|
Maya Coleman's page
Community & Social Media Specialist. Organized Play Member. 1,065 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 1 Organized Play character.
|
|
6 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Hilary Moon Murphy Super Fan wrote: She totally is! But she's got nothing on you! I appreciate your kindness here to both me and Hilary! Reminder that I use they/them/xe/xem pronouns though!
|
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Maya Coleman Super Fan wrote: Thank you, Maya! You're the best! Whoa, I have fans! Thank you!
|
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Elfteiroh wrote: This is treated as a reprint, so no, this won't be part of the subscription, as indicated by the lack of "this is part of X subscription" banner that all products parts of a sub line has.
On the other hand, BECAUSE it's treated as a reprint, everyone that has the old book's PDF will have access to the updated PDF this will provide.
This is correct info! Thanks for helping here as always, Elfteiroh!
|
4 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Terevalis Unctio of House Mysti wrote: Will there be a complete list of dragon options for dragonblooded sorcerers and barbarbians and acolytes in the Draconic Codex? Luis has confirmed the answer is yes!
|
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Everybody ready for Thursday???
|
7 people marked this as a favorite.
|
This conversation is full of a lot of emotion, which we encourage, and I just wanted to thank everyone for expressing their opinions without insult. A comment was flagged here for baiting, but I don't think it is. They stated their opinion calmly, and they're allowed to just dislike something. Anyway, carry on, and thank you for expressing your opinions in respectful ways!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Squark wrote: Will this require the Starfinder Player Core and GM core to run, or is this this intended as a standalone product? I'll ask the team this in our stream today!
|
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Leon Arcilla wrote: Paging through this right now... LOL at the Atrixyl. Not familiar if it's a remaster or new monster but isn't it just Kamen Rider Black? It even has a Rider Kick finisher--err "Resonating Kick".
Good stuff! Oh, and hopefully there's a foundryvtt token pack!
Our team has many nerds, confirmed! Also, no word on the Foundry token pack yet!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Gary D Norton wrote: The JPG version is not complete. There are far fewer "BACKS" than "FRONTS." At the very least, we're missing the BACKS for cards 410 through 450. I also noticed that BACK card 4 is missing; there are probably a few others that I haven't yet identified. I'll bring this to the team for review!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
enrik wrote: Since this book zooms in on regional conflict, will there be additional ancestry options? I'm wondering if there could be options for the Strix, Fetchlings or the Azarketi? We don't have news on this, and I also think it's spoilers!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Thank you all also for helping each other here!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
The Raven Black wrote: Or we are in the alternate timeline but no one noticed. (Insert Elmo shrug GIF)
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Moth Mariner wrote: In the Edicts & Anathema section of Seelah's sheet, it still talks about her being a Paladin instead of a Champion. This is very important for us to know! Thank you, Moth Mariner!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
QuidEst wrote: My sister misheard the title of this as "Guilt of the Raveworld", and I just want to make sure Paizo has that floating around in their head for Zo!'s promotional material. NOTED.
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Kittyburger wrote: Maya Coleman wrote: The Monster Match, it was a graveyard smash. Smashing in a graveyard, you say... This was unintentional! I regret it 0%!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
skotothalamos wrote: Maya Coleman wrote: skotothalamos wrote: I was looking for Guilt of the Grave World, but clicking "Get Latest Adventure Path" on the Adventure Path page brings me here. Thanks for pointing this out! Can you tell me which page your "Get Latest Adventure Path" was on and link me to it so I make sure to tell the team to correct the correct incorrect link? (That was so fun to say) From the front page, the Starfinder --> Adventures --> Adventures dropdown leads to https://paizo.com/store/starfinder/adventures/adventurepath
From there, the "Get the Latest Adventure Path" button leads to https://paizo.com/store/starfinder/adventures/adventurePath/driftCrashers
Ah, yes. This is something we're working on because we're revamping our site to include sections for both Starfinder First Edition and Second Edition. It will be fixed after the rework!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
LoreMonger13 wrote: With the Time Dragon featuring so prominently in Pathfinder Quest, I'm really excited to see their return to the TTRPG too!
And if their redesign is essentially in line with the art from PFQ, then I am SO very enamored with their updated look! <3
We're glad you like it, LoreMonger13! As a fan of purple scary things, I love them too!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
TheTownsend wrote: Here I was citing the book and I didn't notice that! I Could see them turning up in either this or Tech Core alongside SROs. Definitely a possibility for them to show in a future book!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Jenny Jarzabski wrote: Hi!
As some folks have mentioned here, Starfinder Adventure Paths have historically been shorter than Pathfinder ones. We only got a handful of 1-20s and after that they were considerably shorter. Guilt is classified as an Adventure Path even though it's shorter because it's designed to be an epic, setting-changing adventure that runs as a longer campaign. It's not a one-shot game night deal or an adventure anthology.
Yours isn't the first comment about naming though. The deluxe adventure, for example, should have just been called "adventure in a box" or something. We know that now. And like James said, we have been discussing what is an Adventure Path versus an adventure going forward.
I...
Thanks so much for helping out here, Jenny!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Perses13 wrote: The link to the GM Core pocket edition on this page is broken. It looks like there's some stray quotation marks messing things up. Thank you for pointing this out! I'll send it to the team!
|
4 people marked this as a favorite.
|
While you all know I can't spoil anything, I'm more than happy to just express the things I would personally enjoy as a member of the community as well. Right now we've seen iconics from both settings appear in art and short fiction (in a blog), but yes, it would be nice to have more. I'd like to have both rule setting books as well as fiction books too?
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
DemiurgeMCK wrote: Any chance that these spells could be added to the upcoming standalone GotGW Player's Guide, and thus available to players?
Just judging by the spells' names, there's a cool character concept or two I'd love to build!
Looking into this for you, DemiurgeMCK!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Kelseus wrote: My favorite art has to be either the new Alghollthu art, or the Despair Dragon. I really like the new Abrikandilu art too.
For Fiends, we have Demons, Devils, Daemons, Divs, Sahkil, and Velstracs.
Asura are all spirits.
No new general adjustments.
Despair Dragon art is top tier!
|
9 people marked this as a favorite.
|
I would like a series of hybrid books. :3
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
amalgam_81 wrote: Since folks are chatting about Pawns - any word on a Foundry token pack? No word yet, amalgam_81!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
I'm gonna put it in Pathfinder General so that it allows the discussion to be more broad if it wants to!
|
3 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Those are definitely some people we'd love to work with!! We don't have plans right now, but we'd certainly love to!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Kevin H. wrote: Where can I find errata on this adventure? There is a creature stat block with named spells that do not exist in the Adventure or Player Core, nor a note to look elsewhere. Looking for their spell descriptions The book hasn't been out for even a month, so there isn't errata yet, but thank you for pointing this out here!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
logic_poet wrote: The Get the Latest Adventure Path on the Starfinder AP page still links to Drift Crashers. Thanks for pointing this out! Can you tell me which page your "Get Latest Adventure Path" was on and link me to it so I make sure to tell the team to correct the correct incorrect link? (I have said this once before, and I'm gonna keep saying it until the problem is resolved because it is still fun to say.)
|
4 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Gazwin wrote: While I appreciate this coming out, I wish that Tech Core was coming first. Maybe I'm in the minority on that thought. Our book with tech classes is coming out later because of the timing of our Tech Class Playtest! We need to account for an appropriate amount of time to take on all the feedback from that before the book gets printed. Thank you for letting us know what you want to see though! We're working diligently to make sure you get a book you enjoy!
|
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Prince Maleus wrote: Oh Maya the Great and Glorious,
Will there be previews for Monster Core 2 this month?
I saw the post you made about Draconic Codex, just curious if MC2 will get some love prior.
We don't currently have plans to have previews for Monster Core 2, apart from sharing art on our socials because the art is rad!
|
6 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Marc Radle wrote: I know the forums will be updated at a later time, but MAN I hope part of that upgrade will include a way to kill all the spam that seems to be hotting the site lately :/ I'm hoping for this too! We're hoping the system we use will be better at filtering those bots before they even make posts. Here's hoping! If not, I'll still be here to swat them away ~

|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
LoreMonger13 wrote: Purchased the PDF and had a quick look through, and this looks like quite an exciting story to tell and play!
The new Mythic Destinies are QUITE cool, and while I was initially disappointed to hear that Timewracked doesn't directly play with spellcasting classes and it's way more geared toward martials, there are enough features that can work for any playstyle and as a whole it is DRIPPING with thematic flavor and interesting mechanics! I think what held it back most (without getting into specifics or spoilers) is that certain feats take a LOT of text to really elucidate how they are meant to work, which one might expect from time-bending abilities, translating to fewer feat options overall but very interesting and consequential choices between what's there (Preserve the Moment being the longest but one of the coolest such options)
So I want to compliment what the designers did with the space available, and while I may have liked a bit more synergy for spellcasters I would still happily slap this onto a chronomancer Wizard or Witchwarper any day! May not be optimized, but it's still rad as hell and I'll take flavor over mechanics all day every day.
Thank you so much for this feedback, LoreMonger13! I'll pass it on to the team!
|
3 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Scrip wrote: This store page is missing the web supplement. Can the web supplement link be added to this page? (And, likewise, added to the Special Edition's page.) I just wanted to give an update to say the team has added this to their list of to-dos!
|
3 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Prince Maleus wrote: I eagerly await Draconic Blogs. We do hope you'll like them! Stay tuned for the end of the month!
|
4 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Terevalis Unctio of House Mysti wrote: When will we be getting previews? The book has been pushed to December, but we'll have some blogs with previews at the end of this month and in November too!
|
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
logic_poet wrote: So what is product PZO14007? Spoilers!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Yes, please keep in mind lots of tech things will be in a later book!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Thank you for letting us know you want this!
|
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
IT'S MONSTER MATCH MONTH RAAAAHHH
|
4 people marked this as a favorite.
|
JiCi wrote: Then in this case, I would prefer to see Paizo simply ditching chromatics and metallics altogether in favor of expanding their own dragon families that they've made in Bestiaries 2 to 6, back in P1E.
For instance, I'd love to see more Primal dragons, like 2 dragons total per plane. We currently have Brine (Water), Cloud (Air), Crystal (Earth), Magma (Fire) and Umbral (The Void), so it would be cool to get 1 more dragon for Elemental Planes of Air, Earth, Fire and Water, 2 new ones for Metal and Wood each and one new specie for the Creation's Forge.
You will definitely enjoy this codex then! Lots of new for you!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
TheTownsend wrote: So, on a whim, I scanned through my copy of Galaxy Guide for any specifically referenced Ancestries, and I found about 20. Could it be one-to-one? PROBABLY NOT but I'm out here with a corkboard and a ball of string NONETHELESS.
Aside from the hard confirmed (worlanisi, bartrid, novian) and soft-confirmed (izalguun, formian) to be in this book, mentioned are…
Ilthisarian, ethesk, ryphorian, copaxi, three Szandite Collective ancestries: phasorq, atraxid, and mecenaic; six Kazmurg's Absurdity ancestries: azhan, g'folian, invemian, madrosarai, seksaviaks, and voletti; urog, maraquoi, and nuar.
Less likely mentions include khulan and moyishuu (fey, though the latter had 1e stats), anacite (cannon souless automatons), kothama (size huge), jinsul, cardali (extinct except for one guy), hallajin (energy beings), and uplifted bear (arguably already has PF stats).
This gave me "Pepe Sylvia, Pepe Sylvia" vibes, and I support it.
|
3 people marked this as a favorite.
|
JiCi wrote:
Can't they just have a small table as follow?
BLACK -> [new name]
BLUE -> [new name]
BRASS -> [new name]
BRONZE -> [new name]
COOPER -> [new name]
GOLD -> [new name]
GREEN -> [new name]
SILVER -> [new name]
RED -> [new name]
WHITE -> [new name]
That's all I need, really.
Though we won't be doing this, I'm sure a member of the community will!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Terevalis Unctio of House Mysti wrote: Will there be an option for subscribers to only get pdfs of products? As a subscription? This is not something we're working on, but we'll update if that changes!
|
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
logic_poet wrote: Guilt of the Grave World needs its own subforum. We made it! You can find it here!
|
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Also excited! Glad to see the community is too!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
This thread feels very accurately like General Discussion, but it as marked as in the wrong forum. Can someone else weigh in on why that might be so I can accurately asses? If you think it's already in the right place like I'm inclined to feel, let me know that as well! We encourage when our community asks questions!
|
5 people marked this as a favorite.
|
We updated the Player's Guide by the way! The wrong one was uploaded at first, but it has been corrected!
|
5 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Calcryx666 wrote: Here' s the Players Guide Blog goes out today as well everyone! Thank you all for waiting!
|
5 people marked this as a favorite.
|
We're sorry about the delay here everyone! We know you were all excited, but we appreciate your patience!
|