Rocketmail1's page

So, here's a question; did the Paizo developers really not see the inherent imbalance of 3.5 (and now Pathfinder) core rules, or did they just ignore it? Really, despite improvements to certain overpowered spells and classes, it doesn't really make a difference. Spellcasters still rule the game past level sevenish or so, and melee still have no way to use good standard actions, or have any out of combat utility at all. Has the status quo been retained for backwards compatibility reasons, or what? It just seems strange that with such good examples as the focused spellcasters (Dread Necromancer, Beguiler, etc.), Tome of Battle, and other resources that fighters still gain only numerical bonuses, rather than anything versatile, fun, or useful outside of combat.

Anyways, am I the only one seeing this as a problem?

Pathfinder is designed to be backwards compatible. If you didn't think it was balanced before, you won't think it's balanced now. And there was alot of hate directed towards ToB.

There is a latin phrase "res ipsa loquitur" which means literally "the thing speaks for itself".

The point is one cannot describe as "good faith" the conduct of a person who offered a pre-ordered product, take your money, and consistently fail to deliver the said product for several years now running, moreso, when you consider the lack of feedback from said person relative to demands for refund.

Would I call it "bad faith"? Sure I am.

There is another latin phrase I am reminded of. "Succurro EGO sum in incendia!" which means literally "Help! I am on fire!" I find it to be extremely useful in cases where you are in a latin-speaking country and are on fire.