and are competent to use some of the things you've learned in a real situation. No guarantees, but they might help.


Usually, when you have your first degree black belt, you're just in shape enough to actually be more of a danger to the other person than yourself. Belts are useful for a few things(knowing how to put a class together, for example), but just having one doesn't mean that you're a killing machine. Besides, we're ALL killing machines. A fighting system means you're a bit more organized(and most definitely in shape...throwing punches for two solid minutes is EXHAUSTING) than the other guy.

Re: Ninjitsu, just keep taking classes. Follow your instincts. Not every style or class is going to work for you. If you don't like it, you don't like it, and you will be better off finding something you DO like than trying to find reasons why you don't like it. It's far, far, FAR more likely that something is simply not to your taste, build, or philosophy than it simply doesn't work. I've been on both sides of that equation before, and feeding someone crow really feels just as bad as eating it yourself, in my experience.

Re: The specific punch, from what you described alone, it sounds like you're trying to keep your center mass away from the person with your weight shifted so that you can react to danger faster than just go balls out and crack someone in the face. I dunno. I'd have to see it. There also could be a tai-chi esque element of "do it slow to build form, do it fast to remove internal organs" to it.

And yes, HD, as much as I love you man, I don't think picking up a chair and swinging it into the base of someone's spine is a great way to learn how to fight, if you're the guy receiving the chair in the spine. As much as it grates against my chaotic nature, organized classes work better for more people for the more of the time.


4 people marked this as a favorite.

This is the only true way.

I've studied Count Dante's methods ever since I saw his ad in Micronauts #3 in 1979. Everything else is just bunk.


Freehold DM wrote:

Usually, when you have your first degree black belt, you're just in shape enough to actually be more of a danger to the other person than yourself. Belts are useful for a few things(knowing how to put a class together, for example), but just having one doesn't mean that you're a killing machine. Besides, we're ALL killing machines. A fighting system means you're a bit more organized(and most definitely in shape...throwing punches for two solid minutes is EXHAUSTING) than the other guy.

Re: Ninjitsu, just keep taking classes. Follow your instincts. Not every style or class is going to work for you. If you don't like it, you don't like it, and you will be better off finding something you DO like than trying to find reasons why you don't like it. It's far, far, FAR more likely that something is simply not to your taste, build, or philosophy than it simply doesn't work. I've been on both sides of that equation before, and feeding someone crow really feels just as bad as eating it yourself, in my experience.

Re: The specific punch, from what you described alone, it sounds like you're trying to keep your center mass away from the person with your weight shifted so that you can react to danger faster than just go balls out and crack someone in the face. I dunno. I'd have to see it. There also could be a tai-chi esque element of "do it slow to build form, do it fast to remove internal organs" to it.

And yes, HD, as much as I love you man, I don't think picking up a chair and swinging it into the base of someone's spine is a great way to learn how to fight, if you're the guy receiving the chair in the spine. As much as it grates against my chaotic nature, organized classes work better for more people for the more of the time.

Don't worry, I'm going to stick with the ninjitsu classes for a little while. I'm excited to get the ninja's secrets. (;

For the rest of your post, about fighting and belts, I get that - I do. But I think it alone is a part of what rubs people the wrong way about martial arts and I think it is a bit of a problem.

The usual martial arts progression of flexibility -> techniques -> advanced techniques and forms -> memorization of the system's details -> reality based drills -> fighting, a process that takes 3-5 years, really doesn't produce people that can fight. It produces people that look good doing martial arts, and it debatably produces people that can start swinging real hard if they were attacked, but to outside observers it seems suspicious.

If I open a school, what I'm going to be teaching is going to take a page from boxing and MMA as far as training goes. By the end of the first month I want students competently throwing punches and blocks, and starting to kick. By the end of the first year, I want them comfortably able to SPAR with any amateur from any gym On top of this, there will be self defense techniques and ideas, but I don't plan to focus on those as much. I think the high number of repetitions people do of those moves are useless. Creativity from practicing those techniques - some - combined with heightened reflexes from sparing all the time and an intellectual awareness of how street crime and riots play out, by watching videos and reading, is the money maker.


cranewings wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:

Usually, when you have your first degree black belt, you're just in shape enough to actually be more of a danger to the other person than yourself. Belts are useful for a few things(knowing how to put a class together, for example), but just having one doesn't mean that you're a killing machine. Besides, we're ALL killing machines. A fighting system means you're a bit more organized(and most definitely in shape...throwing punches for two solid minutes is EXHAUSTING) than the other guy.

Re: Ninjitsu, just keep taking classes. Follow your instincts. Not every style or class is going to work for you. If you don't like it, you don't like it, and you will be better off finding something you DO like than trying to find reasons why you don't like it. It's far, far, FAR more likely that something is simply not to your taste, build, or philosophy than it simply doesn't work. I've been on both sides of that equation before, and feeding someone crow really feels just as bad as eating it yourself, in my experience.

Re: The specific punch, from what you described alone, it sounds like you're trying to keep your center mass away from the person with your weight shifted so that you can react to danger faster than just go balls out and crack someone in the face. I dunno. I'd have to see it. There also could be a tai-chi esque element of "do it slow to build form, do it fast to remove internal organs" to it.

And yes, HD, as much as I love you man, I don't think picking up a chair and swinging it into the base of someone's spine is a great way to learn how to fight, if you're the guy receiving the chair in the spine. As much as it grates against my chaotic nature, organized classes work better for more people for the more of the time.

Don't worry, I'm going to stick with the ninjitsu classes for a little while. I'm excited to get the ninja's secrets. (;

For the rest of your post, about fighting and belts, I get that - I do. But I think it alone is a part of what rubs...

I'm glad to hear you're going to stick with it. In the end it may not be for you, but instead of a waste of money, view it as an investment in something that didn't work out for you.

And if you think someone who has been training regularly for 3-5 years can't fight..well..I hope you don't end up testing that out. I would more say that anyone can be sucker punched, and we all can have bad days. All training, even aggressive training, does is ensure that those days are reduced to a fraction of their former total. With the internet and the omnipresent martial arts style ego(myself included. What, you think I don't think my kung fu is better than yours? :-) ), a few really weird situations can make people feel that a particular style is weak, ineffective, or just plain stupid. This is almost NEVER the case in practice, however, as the situations where it would be in practice are ones that the average person, and even the average martial artist, will never, EVER see as a witness. To me, it's all just preparation for the day that you might actually have to defend yourself, and I pray to GOD that that day never, EVER comes. I'm happy living a peaceful life and getting along with the people around me. If trouble comes looking for me, I will do everything I can to avoid it. I keep change in my pocket for the desperate and poor, and I avoid bad areas, day or night. However, if someone really wants to do me serious physical injury or even death regardless of what I can do to alleviate the situation, I will defend myself to the best of my ability, using everything I have learned from every martial art and street fight I have ever been in. If I die, I die. But I will fight for my life and make my death as messy as possible.


If your dojo doesn't teach the death touch, forgetabout it.


Freehold, I respect that, I do. Martial arts is one of those things that our experiences can jade us.

I've been doing martial arts, more or less regularly, for about 10-11 years or so. I don't remember exactly how old I was when I started.

Anyway, the first martial arts I did were Kali and Silat. I dedicated about 4 years to those martial arts pretty hard core, lost a bunch of weight, and even mixed in some grappling. The teacher I went to after that taught a sparing class at the school, mostly of his own students, where there was very little crossover.

The first week I started sparing with them, after having trained for 4 years, I got my butt kicked by people who had only been training, at all, for 3 months. All of those reflexes and reality based drills did squat against someone that wasn't trying to be predictable and was motivated to actually hit me, so I started training with them and bouncing around other schools picking up this or that. It wasn't until I trained with the new folks for a year or two that I was able to start using Kali and Silat against boxers and wrestlers that weren't trying to let me. It took a long time to build up better reflexes, even though I thought I had them.

The only schools that had students who were able to stand up to us were the ones with real boxers and kick boxers or MMA people, and of them, only the ones with teachers who had traditional backgrounds. During my city tour of all the fighting we have to sample, it became clear to me that the best fighters were the ones with traditional backgrounds who went to MMA, seconded by regular MMA people, and followed up way in the rear by traditional martial artists rather if they spar in their own school or not.

Does the ability to put on gloves and spar one person translate to actual fighting ability? I don't know. The ninja I'm learning from doesn't seem to think so. Personally, I think having a single someone get in front of you and alert you to when the fight starts is the most advantageous situation you could hope for when it comes to street fighting, so if you can't even handle sparing, what makes you think you will do any better if their is more than one person or they have a weapon or they attack before you know you are in trouble?

Usually people from traditional martial arts that have success in fighting people come from schools with oddities that aren't shared, in my experience, with most places. For example, we have a korean school here with students that can fight because the instructor mixes Yudo, TKD, and Hapkido and lets them spar outsiders. It is sort of an old school MMA, but it isn't typical.


Spanky the Leprechaun wrote:
If your dojo doesn't teach the death touch, forgetabout it.

Every dojo teaches one of two types of touches- the kind that kill(boring) or the kind that make the other person wish they were dead(far, far more interesting!).


One man's boredom is another man's efficient use of power.


Spanky the Leprechaun wrote:
One man's boredom is another man's efficient use of power.

Fair point.


there's nothing boring about Count Dante.


Cranewings:

You mentioned training in boxing so I would suggest looking up a tape of the Bernard Hopkins vs Kelly Pavlik fight. Hopkins said he noticed that Pavlik pointed his rear foot out at about 90 degrees to his body and this prevented him from using that leg to generate as much power as he could with a straight punches across his own body. He could not turn his waist fully into the punch so he could not throw crosses and straight rights very well. That foot position prevents you from being bending your knee in the correct manner and still keep your balance. It also will hamper your ability to move laterally. I am not sure, but I think it would impede your ability to throw kicks as well.

P.S.

Ameri Do Te is the only way to fight, everything else is bull&#!^! Look up "enter the dojo" on Youtube.


Bill Lumberg wrote:

Cranewings:

You mentioned training in boxing so I would suggest looking up a tape of the Bernard Hopkins vs Kelly Pavlik fight. Hopkins said he noticed that Pavlik pointed his rear foot out at about 90 degrees to his body and this prevented him from using that leg to generate as much power as he could with a straight punches across his own body. He could not turn his waist fully into the punch so he could not throw crosses and straight rights very well. That foot position prevents you from being bending your knee in the correct manner and still keep your balance. It also will hamper your ability to move laterally. I am not sure, but I think it would impede your ability to throw kicks as well.

P.S.

Ameri Do Te is the only way to fight, everything else is bull&#!^! Look up "enter the dojo" on Youtube.

Oh yeah, good points. I love having more reasons to pile contempt onto a move I already don't think is any good (;

Seriously though, almost every kick you throw wide you can throw better by bringing it straight and narrow. I practice the muay thai outer leg kick while standing a couple inches from a wall. Not much point if your legs are 3 feet apart with one cocked out sideways.

The video was hysterical. The comment, "Its cheaper than a movie and always something weird going on, plus there are girls," seriously reminds me of a place I used to train.


Hmmmm a couple things that occur to me off the top of my head about this:

One of the things I think it is important to realize is that the force of a blow, beyond the bare minimum required to do what you are trying to do isn’t really all that important, and that hitting someone super hard in a fight can be more of a drawback than an advantage. When using some form of handstrike the two most important things involved are that you protect your hands from damage and that you hit the person somewhere vulnerable.

Using great force can damage your hands, especially if you hit a hard area like the jawline and you want avoid that as much as possible.

When hitting someone in a vulnerable spot(and I’m speaking more about soft tissues not crippling places like the throat or solar plexus) you don’t actually need that much force to cause great pain and harder hits will proportionally hurt your hands more too.

Another thing to consider is that the harder you hit someone the more invested in the blow you are which is nothing but a disadvantage especially when, hilariously enough, fighting someone who does that ninjitsu s#@~. Those guys have some of the best arm and hand locks I have ever seen, the last thing you want to do this get too far into their space with a punch lol.

As far as the speed goes the punch might be slower but it does both keep you from becoming overcommitted and, even more important, it doesn’t make you telegraph your attacks, which really is one of the strongest contributing factors to why someone who is skilled at fighting can manhandle the s@$~ out of someone who isn’t.

Is your teacher full of s+~+? I dunno. Is the punch worthless? Could be. But from what you’ve told us it could be worth hanging around and learning from the guy.

P.S.: As far as the sparring thing goes, yes, struggling with a real person is a very important part of actually getting good but it is also rather dangerous, even when basically just playing around, I wouldn’t be too hard on the guy for not doing it in his classes.

P.P.S: Also, as far as the stance goes you wouldn’t be using that stance consistently in a fight(unless you instructor is insane), only within the split second you throw the punch, and it is actually good for that, also, having an uneven stance when you attack has the added bonus of putting one thigh forward, which, as a man, does a lot to keep you from getting kicked in the balls.


I think thats a huge advantage of learning grappling: its not that the style is better, its that you can practice it 'for real' on another person in more realistic conditions without breaking your fingers or someone else's jaw


BigNorseWolf wrote:
I think thats a huge advantage of learning grappling: its not that the style is better, its that you can practice it 'for real' on another person in more realistic conditions without breaking your fingers or someone else's jaw

Yes, I would agree with that and also say that is a good thing to learn for your average person focusing on self defense because of the emphasis it places on controlling your opponent and keeping him from controlling you, which fits well with what I consider should be your primary goal in 90% of fights, which isn’t defeating your opponent, that is the end game but also a secondary concern in most cases, but protecting yourself and potentially others from getting hurt.


I've been looking for a good school to learn Wing Chun in. I like the centerline defense/counter method intereting, it doesn't seem to require a whole lot of physical ability to work well, just time and effort to study. If anyone knows of a good place in the Omaha NE area, let me know, please.


Kryzben, don't be fooled by wing chung. I think it is good and I do use it a little, but I had to do a lot of sparring to get to a point where I could find a place for it.

They basically tell you, same as ninjutsu likes to, that boxing isn't good. So you will never see a western boxing punch in class and it turns out western boxing naturally counters a lot of wing chung. Worse still, almost everyone you will ever spar or fight, who is dangerous, will box. Wing chung is cool, but it only works if you personally go through great effort to make it work. Otherwise it's just setting you up for a right hook to the chin.


It is true that western boxing gets a lot of criticism from many well trained martial artists, such as the classic joke:

Question: How do you know when you have won a fight?

Answer: When your opponent adopts a boxing stance.

But I don’t really think that it is all that bad, it just focuses on aspects of fighting that aren’t very productive against most skilled opponents.

The big problem with it is the emphasis on throwing punches and surviving punches, which is fine and helpful when fighting people who don’t know how to fight or other boxers but against others neither of those skills are particularly helpful.

The biggest problem involves something most people don’t realize: That in a fight one of your biggest vulnerable points is actually your hands. Every time you throw a punch you are providing your opponent the opportunity to put you in a wrist or arm lock (something that is pretty easy to do and can screw you royally) and potentially turn that into a finger lock (also pretty easy to do) and if that happens your only two choices are to break the lock, which almost always results in broken fingers, or scream for mercy before the other guy seizes control of you, twists you into a pretzel, and kills you.

I don’t know much about wing chung, so given your experience you are probably right about that, but in the case of those ninjutsu monkeys I feel that they are definitely entitled to their dismissive attitude, seeing as a great deal of their style seems focused on specifically turning those forceful(and honestly rather sloppy and repetitive) attacks boxers favor so much into broken bones and shorn tendons.


Dogbladewarrior wrote:

It is true that western boxing gets a lot of criticism from many well trained martial artists, such as the classic joke:

Question: How do you know when you have won a fight?

Answer: When your opponent adopts a boxing stance.

But I don’t really think that it is all that bad, it just focuses on aspects of fighting that aren’t very productive against most skilled opponents.

The big problem with it is the emphasis on throwing punches and surviving punches, which is fine and helpful when fighting people who don’t know how to fight or other boxers but against others neither of those skills are particularly helpful.

The biggest problem involves something most people don’t realize: That in a fight one of your biggest vulnerable points is actually your hands. Every time you throw a punch you are providing your opponent the opportunity to put you in a wrist or arm lock (something that is pretty easy to do and can screw you royally) and potentially turn that into a finger lock (also pretty easy to do) and if that happens your only two choices are to break the lock, which almost always results in broken fingers, or scream for mercy before the other guy seizes control of you, twists you into a pretzel, and kills you.

I don’t know much about wing chung, so given your experience you are probably right about that, but in the case of those ninjutsu monkeys I feel that they are definitely entitled to their dismissive attitude, seeing as a great deal of their style seems focused on specifically turning those forceful(and honestly rather sloppy and repetitive) attacks boxers favor so much into broken bones and shorn tendons.

I've got a game I play with people who tell me about how straightening your arm for a boxing punch is wrong. I tell them that I am going to throw a straight punch with whichever arm they pick, as many times as they like, and to win, all they have to do is grab my wrist or finger. They don't have to pop my elbow or fight my strength or even turn my hand over. All they have to do is grab my wrist while I'm punching.

I'm 270 pounds and I do not box. I do some boxing style punches as a part of my martial arts, but I spend very little time developing them and I know lots and lots and lots of people who are faster than me. I like to present this challenge to people who are themselves known for their strength and speed.

I have not once, ever, had someone able to grab my wrist. They might get their fingers around it, a little, but they can't hang on. It is all of their effort and skill to not be punched in the face. Once they have a punch coming at them from me, who is not at all interested in helping them perform the technique, they fail.

I agree that their are some problems with boxing. It is still a sport and the gloves make it so that you never have to worry about the shape of your fist. I believe the best punching is boxing style, but trained along with karate style fist hardening, by punching trees / walls, strengthening your wrists, and doing pushups on your fists. Kyokushin Karates is a LOT like this, though I disagree with their tradition of not going to the face. Putting gloves on to protect the other person so that you can train attacking the head is important to be a complete martial artist, in my opinion.

Anyway, all the talk of ninja grabbing your arm and breaking it because you straightened your arm doing a punch is something that they can only do during half speed sticky hands training among people who are trying to let it happen. It isn't real. If it ever did happen, it is just a fluke.


Yeah, that’s funny then in that our experiences are very very different. When it comes to punches arm, wrist and finger locks are always a very real possibility from what I’ve seen, and I’m not talking about theoreticals or training but from being in and observing many real fights.

It is interesting that so often martial artists have completely different views of what is a big threat in combat or not, especially because what they have been doing has been (at least in theory) working out for them.


Dogbladewarrior wrote:


Yeah, that’s funny then in that our experiences are very very different. When it comes to punches arm, wrist and finger locks are always a very real possibility from what I’ve seen, and I’m not talking about theoreticals or training but from being in and observing many real fights.

It is interesting that so often martial artists have completely different views of what is a big threat in combat or not, especially because what they have been doing has been (at least in theory) working out for them.

Eh, things still happen that change my world. I'm back in jujitsu right now. Even though I'm not interested in competing, something happened a while back that opened my eyes. Normally, I agree with ninjitsu self defense in that anytime someone tries to grapple you, in a self defense situation, you can still your thumb in their eye. Normally I simulate this sparring by driving my thumb into their cheek or something. It is usually pretty easy since their hands are busy.

I was sparing a guy who had me in a single leg up against the cage wall. I hit so hard that my typical down elbow to his neck felt feeble. Then he through me on the ground, onto my side, and got a side mount so complete with my back curled against the cage that I couldn't get my hands to his head and actually had to wrestle, resulting in a complete ass-kicking.

I'm not saying that you are wrong. I mean, two moves I practice more than anything - muay thai leg kicks and body hooks, I never ever use in sparing, but I still show them / train them because they are objectively good. Maybe some of the ninjitsu is good. I've just not seen anyone who can perform it in the prescribed way. In my world, it is still countered accidentally by normal movement.

Grand Lodge

If you're FIRST class in ninjitsu is already rolling out punches, I'd question the school itself. If the school and technique is actually called NINJITSU, thats an even bigger clue. I took Taijutsu for 4 years as a teenager and the entirety of the first year was learning to fall, roll, stretch correctly, and blocking.


Maccabee wrote:
If you're FIRST class in ninjitsu is already rolling out punches, I'd question the school itself. If the school and technique is actually called NINJITSU, thats an even bigger clue. I took Taijutsu for 4 years as a teenager and the entirety of the first year was learning to fall, roll, stretch correctly, and blocking.

If no one can punch, what do you practice blocking?

There isn't much point in practicing defense if there isn't a credible attack to test it on.


@cranewings

I guess the one thing I should point out(that you already know I am just vocalizing it) is that in a fight every last little advantage you squeeze out really is more opportunity based than anything else, so in the case of what I am talking about you aren’t going to try and catch every punch and when you do try you are not going to necessarily succeed but the threat the counter presents in terms of being able to shut down someone completely means most of the guys I know only punch when it is the “correct” choice rather than trying to rain down blow after blow with their hands on someone.

As to why I know a decent amount of people that can do this and you have never met anyone that can I’m not sure, maybe it is a symptom of what the people we know primarily focus on?


Dogbladewarrior wrote:

@cranewings

I guess the one thing I should point out(that you already know I am just vocalizing it) is that in a fight every last little advantage you squeeze out really is more opportunity based than anything else, so in the case of what I am talking about you aren’t going to try and catch every punch and when you do try you are not going to necessarily succeed but the threat the counter presents in terms of being able to shut down someone completely means most of the guys I know only punch when it is the “correct” choice rather than trying to rain down blow after blow with their hands on someone.

As to why I know a decent amount of people that can do this and you have never met anyone that can I’m not sure, maybe it is a symptom of what the people we know primarily focus on?

It could be. With the exception of one TKD school that mixes Yudo, TKD and Hapkido, I've had zero luck with finding traditional martial artists that can spar for crap (and those guys never actually use the hapkido). I get all of my sparing in with MMA people (who are always game to fight anyone) and I've not seen any kung fu or ninjas who can stand up with them.

Personally, I do use some wing chung, kali and silat in my sparing, but it wasn't until after I learned kick boxing / tkd and boxing well enough to spar, and then sparred for a long time, that my reflexes improved enough to use what I spent 4 years fretting over. I do not believe that anyone from a school that fails to spar with strangers will develop the reflexes it takes to do these moves, and without learning some boxing or kick boxing, you will never survive long enough to try anything.


Yeah, I agree with you on the sparring part and as far as the boxer training goes, I don’t know, I have no formal training in martial arts so personal experience is all I have to draw on, which is obviously extremely subjective, so you are probably right.

And oh yeah, I love MMA guys, playing around with them is soooo much fun, I have learned a lot from them in the last year and a half, although I must say, I do have a soft spot in my heart for my less seriously minded ninja monkey, parkour obsessed friends.

Grand Lodge

cranewings wrote:
Maccabee wrote:
If you're FIRST class in ninjitsu is already rolling out punches, I'd question the school itself. If the school and technique is actually called NINJITSU, thats an even bigger clue. I took Taijutsu for 4 years as a teenager and the entirety of the first year was learning to fall, roll, stretch correctly, and blocking.

If no one can punch, what do you practice blocking?

There isn't much point in practicing defense if there isn't a credible attack to test it on.

Yes, thank you tactical master, I'm aware of that. My point was that traditional Taijutsu is structured THAT way and not like a Karate dojo with 100 paying customers practising chambered punches. The senior students and instructors typically act as the aggressors during the initial training.


Maccabee wrote:
cranewings wrote:
Maccabee wrote:
If you're FIRST class in ninjitsu is already rolling out punches, I'd question the school itself. If the school and technique is actually called NINJITSU, thats an even bigger clue. I took Taijutsu for 4 years as a teenager and the entirety of the first year was learning to fall, roll, stretch correctly, and blocking.

If no one can punch, what do you practice blocking?

There isn't much point in practicing defense if there isn't a credible attack to test it on.

Yes, thank you tactical master, I'm aware of that. My point was that traditional Taijutsu is structured THAT way and not like a Karate dojo with 100 paying customers practising chambered punches. The senior students and instructors typically act as the aggressors during the initial training.

For a whole year? I just don't get the point. People I know who are serious usually can get blocking and striking, with hardened wrists and fists, and be able to move around balanced within 3 months.

As far as questioning the school itself, I'd question it if there were students finishing their first year who couldn't hit back.


Dogbladewarrior wrote:

Yeah, I agree with you on the sparring part and as far as the boxer training goes, I don’t know, I have no formal training in martial arts so personal experience is all I have to draw on, which is obviously extremely subjective, so you are probably right.

And oh yeah, I love MMA guys, playing around with them is soooo much fun, I have learned a lot from them in the last year and a half, although I must say, I do have a soft spot in my heart for my less seriously minded ninja monkey, parkour obsessed friends.

lol well, if they are doing ninjitsu and parkor because they are trying to look sweet and have a good time running around, and their self defense is saying screw it and daring the fat body trying to fight them to jump the fence, they might be on to something (;


Hehe, yeah, although they might surprise you if you were to see them fight, most of them can hold their own against even the MMA guys. That’s one of the things that can happen with high energy but completely unemployable young adults, sometimes they spend all day every day scaling eight story buildings and waging elaborate ninja wars against each other in the woods=).

This generation is the bright future of America! =p

Grand Lodge

cranewings wrote:
Maccabee wrote:
cranewings wrote:
Maccabee wrote:
If you're FIRST class in ninjitsu is already rolling out punches, I'd question the school itself. If the school and technique is actually called NINJITSU, thats an even bigger clue. I took Taijutsu for 4 years as a teenager and the entirety of the first year was learning to fall, roll, stretch correctly, and blocking.

If no one can punch, what do you practice blocking?

There isn't much point in practicing defense if there isn't a credible attack to test it on.

Yes, thank you tactical master, I'm aware of that. My point was that traditional Taijutsu is structured THAT way and not like a Karate dojo with 100 paying customers practicing chambered punches. The senior students and instructors typically act as the aggressors during the initial training.

For a whole year? I just don't get the point. People I know who are serious usually can get blocking and striking, with hardened wrists and fists, and be able to move around balanced within 3 months.

As far as questioning the school itself, I'd question it if there were students finishing their first year who couldn't hit back.

The point is not there for you to get, as I'm not debating one martial art vs another. I'm providing information, not the logic behind that particular arts traditions. I'm not the ninja advocate nor was I Yagyu Jubei in a past life, so I don't care what you think of Taijutsu.

1 to 50 of 60 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Off-Topic Discussions / Ninjitsu Punch is So Slow - I Don't Get It All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.