Sum. vs conjur. wiz.


Pathfinder First Edition General Discussion


Has anyone done a straight comparison of which is better in general? I didn't see the topic on the forums but perhaps i just missed it.

Shadow Lodge

They serve different roles in the party.

If you want to have a big monster that you control that tanks with the fighters then the summoner will be more appealing. The summoner can also be a supplemental martial character, (I suggest archery), he has a really nice supplemental summons ability (standard action/ minute per level is nice). Lastly he has a nice set of spells to help buff and do light battlefield control.

Conjurer is a wizard... he has fists full of spells.


McVargas wrote:
Has anyone done a straight comparison of which is better in general? I didn't see the topic on the forums but perhaps i just missed it.

The summoner has a closer relationship to the bard (druid after that). Ogre is right, he has battle field control and 3/4 BAB so he can step up as a support melee. For those of us that always wanted to play an arcane warrior type, but didnt like the flare of bards, i think this character will fit nicely.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / General Discussion / Sum. vs conjur. wiz. All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in General Discussion