It seems odd to me as well. It's certainly not reasonable to expect a thorough review of classic campaign settings less than a year after the game has been out, so I find myself wondering where this particular poster is coming from. Wizards has stated (and so far, met) a goal of one campaign setting per year. Forgotten Realms was first, Eberron is next. Where they go from there remains to be seen, but I'm afraid a bit of patience will be required. We still possess patience, right? Or have we really become so spoiled?
It seems odd to me as well. It's certainly not reasonable to expect a thorough review of classic campaign settings less than a year after the game has been out, so I find myself wondering where this particular poster is coming from. Wizards has stated (and so far, met) a goal of one campaign setting per year. Forgotten Realms was first, Eberron is next. Where they go from there remains to be seen, but I'm afraid a bit of patience will be required. We still possess patience, right? Or have we really become so spoiled?
I'm spoiled Scott!
but seriously I agree wholeheartedly with you and after some liking of 4e but deciding it wasn't the game I wanted to run I went back to 3.x for both of my games. However to be honest Mr. Betts' conversion of Burnt Offerings has made me try 4e again, except this time instead of just doing a premade 4e adventure, to try a labour of love and convert the savage tide campaign. I think it will work well and I'm thinking it won't be that hard (just alot of conversion) and in the end I may love 4e or not.... I think a full 30 level game will tell me one way or the other. :P