Mr Oger's page

As a player who got hit in the knee by errata ( i mean HIT) i gotta say that the most wisiest thing already been said.

However, if that character was so nerfed or the player had lost the will to play them due to a rules change, I'd advocate letting them rebuild. No reason a player should play a character they don't enjoy. Not really a game at that point.

So i think that a rebuild may be done only if your dm agree with you that your character need rebuild, you may change all but race and the main idea of character, so at the end of rebuild you will be the same guy, just with other tricks.

Mark Seifter wrote:

Chess Pwn wrote:

Mark Seifter wrote:

Chess Pwn wrote:

Chris Mortika wrote:

The week before Gen Con. What a good time for this kind of sorting out.

well they did say they wanted it out before gen con so that they could sort it out some before the con. so hopefully they will spend a few days at the start of next week answering some of these questions maybe?

I've been spending part of my weekend gathering them, anyway; I'm hoping we of the PDT can discuss them before Gencon (no promises, we are uber-swamped as you might expect, but I'll try). Honestly, I'm just glad it wasn't right before Gencon because it gives at least a little time.

yeah, I've been super impressed by how much you've done already. and I totally understand that you guys are busy for the con, we have the errata, that's good for sure, anything more is super bonus

I just want to do more, even though I know I might not be able to. I've been in the situation of waiting for errata, or for clarifications, as a player, and I know how it feels. Thank you for your patience, and I'll see what I can stir up!

In response to myself here: Thanks to all the great people here at the office who put up with the frenzied whirlwind of activity I needed to cause in order to get all this ready with awesomeness and grace, despite having their own frenzied whirlwind of pre-Gencon activity to handle, somehow I did manage to get a series of four clarifications up on the FAQ, quickly enough to be ready before Gencon. I am seriously surprised that we managed to do this (though my weekend searches through the forum helped). Anyways, here's a link (it goes to the first alphabetically, and you can scroll down and look for red ones).

Whaaaaaat. this one killed another character, kensai master of many styles daring champion (main idea - samurai without armor). wtf, paizo D:

"b/c it isn't very heroic to be evil..."
Why so? I can see why there is no CE characters, but i think LE can be "good" part of pathfinder sotiety.
Why not just make assassins not aligment depended? It`s the only class that is fully banned in pfs, and killing bad guys isn`t so evil.