
![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Orthos wrote:
Jerry Cummings wrote:The store charging is not the issue. It is the store saying charging a table fee is required by PFS organized play as well as saying that the store owner is a Venture Officer when he or she is not. Those are the issues, not charging for a table.Quoted separately and bolded for emphasis since we've gone a page and this is still being debated...
-
I suppose the part I find a bit muddled on this matter is that the OP describes that the store owner in question has "implied" these things. I am curious as to whether the owner literally said something like "This is PFS/Paizo's policy, not mine" or if it was simply interpreted that way by the OP (and possibly others?)
Is there any clarity on that, which I may have overlooked?
It is one thing for the store owner to literally claim the fee is requested by PFS/Paizo. It is entirely another to assume a request for a fee "to play PFS here" is the same thing.
If all this boils down to is a miss-communication between the OP and the store owner, the simplest solution would be to ask the store owner outright, for clarity. Right?