eric99's page

Organized Play Member. 12 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 9 Organized Play characters.


RSS


My daughter has create a undine character whose primary weapon is a net. Can anyone point to any minis with a net.

Thanks.


It's a little embarrassing to admit how far behind I am in reading my pathfinder products, but I just paged through my copy of Blood of Angels for the first time and realized that my copy is missing pages 9 through 24.

How can I go about getting a replacement copy. Please advise. Thanks.

Eric


I'm putting together a Tengu Rogue for Pathfinder Society play this afternoon. I selected Absalom Hotspur (+1 to initiative - regional trait) and Reactionary (+2 to initiative - combat trait) as my two traits.

Herolab is not giving me a +3 to initiative, I'm only getting a +2. Is there a rule against stacking two bonuses from traits?

If anyone knows, please respond. Thanks.


The subject line says it all - Do clerics get a free holy symbol (or in my case - an unholy symbol) at 1st level?

I believe a wizard gets his first spellbook free and all characters get a free outfit, but I not certain how holy symbols are handled.

As my cleric Duxim would say "please enlighten me."


I'm building my first summoner and have a eidolon with the Flight evolution. The Flight evolution includes language that "[t]he eidolon's fly speed can be increased by spending additional evolution points, gaining a 20-foot increase to fly speed for each additional point spend."

I can't find a one point evolution that adds 20 feet to fly speed.

What am I missing?


Since both a developer and my GM (a Venture Captain!) have now conspired against me, I guess I'll have to rethink my character. I still think the wording of the Boon Companion feat supports my reading of the feat.

I just wish that:

(1) I wouldn't have to deal with the smug "I told you so" attitude that is already evident from my GM. It must have something to do with the school he attended - I've noticed a similar attitude in other people who've attended the same institution ;-) and

(2) the wording of the feat had been different. The simple insertion of "In no event shall the class level of your animal companion exceed your character level" would have prevented any misunderstanding in the first place.

Now retreating to sulk in the corner.

Eric


2 people marked this as FAQ candidate.

I have a druid I was planning on using in PFS play. I had hoped that this character could use the Boon Companion feat.

As I read the feat, the abilities of my companion would be calculated as though my class (druid) were four levels higher, with the bonus limited to my overall character level.

As a result, I get (for a straight Druid):

1st level Druid - 2nd level Animal Companion
2nd level Druid - 4th level Animal Companion
3rd level Druid - 6th level Animal Companion
4th level Druid - 8th level Animal Companion
5th level and up Druid - Animal Companion 4 levels higher than Druid level

The GM who typically runs the PFS games I participate in has indicated that he feels (if I understand him correctly) that the Boon Companion feat is limited to Rangers, Clerics and any other classes that don't receive Animal Companions until fourth level. In other words, the Boon Companion feat lets Rangers and other similar classes have companions as powerful as Druids. He feels that Druids aren't allowed to use the feat to increase the power of their Companions.

Has anyone run into this issue? Is there any "official" ruling as to how the Boon Companion feat applies to Druids in PFS play?

Eric


I need the following:

One each of HH 8, 10, 13, 20, 51, 78, 84 & 89
One each of RW 10, 12, 23, 66, 73, 76 & 93

I have extras of the following:

HH 1, 4, 6, 7, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 25, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 62, 63, 64, 66, 67, 68, 71, 72, 74, 75, 76, 79, 81, 82, 83, 87, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 100, 101, 103, 105, 107, 109

RW 1, 5, 15, 19, 21, 25, 26, 28, 30, 31, 35, 36, 37, 39, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 53, 54, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 68, 69, 72, 74, 77, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 90, 94, 95, 99, 100, 104, 107

If you need to know whether my extras are foil or not, let me know.

Can anyone help me out?

Thanks.


A cleric of Ydersius can select Scalykind and Animal as it's two domains. Both domains give the cleric an animal companion. Would this cleric gain the use of both animal companions and, if human - with their bonus feat, be able to take boon companion twice to gain both animal companions at first level?

This doesn't seem right, but I see no reason why I can't do this. Can anyone point to any reason why i can't do this or confirm that it is allowed?

Thanks.


I'm building a Oracle that has the Bonded Mount revelation. The APG states that the bonded mount "functions as a druid's animal companion." Similar language would apply (1) if a cleric gains an animal companion with the Animal Domain; and (2) to a paladin's mount.

The Animal Companion section of the druid entry in the Core Rulebook includes a number of provisions that apply more to the druid than to the animal companion. For example, the druid receives a +4 to handle animal checks regarding his animal companion. The druid also can share spells with his animal companion.

I'm reading the entire animal companion section (including the +4 handle animal bonus and sharing spells) in the druid entry as applying to oracles, clerics, and paladins.

Also - Bonded Mounts for oracles and paladins have a minimum intelligence score of 6. Would I just take the normal ability scores for a a horse, wolf, whatever and increase the intelligence score to 6 with no other changes?

Am I correct on these two issues? Please enlighten me.

Thanks.

Eric


I received an e-mail from Paizo that order #736558 shipped on or around june 25th. I have yet to receive my copy of DO: Hollow's Last Hope.

Pleasde advise me of the order's current status. Thanks.


I would also like to change my D1 preorder to a subscription as well.

Please provide me with confirmation that this change has been made. Thanks.

Eric