Rhiani32's page

13 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


The gods bless you for a non grid, non tagged VTT version! Way to many companies just offer the GM version and you gotta deal with moving your token around giant room numbers.

1 person marked this as a favorite.
James Case wrote:
Because it's only been about half a year since P2's release (hard to believe!), we've been focusing mostly on 1-4 adventures since those are the ones that most easily introduce people to the new system and because most Society characters just won't be at those higher levels yet. As we move into the second half of the system's debut year, you'll start to see some higher-tier adventures get added into the mix--as some people have noted, this month's quest and both of the Perennial Crown scenario's next month are 3-6s.

Thank you James. I am very understanding that it can be a "just be patient its coming" and that is reasonable. thank you for the info.

pauljathome wrote:

Given that a new player (one without any playtest points) would only fairly recently have even possibly have made it to level 5 (having played virtually ALL of the 1-4 scenarios and quests) I think that it is TOTALLY reasonable for Paizo to be concentrating on the 1-4 scenarios to the extent it is.

Those of us who started with a character or two at level 2 or 3 are the exception and not the rule. PFS really should NOT be catering to us. We get to try multiple characters and start them at level 2 when we get to multiclass :-). That is reward enough

Maybe I am just misusing this material. If the intent here is that these are only for society players that start at 0 points and restart over after hitting lvl 4 then so be it. I guess I am the odd man out.

As there has only been 1 module and the full APs published, I presumed (incorrectly it looks) that these were adventures to be used by a multitutde of PF GMs.

Did I miss an announcement somewhere that society matierla is only for lvl 1-4? Can we please get some non 1-4 lvl material? I get that that is where the majority of players are but the 13 of 16 scenarios are 1-4 adventures vs 3 for 5+ is getting old.

ClanPsi wrote:

1) All spells which can be heightened are spontaneously heightenable.

So if a caster has 4 1st levels, 4 2nd level, and 3 3rd level spells the 1st and 2nds automatically heighten to 3rd level giving them an effective 12 lvl 3 spells?

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Mark Moreland wrote:
Rhiani32 wrote:
Our lovely cast is..... missing Jeremey. I thought he was returning with Iculous?
That's an unfortunate oversight. Jeremy and Ikyulys are totally back (in a BIG WAY) for season 2.

In a... Bigulous way? lol

Our lovely cast is..... missing Jeremey. I thought he was returning with Iculous?

2 people marked this as a favorite.

I enjoyed the first season a lot.

Wish this was more than 8 episodes but I'll take it.

Hope this time around Rachel lets others get some more talk time in. I liked her character but she was jumping in too much on others. Might just be them getting used to playing with each other.

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Midnightoker wrote:

I find myself appreciating rules I used to just hate dealing with, so the fact that literally every rule was examined is basically a bonafide truth.

THIS. Its not like us GMs never had to deal with “vague, imprecise, and precise” concepts before. Now figuring it out has been done for us vs at the game table.

I suppose if the orcs are thinking in terms of perfectly synchronized PF2 mechanics they would do this.

RP wise why are they dancing around like dexterous elves vs face charging and beszrking to overpower their enemies?

Also people IRL rarely choose the mathematically optimal choice. Why are lower INT creatures doing it?

Is the problem with the flavor text of wands or the mechanics?

Mechanic wise they fit a purpose...
single use of 1 spell: scrolls
multiple uses of 1 spell: wands
multiple times per day for low level spells: stave (essentially more powerful wands)
once per day for high level spells: stave.

Flavor wise just have an item follow the stave rules and be a 10" piece of wood vs a 4' piece of wood.

At most as a GM I'd consider allow a wand to be powered up by sacrificing spell slots like the stave does.

Chris Lambertz wrote:
You should be able to copy and paste images out of just about every PDF product we release without too much difficulty. There are also some image extraction programs that exist to help with this for personal use.

Excellent thats exactly what I was hoping for. Thank you Chris.

Looking at the beastary books and there are pdf versions.
Are the pictures in there friendly for use within virtual table tops? As in they can be copied out for person use in private VTTs?
I've purchased pdfs from other companies and found out the pictures were blocked or blacked out and not able to be copied per private personal use.

Note: Please don't accuse me of pirating or stealing. If thats what I wanted I would have just gone and done that without asking here.