Wyrmholez's page

I am the LAW!

Dead or Alive, you're coming with me.

The Shepherd's Prayer: And Shepherd's we shall be...

Hadouken

Jump on my sword while you can evil doers. I won't be so gentle.

Hail to the king baby!

Vote for Pedro

Rogues have Full BAB and as an advanced Rogue Talent they can get pounce. My group has thought about changing the flanking requirement to the target being threatened by another ally.

I like this extra flat damage idea instead of the +Xd6.

We just recently killed that "Lizard-Boar" (With Devastating Wake?) critter (CR 16+/-) from the back of Beastiary 4. Our Cleric/Musket Master shot it a couple of times and my Sword Saint damn near took 80% of his total HP. It was a Critmas miracle for both sides. We we're level 12 Mythic 2 at the time. Our other character took shots at it but missed.

I have a question for everyone and I know this probably isn't the place to ask, but I'm going to be a rebel and ask anyway.

How should I handle a situation where the players attempt to target the commander of each army? I know if I just say they can't do it, there will be some complaining. How would you guys handle it?

-Car

If they are trying to target the opposing commander with their own army I'd say no. They are fighting as an army, and aiming an entire army at an individual among their own army isn't likely to happen.

But if they wanted to attempt to assassinate them personally I'd run it as a regular encounter with lots of support in the form of Mobs (like swarms but bigger) of Soldiers.

This is by no means a FAQ candidate. Specific trumps general. Tigers get better stuff because tigers kick ass.

They're GRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTTT?

Someone in the party better max out profession (barrister). :)

The Devil likes his peanuts?!?

Run them past a time dragon and have the soon to be doomed character aged right past 32. Seems like a contractual loophole.

Wyrmholez wrote:

DrDeth wrote:

You do understand that YOU gimped him, right?

And suddenly the GM was responsible for the PC's bad dice rolls!

Yes. The DM *choose* to go for rolling rather than point buy and *choose* to allow a new player to try and run with a rather cruddy set of rolls rather than CHOOSING to allow a re-roll.

So what you're saying is that the GM's *CHOICES* led to the PC's bad dice rolls... Interesting, I believe this warrants some investigation. Must find a way for the DM to choose to eat something that gives me good rolls.

Dirty trick is just a name. The effects of the maneuver can be flavored any number of ways. It would be silly to tie alignment restrictions to types of attacks. What would be next someone claiming a paladin should fall because he was attacking with full force and without mercy (a.k.a. Lethal Power Attack)?

Just my thoughts.

We did a "No Divine Magic" campaign once... It hurt, but the smart survived.

And my friend talks about a campaign they did in college with a critical hit and fumble table that could end up with you suffering Immaculate Conception from a critical fumble...

Didn't Oglaf just explain why you don't want to make a long journey on the back of a giant eagle?

As for broken spells, isn't Magic Jar basically: "I win the encounter if you guys protect my body"?

Oh look at the time! It's %@$&ing Walk-O'clock!

Everyone knows that a real party has six members: Ranger, Barbarian, Magician, Thief, Cavalier, and Acrobat.

BG2 made short work of those hacks! :D

The 3.5 Tome of Battle is the most fun I've ever had playing a melee character. I thought some of it was pretty corny and animeish but as a whole... Well, I'd happily maim someone in front of their mother to get something like that in Pathfinder.

Why would you have to make a sense motive or perception check to see if some one has becone panicked?

"A panicked creature must drop anything it holds and flee at top speed from the source of its fear"

Fighters don't just drop their weapons and fill their shorts with crap for the lawls.

If anything I think he should've started cowering!