Stranger Joshua's page

7 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.



3 people marked this as a favorite.

YES! YES! YES! I love starfinder so much, despite not playing it much, and the fact that Starfinder 2e is cross compatible with Pathfinder 2e is amazing, it means that when rules rely on something the other already has, we don't need to make a whole new book! Plus, we don't need to reprint the Human, Android, Elf, Orc, Dwarf, Gnome, Halfling, or Yoski for pathfinder 2e!


4 people marked this as a favorite.

I liked the drow, so I'm sad to see them go, but I do see why they needed to get the boot, in both a legal and a social (For lack of a better term) way.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

I do like this, it's kinda along the lines of the "You probably..." and "Others probably..." Sections on how the ancestries are typically seen. Will this be replacing that too?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

A playable formian ancestry with heritages based on the lower ranks of the formian hierarchy would be really cool imo.


6 people marked this as a favorite.
YuriP wrote:
Arcane fits well for monks that gets powers from constant study over magic itself to imbue into itself (I lack of a good example of arcane monks).

Maybe the monk-like sorcerers in the doctor strange movie?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
keftiu wrote:
Syntax_error wrote:
Funnily enough, I was going to talk about both Lashunta and kuru, but didn't because lashunta are frankly pretty normal for pathfinder and I just didn't want to touch on the baggage they bring, but I would like both to eventually make an appearance!

I'm not too worried about any baggage - the weird bioessentialist stuff wasn't really in their recent AP mini-appearance much at all, while Starfinder has lore I really like stating that social reforms eventually decoupled the Lashunta subtypes from sex and gender in their society.

The weird focus on gender-adjacent stuff is part of why I like them so much! Though I also just wanna be a Venusian psychic princess; what girl doesn't?

Fair enough. I like them because of psychics being one of my favorite types of magic.

On the point of the Kuru, I would like to see their lore be reworked before they make an appearance as anything.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Perpdepog wrote:

I'd like to see d'zeriak make it as an ancestry. The way they speak through coded light pulses, and are nominally kind Shadow Plane natives is cool.

Worms that walk are also something I'd like to see, and bang on about ad nauseum, though I feel like they might be an archetype rather than an ancestry.

I'd also like to see the astomoi make a comeback, mostly because I'd love to learn more about them. As of now they're kind of just ... there.

I would like the astomoi to make a return too, I really like their design and what little lore we got of them.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Twiggies wrote:
Syntax_error wrote:
I would like a lamia of some sort. Probably not gonna happen, but it would be fun.
Don't we already have this with the nagaji? Or is it something different?

Huh, turns out we do. It's the sacred nagaji for anyone curious.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Kobold Catgirl wrote:

train ancestry train ancestry train ancestry train ancestry

And also, um, something like the yellow musk creeper or a mostly-free-willed minion of something like it would be cool. A talking animal ancestry, too, if the new book doesn't give us one. Bat people and merfolk probably aren't "weird". Um, archetypes or ancestries for fallen fiends who've lost their powers, maybe? I know nephilim kind of covers that, but it could be cool to play something closer to a hezrou or succubus on a redemption path--or maybe an anti-redemption path, trying to stop caring about people so they can just get home and pretend none of this ever happened, darn it. Oh, and let us play pretty unicorns, please-and-thank-you.

I actually made a construct race for 5e based off of steam trains, funnily enough, so I would like to see something like that.

Keftiu wrote:

Paizo has done a remarkably good job of chewing through my list over the last few years. We got Androids back remarkably early, Kholo are getting promoted up to Core 2, Minotaurs and Wyvarans both finally got confirmed… I’m eating good.

I’m still holding out hope for the Castrovelian pair someday, the psychic gender aliens of the Lashunta (my beloved!) and the ant-like Formians they’ve long feuded with. Formians feel like they’ve actually got decent odds; we’ve seen them a few times now in 2e, with options that readily map to potential Heritages.

Sekmin, the infamous Serpentfolk, are also dear to me. I like their place as bitter losers of a war that’s essentially prehistoric now, and telepathic mutant snakes are awesome.

Kuru, the native Ancestry of the Shackles who were pushed into contact with cursed Cyclops ruins by Chelish colonization, desperately need an update to make them something more than “evil indigenous cannibals.” Becoming a PC option would help a lot with that!

An aberrant Versatile Heritage, similar to but distinct from Fleshwarps, would be lovely.

Everyone knows I love Wyrwoods, but a trip to Arcadia feels inevitable - I’m not worried about their chances of getting in.

Funnily enough, I was going to talk about both Lashunta and kuru, but didn't because lashunta are frankly pretty normal for pathfinder and I just didn't want to touch on the baggage they bring, but I would like both to eventually make an appearance!

An eldritch scion versatile heritage could fill the same role as the nephilem. just for the major aberrations at play.

And touching on wyrwoods, yes.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

As the title, what are the real oddballs you want to play that you currently cannot?

My selection for ancestries are:

Trox, I just really like the design

Formians, starfinder made me really like them

And any sort of purely natural aberration, like maybe yaddithan or denizen of Ib


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I personally prefer the more classical kobold look to wyvaran heads, with the dog snout and such. I don't know why, I just like it.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
keftiu wrote:
Syntax_error wrote:

A Wyvaran, which is coming soon.

A Numeria setting book.

A Technology guide.

The Inquisitor, Bloodrager (Can be an archetype), and a shifter class.

Edit: Forgot the Wayang and Samsaran ancestries. I want those.

Samsaran and Wayang are confirmed for the Tian Xia books, alongside Tanuki and three unknown Ancestries!

Ooh, I did not know that, thank you.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

A Wyvaran, which is coming soon.

A Numeria setting book.

A Technology guide.

The Inquisitor, Bloodrager (Can be an archetype), and a shifter class.

Edit: Forgot the Wayang and Samsaran ancestries. I want those.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Might as well give my two cents on this whole thing.

Alignment is long overdue for it's departure, and I'm tired of trying to make it more nuanced. If I want a system of aligning my character with something, I'll just use a better system than a grid of 9 alignments (Like the MTG color pie for example).

Ability scores: I'm privy to clearing up this, since it's obnoxious in a system that doesn't actively affect them.

Removal of OGL monsters: I will miss some, I'll probably forget others.

Dragons: Nice to see a new take on dragons, but I will miss the classic chromatic/metallic dynamic.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I am hoping for drow to just get a redux to be unique from the OGL. Dark Elves are not a unique thing to dnd, and it would be fun to see Paizo come up with their own ideas regarding them.

Side note, this whole thread is kind of a mess, though I guess we will need something to fill the void of alignment threads/j


5 people marked this as a favorite.

Every time WotC has f!#*ed up within my lifetime, Paizo has been there to strike back and do something for the community. This is honestly great news to my gaming group.