
Eyolf The Wild Commoner |

I would have to assume so, but I possibly could see some issues with ability scores becoming so low that a creature is no longer effective >.> Thus negating its CR all together...
But that's just a hypothetical guess..., with no real math or test.
I believe hypothetical was the correct word for that.. ? Hmm

Eyolf The Wild Commoner |

Why not use the Young Creature simple template? It's CR -1.
Doesn't that reduce the size though, he doesn't want to reduce the size. (I'm assuming the reduction in size is in part what lowers the CR)
Also, O.O Holy shi- it's Sean.
Uhm >.> Question, did you ever do any work for a Pathfinder Feat Point System?, and any tips for converting your Feat Point system to PF?
=================
I assume you mean the quick-rules for the Young Template.. Though I suppose that would work.. isn't it factoring in the changes from a size decrease?
Yeah, I'm guessing even though it's the factors from a size, Sean is right, it would be the easiest and most efficient method from what I can see by using the Quick Rules for the simple template..
I just don't like that it's size factors, even though you wouldn't ya be reducing the size officially ><
Can't really argue with the guy, lol, he knows what he's doing ><
He's helped create the system, lol. ><
-Bows before you- (Not being sarcastic)

Sean K Reynolds Contributor |

The point of the quick-use version of the templates is that you don't have to reconfigure anything, and the "GM's best friend" rule of +2/-2 means you can handle it on the fly. As the quick-use versions are basically opposites (advanced is +2 better everywhere, young is -2 worse* everywhere), it doesn't really matter if you use the young creature template or "reverse" the advanced creature template.
* Yes, I know that "-2 worse" is actually +2 better, but you know what I mean. :p

lordzack |

The point of the quick-use version of the templates is that you don't have to reconfigure anything, and the "GM's best friend" rule of +2/-2 means you can handle it on the fly. As the quick-use versions are basically opposites (advanced is +2 better everywhere, young is -2 worse* everywhere), it doesn't really matter if you use the young creature template or "reverse" the advanced creature template.
* Yes, I know that "-2 worse" is actually +2 better, but you know what I mean. :p
The main problem with the young creature template is that it reduces the creature's size. I want a creature that is the same size as the base creature. One thing I've been thinking of is giving it a couple of negative levels.

Sean K Reynolds Contributor |

Sean K Reynolds wrote:* Yes, I know that "-2 worse" is actually +2 better, but you know what I mean. :pActually, that last part I don't comprehend.
In math, subtracting a negative value is the same as adding a positive value.
So MINUS -2 is the same as PLUS 2.
The main problem with the young creature template is that it reduces the creature's size. I want a creature that is the same size as the base creature. One thing I've been thinking of is giving it a couple of negative levels.
The "quick rules" version of the simple template (which is what I've been recommending in this discussion) doesn't actually change the creature's Size.