Pig

Demicube's page

24 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


RSS


Aaron Shanks wrote:
drexl93 wrote:
Aaron Shanks wrote:
Aventhar wrote:
Demicube wrote:
Aaron Shanks wrote:
Demicube wrote:

I know it has been a crazy time at Paizo, but I still wanted to prod this to see where this is at.

Thanks!

I've advocated internally for someone to take a look, again.
Thank you Aaron!

Any news on this?

Thanks!

I have not heard. I have escalated this to those who might know how to make some progress on the issue. Thanks.
Hey there. I'm afraid this is still an issue for several of the cards, and since it has been 5 months since the last post I wanted to bump it a bit for visibility's sake.
Received. I have brought the issues to the web store's attention again. Thanks!

Hi Aaron!

So this still isn't fixed. I guess is there a chance you could poke them again? I would like to be able to use them and at this point and it has been over a year with no fix. Don't take this at me being mad at you by the by I know you are just the messenger. :)

Thanks!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Gortle wrote:
The Raven Black wrote:
That you can hit an incorporeal creature with your fist if you use DEX but not if you use STR is nonsensical enough to put the literal reading of RAW in doubt.

Its easy enough to explain. What the differenece between a big swing and a carefully placed strike to a particular spot? It just that there are occasionally spots on the ghost that are more solid as it tries to affect the material world. So you have to target those, a generic swing at where the ghost is just fails.

You also seem to be ignoring that all Incoporeal creates only have Finesse attacks themselves. They are carefully following this rule.

Except they don't all follow this rule. The new Ghost Pirate Captain has a non-finesse melee attack with it's cutlass:

https://2e.aonprd.com/Monsters.aspx?ID=1864


Fair enough about the crossbow wasn't really thinking about it as a ranged attack.

As far it's melee attack goes yeah I guess you could do that? I just thought it was funny that if you are reading this as RAW that it's main attack does nothing to most players and most monsters for that matter.


So here is something interesting I noticed when I was looking into this:

https://2e.aonprd.com/Monsters.aspx?ID=1864

This ghost (added with Book of the Dead) attacks do not have the finesse trait so if you take the strict RAW ruling with this ghost they cannot make attacks against physical creatures only other ghosts.


11 people marked this as a favorite.

It isn't a perfect solution but I have tended to use Lores for that level of specialization. So characters who have Cooking Lore or Violin Lore. It isn't perfect since those skills all use Int RAW, and are more designed for recall knowledge/earn income.


Aaron Shanks wrote:
Demicube wrote:

I know it has been a crazy time at Paizo, but I still wanted to prod this to see where this is at.

Thanks!

I've advocated internally for someone to take a look, again.

Thank you Aaron!


I know it has been a crazy time at Paizo, but I still wanted to prod this to see where this is at.

Thanks!


Honestly I am for getting rid of most real-world religious words in Pathfinder in general, so I would say that this is a great change.

Though I am wondering what a good name for the Phylactery of Faithfulness would be. Honestly I was sorta surprised this item was still around.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I know you guys have been busy but I wanted to check in again and see if any progress had been made with these.

Hope you guys enjoy your day off! :)


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Aaron Shanks wrote:
Aaron Shanks wrote:
Aventhar wrote:
Demicube wrote:

So I happened to get the PDF's/Digital Jpegs of these early and I noticed that several of the Jpegs are very poor quality. The artwork itself is very pixilated.

Good example is comparing Card 24 (Azarketi Explorer) jpeg verses the one in the pdf. That isn't the only example though there are several super-pixelated ones.

Yup- Confirmed. The same thing happened with the JPGs for the first set. Paizo was able to get it fixed pretty quickly though so I’m sure the download will be updated.
I have seen your post and will have someone look into it tomorrow. Thank you for bringing it to our attention.
In short, we did have tech issues on the digital product. We know what happened. We are working on a solution.

Glad to hear it Aaron, thanks for the update!


1 person marked this as a favorite.

So I just wanted to say that I very rarely if ever post on here save when I have customer support issues.

That being said I come here all the time and read what people have to say. I have seen you post on here several times and have enjoyed what you have had to say.

I just wanted to say that I wish you well, and to say I am seriously considering cutting my subscriptions as well.


So I happened to get the PDF's/Digital Jpegs of these early and I noticed that several of the Jpegs are very poor quality. The artwork itself is very pixilated.

Good example is comparing Card 24 (Azarketi Explorer) jpeg verses the one in the pdf. That isn't the only example though there are several super-pixelated ones.


Hey there I also noticed that my Paizo advantage discount didn't apply to my order as well!


David knott 242 wrote:


Before I go and generate yet another Customer Service thread on this subject -- Did anyone get the Thieves Guild set with their recently generated Pathfinder Battles subscription order?

No point in piling on if the problem is universal....

Mine did not as well.

The Thieves Guild set is with the July subscription shipment where as the dragons are being shipped with the Battle Case.


This still hasn't shipped.


Every time I try to add something to my cart this happens. Each and every time. lol

Same thing happens when I try to access my account for the first time.


This is still showing up as "Suspended Pending". Just wanted to let you guys know just in case it is still waiting to be shipped.


Huh interesting I only saw a single option when I was trying to order it. Must have been some chrome weirdness. I always have trouble ordering stuff using Chrome for some reason.

Go ahead and switch it over to standard post if you don't mind. Thank you and thanks for your patience as well! Stay safe. <3


Hey so I just completed this order (after the website glitched out me. I thought it hadn't completed at first).

This is for a deck and a map folio and the shipping is 19.19 which seems a bit excessive. Not sure if this is a error not so I wanted to bring it to your attention. Thanks!


Hello all!

Hope you guys are doing well and staying safe. After leaving my package in quarantine I finally opened it today and found that that this item was damaged:

Pathfinder Flip-Mat: Bigger Ancient Dungeon

Here is a picture of the damage: https://ibb.co/kGLxv2W

It has some more area's where the plastic is all bubbly and scratched off though that section is the worst of it.

If I could get a replacement that would be great.

Sorry for the trouble, and please everyone stay safe!


There is a minor typo in the description:

"These double-sided forest tiles come in convenient packaging for easy storage."

Looking forward to these, love the base set so far. :)


Oggron wrote:

Here's voting for spider gulch. Just sounds Euphonious (my new word of the day) compared to the others. Plus I can just see the banners and tattoo's on the brigands now...

Out of curiosity, what order of Hellknights is at work in this region?

And are we going to see any other factions in play?
Obviously the eponymous Pathfinders. Druman trade merchants? Razmiran missionaries? Petty little River kings vying for scraps of territory? The Druids of the Green circle? Lovecraftian Cultists? Dare I say Flumphs?

Certainly an interesting spot you've staked out. Will look forward to seeing how this plays out.

Incidentally, does anyone know if a full listing of demonym's for the inner sea nations is available anywhere?

Flumps would be awesome. Really having a order of Hellknights as a playable faction would be wonderful though not sure how that would work.

Ironic that I think Deepnettle sounds sort of silly myself, but that's just my two cent's. :)


I don't think that would really add all that much to the game. True that it would be more realistic, but it seems like it would be a whole lot of work with very little benefit.

The more time they spend on things like the above the less time they have to work on other things. Just my two cents though, I do like the idea and honestly back in the day when I played WoW I had similar thoughts. :)

Edit: Hope everyone is having a happy new year!


Death's Echo has a nice ring to it. I have to say I am also looking forward toward the building/economic systems of it. I used to play a MUD once upon a time that had kingdom building in it. I loved that game (though I can't recall the name of it. It was like Mark of Eden or something like that), and played it till Everquest came out.

When I realized Everquest was terrible I tried to find it again...alas I could not. So needless to say I am very excited. :) Keep it up!